Literature DB >> 30529628

BOLD hemodynamic response function changes significantly with healthy aging.

Kathryn L West1, Mark D Zuppichini2, Monroe P Turner2, Dinesh K Sivakolundu2, Yuguang Zhao2, Dema Abdelkarim2, Jeffrey S Spence2, Bart Rypma2.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to infer age-differences in neural activity from the hemodynamic response function (HRF) that characterizes the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal over time. BOLD literature in healthy aging lacks consensus in age-related HRF changes, the nature of those changes, and their implications for measurement of age differences in brain function. Between-study discrepancies could be due to small sample sizes, analysis techniques, and/or physiologic mechanisms. We hypothesize that, with large sample sizes and minimal analysis assumptions, age-related changes in HRF parameters could reflect alterations in one or more components of the neural-vascular coupling system. To assess HRF changes in healthy aging, we analyzed the large population-derived dataset from the Cambridge Center for Aging and Neuroscience (CamCAN) study (Shafto et al., 2014). During scanning, 74 younger (18-30 years of age) and 173 older participants (54-74 years of age) viewed two checkerboards to the left and right of a central fixation point, simultaneously heard a binaural tone, and responded via right index finger button-press. To assess differences in the shape of the HRF between younger and older groups, HRFs were estimated using FMRIB's Linear Optimal Basis Sets (FLOBS) to minimize a priori shape assumptions. Group mean HRFs were different between younger and older groups in auditory, visual, and motor cortices. Specifically, we observed increased time-to-peak and decreased peak amplitude in older compared to younger adults in auditory, visual, and motor cortices. Changes in the shape and timing of the HRF in healthy aging, in the absence of performance differences, support our hypothesis of age-related changes in the neural-vascular coupling system beyond neural activity alone. More precise interpretations of HRF age-differences can be formulated once these physiologic factors are disentangled and measured separately.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30529628      PMCID: PMC6450381          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  27 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of Aging to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.

Authors:  T Michael De Silva; Frank M Faraci
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 19.318

2.  Hemodynamic responses are abnormal in isolated cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Brian D Berman; Christopher L Groth; Erica Shelton; Stefan H Sillau; Brianne Sutton; Kristina T Legget; Jason R Tregellas
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Age-related impairment of neurovascular coupling responses: a dynamic vessel analysis (DVA)-based approach to measure decreased flicker light stimulus-induced retinal arteriolar dilation in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Agnes Lipecz; Tamas Csipo; Stefano Tarantini; Rachel A Hand; Bich-Thy N Ngo; Shannon Conley; Gabor Nemeth; Alexis Tsorbatzoglou; Donald L Courtney; Valeriya Yabluchanska; Anna Csiszar; Zoltan I Ungvari; Andriy Yabluchanskiy
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 7.713

4.  Altered task-induced cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism underlies motor impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kathryn L West; Dinesh K Sivakolundu; Mark D Zuppichini; Monroe P Turner; Jeffrey S Spence; Hanzhang Lu; Darin T Okuda; Bart Rypma
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Investigating the effects of healthy cognitive aging on brain functional connectivity using 4.7 T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stanislau Hrybouski; Ivor Cribben; John McGonigle; Fraser Olsen; Rawle Carter; Peter Seres; Christopher R Madan; Nikolai V Malykhin
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Tracking Age Differences in Neural Distinctiveness across Representational Levels.

Authors:  Malte Kobelt; Verena R Sommer; Attila Keresztes; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Myriam C Sander
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Vascular and haemodynamic issues of brain ageing.

Authors:  Lucy Beishon; Rebecca H Clough; Meeriam Kadicheeni; Tamara Chithiramohan; Ronney B Panerai; Victoria J Haunton; Jatinder S Minhas; Thompson G Robinson
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm.

Authors:  Robert Luke; Eric Larson; Maureen J Shader; Hamish Innes-Brown; Lindsey Van Yper; Adrian K C Lee; Paul F Sowman; David McAlpine
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.593

9.  The effects of age on resting-state BOLD signal variability is explained by cardiovascular and cerebrovascular factors.

Authors:  Kamen A Tsvetanov; Richard N A Henson; P Simon Jones; Henk Mutsaerts; Delia Fuhrmann; Lorraine K Tyler; James B Rowe
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Age-related changes in cerebrovascular health and their effects on neural function and cognition: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zimmerman; Bart Rypma; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.