Frances E Thompson1, Douglas Midthune2, Lisa Kahle3, Kevin W Dodd2. 1. Divisions of Cancer Control and Population Sciences and thompsof@mail.nih.gov. 2. Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and. 3. Information Management Services, Silver Spring, MD.
Abstract
Background: Methods for improving the utility of short dietary assessment instruments are needed.Objective: We sought to describe the development of the NHANES Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) and its scoring algorithms and performance. Methods: The 19-item DSQ assesses intakes of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, added sugars, dairy, fiber, and calcium. Two nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recalls and the DSQ were administered in NHANES 2009-2010 to respondents aged 2-69 y (n = 7588). The DSQ frequency responses, coupled with sex- and age-specific portion size information, were regressed on intake from 24-h recalls by using the National Cancer Institute usual intake method to obtain scoring algorithms to estimate mean and prevalences of reaching 2 a priori threshold levels. The resulting scoring algorithms were applied to the DSQ and compared with intakes estimated with the 24-h recall data only. The stability of the derived scoring algorithms was evaluated in repeated sampling. Finally, scoring algorithms were applied to screener data, and these estimates were compared with those from multiple 24-h recalls in 3 external studies. Results: The DSQ and its scoring algorithms produced estimates of mean intake and prevalence that agreed closely with those from multiple 24-h recalls. The scoring algorithms were stable in repeated sampling. Differences in the means were <2%; differences in prevalence were <16%. In other studies, agreement between screener and 24-h recall estimates in fruit and vegetable intake varied. For example, among men in 2 studies, estimates from the screener were significantly lower than the 24-h recall estimates (3.2 compared with 3.8 and 3.2 compared with 4.1). In the third study, agreement between the screener and 24-h recall estimates were close among both men (3.2 compared with 3.1) and women (2.6 compared with 2.5).Conclusions: This approach to developing scoring algorithms is an advance in the use of screeners. However, because these algorithms may not be generalizable to all studies, a pilot study in the proposed study population is advisable. Although more precise instruments such as 24-h dietary recalls are recommended in most research, the NHANES DSQ provides a less burdensome alternative when time and resources are constrained and interest is in a limited set of dietary factors.
Background: Methods for improving the utility of short dietary assessment instruments are needed.Objective: We sought to describe the development of the NHANES Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) and its scoring algorithms and performance. Methods: The 19-item DSQ assesses intakes of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, added sugars, dairy, fiber, and calcium. Two nonconsecutive 24-h dietary recalls and the DSQ were administered in NHANES 2009-2010 to respondents aged 2-69 y (n = 7588). The DSQ frequency responses, coupled with sex- and age-specific portion size information, were regressed on intake from 24-h recalls by using the National Cancer Institute usual intake method to obtain scoring algorithms to estimate mean and prevalences of reaching 2 a priori threshold levels. The resulting scoring algorithms were applied to the DSQ and compared with intakes estimated with the 24-h recall data only. The stability of the derived scoring algorithms was evaluated in repeated sampling. Finally, scoring algorithms were applied to screener data, and these estimates were compared with those from multiple 24-h recalls in 3 external studies. Results: The DSQ and its scoring algorithms produced estimates of mean intake and prevalence that agreed closely with those from multiple 24-h recalls. The scoring algorithms were stable in repeated sampling. Differences in the means were <2%; differences in prevalence were <16%. In other studies, agreement between screener and 24-h recall estimates in fruit and vegetable intake varied. For example, among men in 2 studies, estimates from the screener were significantly lower than the 24-h recall estimates (3.2 compared with 3.8 and 3.2 compared with 4.1). In the third study, agreement between the screener and 24-h recall estimates were close among both men (3.2 compared with 3.1) and women (2.6 compared with 2.5).Conclusions: This approach to developing scoring algorithms is an advance in the use of screeners. However, because these algorithms may not be generalizable to all studies, a pilot study in the proposed study population is advisable. Although more precise instruments such as 24-h dietary recalls are recommended in most research, the NHANES DSQ provides a less burdensome alternative when time and resources are constrained and interest is in a limited set of dietary factors.
Authors: Raymond J Carroll; Douglas Midthune; Amy F Subar; Marina Shumakovich; Laurence S Freedman; Frances E Thompson; Victor Kipnis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Frances E Thompson; Sujata Dixit-Joshi; Nancy Potischman; Kevin W Dodd; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Lawrence H Kushi; Gwen L Alexander; Laura A Coleman; Thea P Zimmerman; Maria E Sundaram; Heather A Clancy; Michelle Groesbeck; Deirdre Douglass; Stephanie M George; TusaRebecca E Schap; Amy F Subar Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-05-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Frances E Thompson; Timothy S McNeel; Emily C Dowling; Douglas Midthune; Meredith Morrissette; Christopher A Zeruto Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2009-08
Authors: Uriyoán Colón-Ramos; Frances E Thompson; Amy Lazarus Yaroch; Richard P Moser; Timothy S McNeel; Kevin W Dodd; Audie A Atienza; Sharon B Sugerman; Linda Nebeling Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2009-11
Authors: Arthur Schatzkin; Amy F Subar; Steven Moore; Yikyung Park; Nancy Potischman; Frances E Thompson; Michael Leitzmann; Albert Hollenbeck; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Victor Kipnis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Frances E Thompson; Douglas Midthune; Amy F Subar; Lisa L Kahle; Arthur Schatzkin; Victor Kipnis Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Cynthia N Lebron; Yaray Agosto; Tae K Lee; Guillermo Prado; Sara M St George; Hilda Pantin; Sarah E Messiah Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Lauren E Au; Sonya M Zhu; Lilly A Nhan; Kaela R Plank; Edward A Frongillo; Barbara A Laraia; Klara Gurzo; Lorrene D Ritchie Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Cynthia N Lebron; Tae K Lee; Guillermo Prado; Sara M St George; Hilda Pantin; Sarah E Messiah Journal: Appetite Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Guillermo Prado; Alejandra Fernandez; Sara M St George; Tae K Lee; Cynthia Lebron; Maria I Tapia; Maria Rosa Velazquez; Sarah E Messiah Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 5.043