Literature DB >> 33638108

Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study.

Rajinder Parshad1, Shashikiran Nanjakla Jayappa2, Hemanga Kumar Bhattacharjee1, Suhani Suhani1, Mohit Kumar Joshi1, Debesh Bhoi1,3, Lokesh Kashyap1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental work comparing 3-Dimensional (3D) and 4K ultra-high-definition endovision system (4K) indicates that the latter with double the resolution of standard 2D high-definition systems may provide additional visual cues to compensate for the lack of stereoscopic vision. There is paucity of studies comparing 3D and 4K system in clinical settings. This randomized study compares 3D and 4K systems in three laparoscopic procedures of increasing complexity.
METHODS: 139 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (60 patients), transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (49 patients) and laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with anti- reflux procedure (30 patients) between May 2018 and February 2020 were randomized to undergo surgery using either 3D or 4K systems. Primary objective was to measure total operative time. Secondary objectives were to compare workload perceived by surgeons using SURG-TLX and surgeon satisfaction score. Timings of key surgical steps and peri-operative course of the patients was also recorded. Data were analyzed using Stata Corp. 2015.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery with 3D and 4K systems were comparable in their clinical and demographic profiles. The mean total operative time in 3D and 4K groups was comparable in cholecystectomy (52.7 vs 56.2, p = 0.50), TAPP (63.8 vs 69.6, p = 0.25) and Heller's cardiomyotomy (124.7 vs 143.3, p = 0.14) with faster hiatal dissection in 3D group (8 min, p = 0.02). Operative time was better in patients undergoing Heller's myotomy with Angle of His accentuation with 3D by 28 min (p = 0.03). Total workload was similar in 3D and 4K groups in all the procedures but mental & physical demand was lower in 3D group in Heller's cardiomyotomy (p = 0.03, p = 0.01), Surgeon satisfaction score was comparable in all three procedures.
CONCLUSION: Overall, 3D HD and 4K systems are comparable in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TAPP and Heller's Cardiomyotomy. Hiatal dissection time, mental and physical task load was better with 3D in Heller's Cardiomyotomy.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D laparoscopy; 4K ultra-high-definition; Heller’s cardiomyotomy; Operating time; Surg-TLX; TAPP; Workload

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33638108     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08377-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Shingo Kanaji; Ryohei Watanabe; Pietro Mascagni; Fabian Trauzettel; Takeshi Urade; Fabio Longo; Ludovica Guerriero; Silvana Perretta; Bernard Dallemagne; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.

Authors:  Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Shafneed Chaliyadan; Ashwani K Mishra; Harshit Agarwal; Suhani Suhani; Mohit Joshi; Rajinder Parshad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s.

Authors:  William E Kelley
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hanna E Koppatz; Jukka I Harju; Jukka E Sirén; Panu J Mentula; Tom M Scheinin; Ville J Sallinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 2.  Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vitish Singla; Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Ekansh Gupta; Deepti Singh; Ashwani K Mishra; Dalim Kumar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 3.  Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Brij Madhok; Kushan Nanayakkara; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-01-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.