Literature DB >> 25693297

Is there a future for sensory substitution outside academic laboratories?

Giulia V Elli, Stefania Benetti, Olivier Collignon.   

Abstract

Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) have been developed with the ultimate purpose of supporting sensory deprived individuals in their daily activities. However, more than forty years after their first appearance in the scientific literature, SSDs still remain more common in research laboratories than in the daily life of people with sensory deprivation. Here, we seek to identify the reasons behind the limited diffusion of SSDs among the blind community by discussing the ergonomic, neurocognitive and psychosocial issues potentially associated with the use of these systems. We stress that these issues should be considered together when developing future devices or improving existing ones. We provide some examples of how to achieve this by adopting a multidisciplinary and participatory approach. These efforts would contribute not solely to address fundamental theoretical research questions, but also to better understand the everyday needs of blind people and eventually promote the use of SSDs outside laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25693297     DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  15 in total

1.  'Visual' parsing can be taught quickly without visual experience during critical periods.

Authors:  Lior Reich; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Integration and binding in rehabilitative sensory substitution: Increasing resolution using a new Zooming-in approach.

Authors:  Galit Buchs; Shachar Maidenbaum; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  The Sound of Vision Project: On the Feasibility of an Audio-Haptic Representation of the Environment, for the Visually Impaired.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Runar Unnthorsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 4.  Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals.

Authors:  Victor R Schinazi; Tyler Thrash; Daniel-Robert Chebat
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-12-18

5.  Sensory augmentation: integration of an auditory compass signal into human perception of space.

Authors:  Frank Schumann; J Kevin O'Regan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Structured Laser Light Improves Tripping Hazard Recognition for People with Visual Impairments.

Authors:  Michael Stahl; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 7.  Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind.

Authors:  Maurice Ptito; Maxime Bleau; Ismaël Djerourou; Samuel Paré; Fabien C Schneider; Daniel-Robert Chebat
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Perception of Graphical Virtual Environments by Blind Users via Sensory Substitution.

Authors:  Shachar Maidenbaum; Galit Buchs; Sami Abboud; Ori Lavi-Rotbain; Amir Amedi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Conveying facial expressions to blind and visually impaired persons through a wearable vibrotactile device.

Authors:  Hendrik P Buimer; Marian Bittner; Tjerk Kostelijk; Thea M van der Geest; Abdellatif Nemri; Richard J A van Wezel; Yan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.