Literature DB >> 33633948

Narrative review of the influence of high-intensity interval training on adolescents' bone health: commentary and perspectives.

Matias Noll1,2, Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça2, Ana Paula Dos Santos Rodrigues3, Alexandre Aparecido de Almeida4, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll1,5.   

Abstract

Although several benefits have been associated to high-intensity interval training (HIIT), there is a lack of clarity on the HIIT effects in adolescents, especially on bone health outcomes. To address this gap, our research aimed to perform a systematic review, which focus on the influence of HIIT on adolescents' bone health. Our search strategy was conducted on three databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase). For our review, we included articles with the following characteristics: (I) sample consisting of adolescents (10-19 years old), (II) HIIT interventions; and (III) assessment of bone health outcomes. Longitudinal and clinical trials studies with no language and year of publications restrictions were eligible to be included. A total of 63 eligible studies were identified. After removing the duplicates and screening the titles and abstracts, six articles remained to be read in full text. However, none of the articles met our criteria. Studies in which no article meets the eligibility criteria are also essential and need to be shared with the academic community because it may stimulate appropriate future investigations in this field. This lack in the review results highlights the need for further epidemiological research focusing on this topic, including high quality, large scale, and longitudinal studies, as well as randomized controlled trials to confirm or refute efficacy. 2021 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Schoolchild; bone mineral content; bone mineral density (BMD); high-intensity interval training (HIIT); teenager

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633948      PMCID: PMC7882286          DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Pediatr        ISSN: 2224-4336


Introduction

The development of bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) during childhood and adolescence is substantial and may attenuate the incidence and effects of osteoporosis later in life (1). Recent study assessed 663 Danish students over 6 years from childhood to adolescence and found positive associations between the level of physical activity and bone health (2). Systematic reviews have shown that physical activity, as well as weight-bearing exercises, enhance bone mineral accrual (3-6). According to current recommendations on physical activity for children and young people, vigorous-intensity activities are essential, “including those that strengthen muscle and bone, at least 3 times per week” (7). Both moderate and vigorous activities are indicated to reach wide health benefits, including bone health (8,9), but the greatest benefit is provided by vigorous intensity physical activity (10-13), which is associated with the healthiest outcomes and the lowest risk of developing diseases later in life (11,14,15). Nowadays, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is in the spotlight from both scientific and practical views. By definition, HIIT involves alternating short bursts of high intensity exercise with recovery periods or light exercise (16) and requires ‘near maximal’ efforts (≥80%, maximal heart rate; or ≥80%, maximal oxygen consumption) (17). Recent meta-review (18) analyzed 33 systematic reviews (child to adult) and found evidences suggesting that HIIT may improve anthropometric variables, exercise capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular function, and anxiety and depression severity in both healthy individuals, as well as those with physical health disorders. Despite these health evidences support HIIT practice, only 5 reviews (19-23) from all 33 addressed children and adolescents, which reflects that the focus has been given to adult population. Although several benefits have been associated to HIIT (18), to the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of clarity on the HIIT effects in adolescents, especially on bone health outcomes. So, here we aimed to perform a systematic review, which focus on the influence of HIIT on adolescents’ bone health. We present the following article in accordance with the Narrative Review reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-166).

Methods

For the review, we included articles with the following characteristics: (I) sample consisting of adolescents (10–19 years old, as defined by the World Health Organization), (II) HIIT interventions; and (III) assessment of bone health outcomes (such as BMC or BMD). Longitudinal and clinical trials studies with no language and year of publications restrictions were eligible to be included. Studies with (I) incomplete data, (II) review articles, and (III) specific populations including athletes, hospitalized adolescents, diseased and disabled people were excluded. Our search strategy was conducted on three databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase). As the pattern, the following combinations of three sets of keywords were used in the Pubmed: (“adolescent”[MeSH Terms] OR “minors”[MeSH Terms] OR “adolescent”[Title/Abstract] OR “minors”[Title/Abstract] OR “Youth”[Title/Abstract] OR “juvenile”[Title/Abstract] OR “teen”[Title/Abstract] OR “teenager”[Title/Abstract] OR “Childhood”[Title/Abstract] OR “adolescence”[Title/Abstract] OR “schoolchild”[Title/Abstract] OR “Schoolchildren”[Title/Abstract] OR “young”[Title/Abstract]) AND “bone density” [MeSH Terms] OR “bone health” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone density” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone densities” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone mineral density” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone mineral densities” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone mineral content” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone mineral contents” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone tissue” [Title/Abstract]) OR “bone and bones” [MeSH Terms] OR skeleton [MeSH Terms] OR skeleton [Title/Abstract] OR “bone mass” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone demineralization” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone development” [Title/Abstract] OR “densitometry” [MeSH Terms] OR “densitometry” [Title/Abstract] OR “bone architecture” OR “bone structure” OR “bone strength” AND (“High-intensity training”[Title/Abstract] OR “High-intensity interval training”[Title/Abstract] OR “high-intensity interval training”[MeSH Terms] OR “high intensity intermittent training”[Title/Abstract] OR “Repeated sprint training”[Title/Abstract] OR “interval training”[Title/Abstract] OR “intermittent training”[Title/Abstract] OR “high intensity sprint”[Title/Abstract] OR “aerobic interval training”[Title/Abstract] OR “High-intensity interval training”[Title/Abstract] OR “high-intensity interval exercise”[Title/Abstract] OR “high-intensity interval exercise”[Title/Abstract] OR “high-intensity intermittent exercise”[Title/Abstract] OR “high-intensity intermittent exercise”[Title/Abstract] OR “high intensity intermittent training”[Title/Abstract] OR “high intensity intermittent training”[Title/Abstract] OR “HIIE”[Title/Abstract] OR “HIIT”[Title/Abstract]). The same keywords groups have been used in the Scopus and Embase. The search was performed on 05 September 2020 by two independent researchers (MN and CRM), which also checked all the references in order to search for other potential articles. Then, the two reviewers (MN and CRM) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all articles identified in the literature search for inclusion. Disagreements regarding inclusion of articles were resolved by a third reviewer (PN).

