Literature DB >> 33635778

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models: Electronic Health Record Data To Predict Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery.

Stacey E Alexeeff1, Stephen Uong1, Liyan Liu1, Neal H Shorstein2, James Carolan3, Laura B Amsden1, Lisa J Herrinton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop predictive models of final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) following cataract surgery using machine learning algorithms and electronic health record data.
METHODS: In this predictive modeling study we used decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting. We included the first surgical eye of 64,768 members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who underwent cataract surgery from June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2015. We measured discrimination and calibration of machine learning models for predicting postoperative CDVA 20/50 or worse vs 20/40 or better.
RESULTS: The training set included 51,712 patients, and the validation set included 13,056 patients. We compared 3 machine learning models and found that the gradient boosting model provided the best discrimination ability for CDVA. The most important variables for predicting final CDVA 20/50 or worse were preoperative CDVA, age, and age-related macular degeneration, which together accounted for 41% of the gain in optimization of the gradient boosting model. Other important variables in the model included dispensed glaucoma medication, epiretinal membrane, cornea disorder, cataract surgery operating time, surgeon experience, and census block neighborhood characteristics (household income, family income, family poverty, college education, and home residence by owner).
CONCLUSION: For predicting CDVA after cataract surgery, gradient boosting had the best ability to discriminate patients with postoperative CDVA 20/50 or worse from patients with postoperative CDVA 20/40 or better. Machine learning has the potential to improve prognosis and can improve patient information when making decisions to undergo cataract surgery.
Copyright © 2020 The Permanente Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33635778      PMCID: PMC8817938          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/20.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  16 in total

1.  Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Robert J Glynn; Jeremy Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Current state and future prospects of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a review.

Authors:  Daniel T Hogarty; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Natural language processing to ascertain two key variables from operative reports in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Liyan Liu; Neal H Shorstein; Laura B Amsden; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

7.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  Application of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Xue-Li Du; Wen-Bo Li; Bo-Jie Hu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD).

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Predicting Visual Acuity by Using Machine Learning in Patients Treated for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Markus Rohm; Volker Tresp; Michael Müller; Christoph Kern; Ilja Manakov; Maximilian Weiss; Dawn A Sim; Siegfried Priglinger; Pearse A Keane; Karsten Kortuem
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  1 in total

1.  Looking for low vision: Predicting visual prognosis by fusing structured and free-text data from electronic health records.

Authors:  Haiwen Gui; Benjamin Tseng; Wendeng Hu; Sophia Y Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.046

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.