Literature DB >> 33639526

Time to update our suggestibility scales.

Sakari Kallio1.   

Abstract

Oakley and colleagues (2021) suggest that a classic scale - HGSHS:A, aiming to measure hypnotic suggestibility - can be used to measure direct verbal suggestibility (DVS). According to the authors, DVS is a trait that can be measured both with and without hypnosis. I find this initiative highly welcome. However, I wish to give several examples why it is time to develop entirely new scales instead. Rather than trying to explain more phenomena with a single scale or concept, researchers should take a cue from research that points to a far more nuanced picture of suggestibility than a construct like DVS allows. There may be no single, unified phenomenon that can be measured with a single scale. The old, time-tested scales should be treated neither as sacred nor final. They require up-to-date, critical analysis of what exactly they measure, with an eye to how they can be further improved.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automaticity; Hypnosis; Ideomotor suggestion; Suggestibility

Year:  2021        PMID: 33639526     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  2 in total

1.  Multisensory Integration Dominates Hypnotisability and Expectations in the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Mel Slater; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Editing reality in the brain.

Authors:  Eamonn Walsh; David A Oakley
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2022-07-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.