Literature DB >> 33635892

Spatial navigation with horizontally spatialized sounds in early and late blind individuals.

Samuel Paré1, Maxime Bleau1, Ismaël Djerourou1, Vincent Malotaux2, Ron Kupers1,2,3, Maurice Ptito1,3.   

Abstract

Blind individuals often report difficulties to navigate and to detect objects placed outside their peri-personal space. Although classical sensory substitution devices could be helpful in this respect, these devices often give a complex signal which requires intensive training to analyze. New devices that provide a less complex output signal are therefore needed. Here, we evaluate a smartphone-based sensory substitution device that offers navigation guidance based on strictly spatial cues in the form of horizontally spatialized sounds. The system uses multiple sensors to either detect obstacles at a distance directly in front of the user or to create a 3D map of the environment (detection and avoidance mode, respectively), and informs the user with auditory feedback. We tested 12 early blind, 11 late blind and 24 blindfolded-sighted participants for their ability to detect obstacles and to navigate in an obstacle course. The three groups did not differ in the number of objects detected and avoided. However, early blind and late blind participants were faster than their sighted counterparts to navigate through the obstacle course. These results are consistent with previous research on sensory substitution showing that vision can be replaced by other senses to improve performance in a wide variety of tasks in blind individuals. This study offers new evidence that sensory substitution devices based on horizontally spatialized sounds can be used as a navigation tool with a minimal amount of training.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33635892      PMCID: PMC7909643          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  37 in total

1.  Nonvisual Cues for Aligning to Cross Streets.

Authors:  Alan C Scott; Janet M Barlow; David A Guth; Billie Louise Bentzen; Christopher M Cunningham; Richard Long
Journal:  J Vis Impair Blind       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Is there a future for sensory substitution outside academic laboratories?

Authors:  Giulia V Elli; Stefania Benetti; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.286

Review 3.  The role of visual deprivation and experience on the performance of sensory substitution devices.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Amy C Nau; Michael R Ibbotson; Nick Barnes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  There is something out there: distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later.

Authors:  Malika Auvray; Sylvain Hanneton; Charles Lenay; Kevin O'Regan
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Human echolocation: Blind and sighted persons' ability to detect sounds recorded in the presence of a reflecting object.

Authors:  Bo N Schenkman; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 6.  Multisensory perceptual learning and sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; David J Brown; Achille Pasqualotto; Peter Meijer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: localisation and object recognition with 'the vOICe'.

Authors:  Malika Auvray; Sylvain Hanneton; J Kevin O'Regan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Visual-vestibular influences on locomotor adjustments for stepping over an obstacle.

Authors:  Bradford J McFadyen; Laurent Bouyer; Leah R Bent; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Navigating from a Depth Image Converted into Sound.

Authors:  Chloé Stoll; Richard Palluel-Germain; Vincent Fristot; Denis Pellerin; David Alleysson; Christian Graff
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 10.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

View more
  3 in total

1.  LidSonic V2.0: A LiDAR and Deep-Learning-Based Green Assistive Edge Device to Enhance Mobility for the Visually Impaired.

Authors:  Sahar Busaeed; Iyad Katib; Aiiad Albeshri; Juan M Corchado; Tan Yigitcanlar; Rashid Mehmood
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Blindness and the Reliability of Downwards Sensors to Avoid Obstacles: A Study with the EyeCane.

Authors:  Maxime Bleau; Samuel Paré; Ismaël Djerourou; Daniel R Chebat; Ron Kupers; Maurice Ptito
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The Unfolding Space Glove: A Wearable Spatio-Visual to Haptic Sensory Substitution Device for Blind People.

Authors:  Jakob Kilian; Alexander Neugebauer; Lasse Scherffig; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.