Literature DB >> 12142662

Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.

Maurice Y Nahabedian1, Bahram Momen, Gregory Galdino, Paul N Manson.   

Abstract

Recent reports of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap indicate increased fat necrosis and venous congestion as compared with the free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Although the benefits of the DIEP flap regarding the abdominal wall are well documented, its reconstructive advantage remains uncertain. The main objective of this study was to address selection criteria for the free TRAM and DIEP flaps on the basis of patient characteristics and vascular anatomy of the flap that might minimize flap morbidity. A total of 163 free TRAM or DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 135 women between 1997 and 2000. Four levels of muscle sparing related to the rectus abdominis muscle were used. The free TRAM flap was performed on 118 women, of whom 93 were unilateral and 25 were bilateral, totaling 143 flaps. The DIEP flap procedure was performed on 17 women, of whom 14 were unilateral and three were bilateral, totaling 20 flaps. Morbidities related to the 143 free TRAM flaps included return to the operating room for 11 flaps (7.7 percent), total necrosis in five flaps (3.5 percent), mild fat necrosis in 14 flaps (9.8 percent), mild venous congestion in two flaps (1.4 percent), and lower abdominal bulge in eight women (6.8 percent). Partial flap necrosis did not occur. Morbidities related to the 20 DIEP flaps included return to the operating room for three flaps (15 percent), total necrosis in one flap (5 percent), and mild fat necrosis in two flaps (10 percent). Partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, and a lower abdominal bulge were not observed. Selection of the free TRAM or DIEP flap should be made on the basis of patient weight, quantity of abdominal fat, and breast volume requirement, and on the number, caliber, and location of the perforating vessels. Occurrence of venous congestion and total flap loss in the free TRAM and DIEP flaps appears to be independent of the patient age, weight, degree of muscle sparing, and tobacco use. The occurrence of fat necrosis is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) but not related to patient age or preservation of the rectus abdominis muscle. The ability to perform a sit-up is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) and patient age (p < 0.001) but not related to preservation of the muscle or intercostal nerves. The incidence of lower abdominal bulge is reduced after DIEP flap reconstruction (p < 0.001). The DIEP flap can be an excellent option for properly selected women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12142662     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  63 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Achieving ideal donor site aesthetics with autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Achieving ideal breast aesthetics with autologous reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

7.  The Potential Impact of Plastic Surgery Expertise on Body Contouring Procedure Outcomes.

Authors:  Dylan R Bezzini; George N Washington; Olumayowa Abiodun; Olubode A Olufajo; India Jones; DeMario Montez Butts; Gezzer Ortega; Henry Paul
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

9.  A scientometric analysis of 20 years of research on breast reconstruction surgery: a guide for research design and journal selection.

Authors:  Mehrdad Moghimi; Mehdi Fathi; Ali Marashi; Freshteh Kamani; Gholamreza Habibi; Armin Hirbod-Mobarakeh; Marjan Ghaemi; Mahdi Hosseinian-Sarajehlou
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-03-11

10.  Anatomical landmarks for safe elevation of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Saeed Chowdhry; Ron Hazani; Philip Collis; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.