Literature DB >> 33634771

Association between hourly wages and dietary intake after the first phase of implementation of the Minneapolis minimum wage ordinance.

Leah Elizabeth Chapman1,2, Seth A Berkowitz3, Alice Ammerman1,2, Molly De Marco1,2, Shu Wen Ng1,4, Catherine Zimmer5, Caitlin E Caspi6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, Minneapolis began phased implementation of an ordinance to increase the local minimum wage to $15/h. We sought to determine whether the first phase of implementation was associated with changes in frequency of consumption of fruits and vegetables (F&V), whole-grain-rich foods, and foods high in added sugars among low-wage workers.
DESIGN: Natural experiment.
SETTING: The Wages Study is a prospective cohort study of 974 low-wage workers followed throughout the phased implementation of the ordinance (2018-2022). We used difference-in-difference analysis to compare outcomes among workers in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to those in a comparison city (Raleigh, North Carolina). We assessed wages using participants' pay stubs and dietary intake using the National Cancer Institute Dietary Screener Questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Analyses use the first two waves of Wages data (2018 (baseline), 2019) and includes 267 and 336 low-wage workers in Minneapolis and Raleigh, respectively.
RESULTS: After the first phase of implementation, wages increased in both cities, but the increase was $0·84 greater in Minneapolis (P = 0·02). However, the first phase of the policy's implementation was not associated with changes in daily frequency of consumption of F&V (IRR = 1·03, 95 % CI: 0·86, 1·24, P = 0·73), whole-grain-rich foods (IRR = 1·23, 95 % CI: 0·89, 1·70, P = 0·20), or foods high in added sugars (IRR = 1·13, 95 % CI: 0·86, 1·47, P = 0·38) among workers in Minneapolis compared to Raleigh.
CONCLUSIONS: The first phase of implementation of the Minneapolis minimum wage policy was associated with increased wages, but not with changes in dietary intake. Future research should examine whether full implementation is associated dietary changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary intake; Minimum wage; Natural experiment; Social policy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33634771      PMCID: PMC8316265          DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021000707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.539


  20 in total

Review 1.  Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vasanti S Malik; Matthias B Schulze; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Development and Evaluation of the National Cancer Institute's Dietary Screener Questionnaire Scoring Algorithms.

Authors:  Frances E Thompson; Douglas Midthune; Lisa Kahle; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Diet-related disparities: understanding the problem and accelerating solutions.

Authors:  Jessie A Satia
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-04

Review 4.  Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases.

Authors:  Heiner Boeing; Angela Bechthold; Achim Bub; Sabine Ellinger; Dirk Haller; Anja Kroke; Eva Leschik-Bonnet; Manfred J Müller; Helmut Oberritter; Matthias Schulze; Peter Stehle; Bernhard Watzl
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 5.  Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes.

Authors:  Tauseef A Khan; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Disparities in State-Specific Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Seung Hee Lee-Kwan; Latetia V Moore; Heidi M Blanck; Diane M Harris; Deb Galuska
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Teague; George J Youssef; Jacqui A Macdonald; Emma Sciberras; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Chris Greenwood; Jennifer McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Delyse Hutchinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  The Relationship between Vegetable Intake and Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Monica Nour; Sarah Alice Lutze; Amanda Grech; Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The Relationship between Whole Grain Intake and Body Weight: Results of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Kevin C Maki; Orsolya M Palacios; Katie Koecher; Caleigh M Sawicki; Kara A Livingston; Marjorie Bell; Heather Nelson Cortes; Nicola M McKeown
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Difference-in-Differences Method in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Utility with Unbalanced Groups.

Authors:  Huanxue Zhou; Christopher Taber; Steve Arcona; Yunfeng Li
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.561

View more
  2 in total

1.  Associations Among Select State Policies and the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases in the United States from 2008 Through 2017.

Authors:  Allison Maria Lacko; David Guilkey; Barry Popkin; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Improving Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility, Purchasing, and Consumption to Advance Nutrition Security and Health Equity in the United States.

Authors:  Bailey Houghtaling; Matthew Greene; Kaustubh V Parab; Chelsea R Singleton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.