Literature DB >> 33637559

Tracking Age Differences in Neural Distinctiveness across Representational Levels.

Malte Kobelt1,2, Verena R Sommer1, Attila Keresztes3,4, Markus Werkle-Bergner5, Myriam C Sander5.   

Abstract

The distinctiveness of neural information representation is crucial for successful memory performance but declines with advancing age. Computational models implicate age-related neural dedifferentiation on the level of item representations, but previous studies mostly focused on age differences of categorical information representation in higher-order visual regions. In an age-comparative fMRI study, we combined univariate analyses and whole-brain searchlight pattern similarity analyses to elucidate age differences in neural distinctiveness at both category and item levels and their relation to memory. Thirty-five younger (18-27 years old) and 32 older (67-75 years old) women and men incidentally encoded images of faces and houses, followed by an old/new recognition memory task. During encoding, age-related neural dedifferentiation was shown as reduced category-selective processing in ventral visual cortex and impoverished item specificity in occipital regions. Importantly, successful subsequent memory performance built on high item stability, that is, high representational similarity between initial and repeated presentation of an item, which was greater in younger than older adults. Overall, we found that differences in representational distinctiveness coexist across representational levels and contribute to interindividual and intraindividual variability in memory success, with item specificity being the strongest contributor. Our results close an important gap in the literature, showing that older adults' neural representation of item-specific information in addition to categorical information is reduced compared with younger adults.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A long-standing hypothesis links age-related cognitive decline to a loss of neural specificity. While previous evidence supports the notion of age-related neural dedifferentiation of category-level information in ventral visual cortex, whether or not age differences exist at the item level was a matter of debate. Here, we observed age group differences at both levels as well as associations between both categorical distinctiveness and item specificity to memory performance, with item specificity being the strongest contributor. Importantly, age differences in occipital item specificity were largely due to reduced item stability across repetitions in older adults. Our results suggest that age differences in neural representations can be observed across the entire cortical hierarchy and are not limited to category-level information.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; episodic memory; fMRI; neural dedifferentation; neural distinctiveness; representational similarity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33637559      PMCID: PMC8051684          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2038-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  69 in total

Review 1.  Representation is representation of similarities.

Authors:  S Edelman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Integrative neurocomputational perspectives on cognitive aging, neuromodulation, and representation.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Sverker Sikström
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Neural Dedifferentiation in the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Neural specificity predicts fluid processing ability in older adults.

Authors:  Joonkoo Park; Joshua Carp; Andrew Hebrank; Denise C Park; Thad A Polk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  BOLD hemodynamic response function changes significantly with healthy aging.

Authors:  Kathryn L West; Mark D Zuppichini; Monroe P Turner; Dinesh K Sivakolundu; Yuguang Zhao; Dema Abdelkarim; Jeffrey S Spence; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neural broadening or neural attenuation? Investigating age-related dedifferentiation in the face network in a large lifespan sample.

Authors:  Joonkoo Park; Joshua Carp; Kristen M Kennedy; Karen M Rodrigue; Gerard N Bischof; Chih-Mao Huang; Jennifer R Rieck; Thad A Polk; Denise C Park
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  FACES--a database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: development and validation.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Michaela Riediger; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

Review 9.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: an across-participant pattern similarity analysis.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2022-02-21

2.  Age-related declines in neural distinctiveness correlate across brain areas and result from both decreased reliability and increased confusability.

Authors:  M Simmonite; T A Polk
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 3.  Behavioral Studies Using Large-Scale Brain Networks - Methods and Validations.

Authors:  Mengting Liu; Rachel C Amey; Robert A Backer; Julia P Simon; Chad E Forbes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.