Literature DB >> 33639997

Energy delivery guided by indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing-Yi Duan1, Wen-He Zheng2, Hua Zhou1, Yuan Xu1, Hui-Bin Huang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of indirect calorimetry (IC) is increasing due to its precision in resting energy expenditure (REE) measurement in critically ill patients. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of an IC-guided nutrition therapy compared to predictive equations strategy in such a patient population.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases up to October 25, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they focused on energy delivery guided by either IC or predictive equations in critically ill adults. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Short-term mortality was the primary outcome. The meta-analysis was performed with the fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 991 adults met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate. Significantly higher mean energy delivered per day was observed in the IC group, as well as percent delivered energy over REE targets, than the control group. IC-guided energy delivery significantly reduced short-term mortality compared with the control group (risk ratio = 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.98; I2 = 3%, P = 0.03). IC-guided strategy did not significantly prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD] = 0.61 days; 95% CI - 1.08 to 2.29; P = 0.48), length of stay in ICU (MD = 0.32 days; 95% CI - 2.51 to 3.16; P = 0.82) and hospital (MD = 0.30 days; 95% CI - 3.23 to 3.83; P = 0.87). Additionally, adverse events were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates that IC-guided energy delivery significantly reduces short-term mortality in critically ill patients. This finding encourages the use of IC-guided energy delivery during critical nutrition support. But more high-quality studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critically ill; Energy delivery; Indirect calorimetry; Meta-analysis; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33639997      PMCID: PMC7913168          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03508-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  2 in total

1.  [Changing laws of rest energy expenditure in critically ill patients and the intervention effect for nutritional support: a prospective study].

Authors:  Shibing Zhao; Libin Duan; Gang Yu; Qi Zou; Qiang Wu; Huaxue Wang; Xiandi He
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue       Date:  2019-12

2.  [Application value of resting energy monitoring in nutritional support therapy for mechanical ventilation patients].

Authors:  Jun Shi; Ligang Xi; Tianhang Chi; Jiguan Song; Zifang Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue       Date:  2019-01
  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Bioenergetic Balance of Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration, a Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Joop Jonckheer; Alex Van Hoorn; Taku Oshima; Elisabeth De Waele
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Indirect calorimetry in critical illness: a new standard of care?

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Joop Jonckheer; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Penn State equation versus indirect calorimetry for nutritional assessment in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sonia Wu; Sameena Iqbal; Melanie Giroux; Norine Alam; Josie Campisi; Tarek Razek; Dan Deckelbaum; Jeremy Grushka; Katherine McKendy; Evan Wong; Judith Marcoux; Kosar A Khwaja
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard to assess REE in ICU patients: some limitations to consider.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Sebastien Redant; Thierry Preseau; Keitiane Kaefer; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Sami Anane; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Routine use of indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: pros and cons.

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Arthur R H van Zanten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Clinical nutrition issues in 2022: What is missing to trust supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients?

Authors:  Mette M Berger; Rosa Burgos; Michael P Casaer; Edoardo De Robertis; Juan Carlos Lopez Delgado; Vincent Fraipont; João Gonçalves-Pereira; Claude Pichard; Christian Stoppe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 7.  The Role of Indirect Calorimetry in Care of the Surgical Patient.

Authors:  Saskya E Byerly; D Dante Yeh
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2022-09-14

8.  External Validation of Equations to Estimate Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Children and Adolescents with and without Malnutrition: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  George Briassoulis; Efrossini Briassouli; Stavroula Ilia; Panagiotis Briassoulis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.706

9.  Measured Energy Expenditure Using Indirect Calorimetry in Post-Intensive Care Unit Hospitalized Survivors: A Comparison with Predictive Equations.

Authors:  Anne-Françoise Rousseau; Marjorie Fadeur; Camille Colson; Benoit Misset
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 6.706

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.