Literature DB >> 33635904

Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Nagahiro Tokuyama1, Naoki Takegawa1, Michiko Nishikawa1, Aya Sakai1, Takuya Mimura1, Saeko Kushida1, Hidetaka Tsumura1, Yoshinobu Yamamoto1, Ikuya Miki1, Masahiro Tsuda1.   

Abstract

In Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, nivolumab might provide overall survival benefits for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, it is effective only in a limited number of patients. The Glasgow prognostic score is an indicator of the systematic inflammatory response and nutritional status. This study aimed to investigate the ability of the Glasgow prognostic score and other markers to predict the outcomes of patients treated with nivolumab. We reviewed the medical records of patients treated for advanced gastric cancer and who received nivolumab between February 2015 and June 2019 at Hyogo Cancer Center. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their Glasgow prognostic scores. Overall, 53.3% and 46.7% of the patients were assigned to groups with Glasgow prognostic scores of 0 and 1/2, respectively. The median durations of progression-free and overall survival of the participants were 2.3 and 5.7 months, respectively. The patients with a Glasgow prognostic score of 0 had significantly higher median overall survival than those with scores of 1 or 2 (16.4 vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.0006). This observation suggests that a pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score of 0 is associated with better outcomes, and this scoring system may be used as a predictor of outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with nivolumab.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635904      PMCID: PMC7909621          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  27 in total

1.  Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yung-Jue Bang; Eric Van Cutsem; Andrea Feyereislova; Hyun C Chung; Lin Shen; Akira Sawaki; Florian Lordick; Atsushi Ohtsu; Yasushi Omuro; Taroh Satoh; Giuseppe Aprile; Evgeny Kulikov; Julie Hill; Michaela Lehle; Josef Rüschoff; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of ramucirumab monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel in gastric cancer patients from the Expanded Access Program Cohort by the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG).

Authors:  Minkyu Jung; Min-Hee Ryu; Do Youn Oh; Myounghee Kang; Dae Young Zang; In Gyu Hwang; Keun-Wook Lee; Ki Hyang Kim; Byoung Yong Shim; Eun Kee Song; Sun Jin Sym; Hye Sook Han; Young Lee Park; Jin Soo Kim; Hyun Woo Lee; Moon Hee Lee; Dong-Hoe Koo; Hong Suk Song; Namsu Lee; Sung Hyun Yang; Dae Ro Choi; Young Seon Hong; Kyoung Eun Lee; Chi Hoon Maeng; Jin Ho Baek; Samyong Kim; Yeul Hong Kim; Sun Young Rha; Jae Yong Cho; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Julian Loos; Josephine Dedow; Michael Tachezy; Guentac Uzunoglu; Asad Kutup; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach.

Authors:  C Luchini; F Bibeau; M J L Ligtenberg; N Singh; A Nottegar; T Bosse; R Miller; N Riaz; J-Y Douillard; F Andre; A Scarpa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Eosinophils orchestrate cancer rejection by normalizing tumor vessels and enhancing infiltration of CD8(+) T cells.

Authors:  Rafael Carretero; Ibrahim M Sektioglu; Natalio Garbi; Oscar C Salgado; Philipp Beckhove; Günter J Hämmerling
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 25.606

6.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: a comparison of clinicopathological factors and the development of an inflammation-based prognostic system.

Authors:  Barry J Laird; Stein Kaasa; Donald C McMillan; Marie T Fallon; Marianne J Hjermstad; Peter Fayers; Pal Klepstad
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kazuo Okadome; Yoshifumi Baba; Taisuke Yagi; Yuki Kiyozumi; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Clinical Implication of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Pancreatic Cancer: Glasgow Prognostic Score Is the Most Reliable Parameter.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Norimitsu Yabusaki; Kenta Murotani; Naoki Iwata; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical features as potential prognostic factors in patients treated with nivolumab for highly pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Akihiko Sano; Makoto Sohda; Nobuhiro Nakazawa; Yasunari Ubukata; Kengo Kuriyama; Akiharu Kimura; Norimichi Kogure; Hisashi Hosaka; Atsushi Naganuma; Masanori Sekiguchi; Kana Saito; Kyoichi Ogata; Makoto Sakai; Hiroomi Ogawa; Ken Shirabe; Hiroshi Saeki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Prognostic factors to predict the survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer who receive later-line nivolumab monotherapy-The Asahikawa Gastric Cancer Cohort Study (AGCC).

Authors:  Kazuyuki Tanaka; Hiroki Tanabe; Hiroki Sato; Chisato Ishikawa; Mitsuru Goto; Naoyuki Yanagida; Hiromitsu Akabane; Shiro Yokohama; Kimiharu Hasegawa; Yohei Kitano; Yuya Sugiyama; Kyoko Uehara; Yu Kobayashi; Yuki Murakami; Takehito Kunogi; Takahiro Sasaki; Keitaro Takahashi; Katsuyoshi Ando; Nobuhiro Ueno; Shin Kashima; Kentaro Moriichi; Keisuke Sato; Sayaka Yuzawa; Mishie Tanino; Masaki Taruiishi; Yasuo Sumi; Yusuke Mizukami; Mikihiro Fujiya; Toshikatsu Okumura
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.