Results

A total of 63 eligible studies were identified (PubMed, 22 studies; Scopus, 16 studies; Embase, 25 studies). After removing the duplicates and screening the titles and abstracts, six articles remained to be read in full text (). However, none of the articles achieved our criteria as all six studies were excluded because they were performed with adults.
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the selection criteria for the study.

PRISMA flow diagram of the selection criteria for the study.

Discussion

This lack of evidences on the influence of HIIT on adolescents’ bone health emphasize the need for further observational studies, as well as randomized clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of HIIT on bone health. In this regard, we believe to be relevant sharing our findings in this Narrative Review, because this presented knowledge gap may motivate further studies in this thematic and help to develop this research line. According to Yaffe et al. (24), reviews in which no study meets the eligibility criteria are also essential and need to be shared with the academic community because it may stimulate appropriate future investigations in this field. Given that (I) current recommendations suggest that vigorous intensity physical activity (10-13) for young people achieve large health benefits and reduce the risk of developing diseases later in life (11,14,15), including bone health (8,9), (II) HIIT may improve health-related outcomes (19,21-23,25,26), and (III) the development of bone health during childhood and adolescence is substantial and may be an important protective factor for osteoporosis and fractures (1), it becomes essential to understand HIIT effects on bone health in adolescents, specially nowadays when this type of exercise is on spotlight. Briefly, recent studies with adults showed that HIIT can be an effective way to improve BMC and BMD (27), and regular power-based training and competition in sprinting and jumping is associated with better maintenance of bone mass (28). As previous evidences have suggested (18), HIIT may also improve anthropometric variables, cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular functions, and mental health. Studies mainly with adults have shown a good adherence rate of ≥80% and HIIT appears to be safe, with no acute injuries or serious cardiovascular events, similar to other active controls (18). Despite this positive evidences, HIIT adherence and adverse events should be carefully addressed in adolescent populations, for both sexes as well as different puberty stages. Further recommendations as type of movement, exercise duration and frequency, and rest intervals remain unclear due to the lack of studies currently available (23). So, it is essential to understand more in-depth the HIIT effects on adolescents’ bone health because it may provide a pragmatic complement to the Physical Education lessons (25) and underpin the formulation of national guidelines. Moreover, it may provide essential information for public health programs, as well as contribute to developing more specific and effective sports training programs, mainly directed to the school environment. The article’s supplementary files as
  27 in total

Review 1.  Weight-bearing exercise and bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: a review of controlled trials.

Authors:  K Hind; M Burrows
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Is high-intensity interval training more effective on improving cardiometabolic risk and aerobic capacity than other forms of exercise in overweight and obese youth? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  A García-Hermoso; A J Cerrillo-Urbina; T Herrera-Valenzuela; C Cristi-Montero; J M Saavedra; V Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Bone Mass Development in Childhood and Its Association with Physical Activity and Vitamin D Levels. The CHAMPS-Study DK.

Authors:  Maria Sode Rønne; Malene Heidemann; Louise Lylloff; Anders J Schou; Jakob Tarp; Jens Ole Laursen; Niklas Rye Jørgensen; Steffen Husby; Niels Wedderkopp; Christian Mølgaard
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Influence of physical activity on bone strength in children and adolescents: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Vina P S Tan; Heather M Macdonald; SoJung Kim; Lindsay Nettlefold; Leigh Gabel; Maureen C Ashe; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT).

Authors:  Ricardo Borges Viana; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; James Steele; James Peter Fisher; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Greater maintenance of bone mineral content in male than female athletes and in sprinting and jumping than endurance athletes: a longitudinal study of bone strength in elite masters athletes.

Authors:  Alex Ireland; Uwe Mittag; Hans Degens; Dieter Felsenberg; José L Ferretti; Ari Heinonen; Erika Koltai; Marko T Korhonen; Jamie S McPhee; Igor Mekjavic; Jessica Piasecki; Rado Pisot; Zsolt Radak; Bostjan Simunic; Harri Suominen; Désirée C Wilks; Keith Winwood; Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Longitudinal changes in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Farooq; Anne Martin; Xanne Janssen; Mathew G Wilson; Ann-Marie Gibson; Adrienne Hughes; John J Reilly
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 9.213

8.  Physical activity intensity, bout-duration, and cardiometabolic risk markers in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jakob Tarp; Abbey Child; Tom White; Kate Westgate; Anna Bugge; Anders Grøntved; Niels Wedderkopp; Lars B Andersen; Greet Cardon; Rachel Davey; Kathleen F Janz; Susi Kriemler; Kate Northstone; Angie S Page; Jardena J Puder; John J Reilly; Luis B Sardinha; Esther M F van Sluijs; Ulf Ekelund; Katrien Wijndaele; Søren Brage
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  High-Intensity Interval Training Performed by Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Azad Engel; Alexander Ackermann; Hamdi Chtourou; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  How Physical Activity across the Lifespan Can Reduce the Impact of Bone Ageing: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Maria Felicia Faienza; Giuseppe Lassandro; Mariangela Chiarito; Federica Valente; Loredana Ciaccia; Paola Giordano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.