Literature DB >> 33633838

Energy-dependent protein folding: modeling how a protein folding machine may work.

Harutyun Sahakyan1, Karen Nazaryan1, Arcady Mushegian2,3, Irina Sorokina4.   

Abstract

Background: Proteins fold robustly and reproducibly in vivo, but many cannot fold in vitro in isolation from cellular components. Despite the remarkable progress that has been achieved by the artificial intelligence approaches in predicting the protein native conformations, the pathways that lead to such conformations, either in vitro or in vivo, remain largely unknown. The slow progress in recapitulating protein folding pathways in silico may be an indication of the fundamental deficiencies in our understanding of folding as it occurs in nature. Here we consider the possibility that protein folding in living cells may not be driven solely by the decrease in Gibbs free energy and propose that protein folding in vivo should be modeled as an active energy-dependent process. The mechanism of action of such a protein folding machine might include direct manipulation of the peptide backbone.
Methods: To show the feasibility of a protein folding machine, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations that were augmented by the application of mechanical force to rotate the C-terminal amino acid while simultaneously limiting the N-terminal amino acid movements.
Results: Remarkably, the addition of this simple manipulation of peptide backbones to the standard molecular dynamics simulation indeed facilitated the formation of native structures in five diverse alpha-helical peptides. Steric clashes that arise in the peptides due to the forced directional rotation resulted in the behavior of the peptide backbone no longer resembling a freely jointed chain. Conclusions: These simulations show the feasibility of a protein folding machine operating under the conditions when the movements of the polypeptide backbone are restricted by applying external forces and constraints. Further investigation is needed to see whether such an effect may play a role during co-translational protein folding in vivo and how it can be utilized to facilitate folding of proteins in artificial environments. Copyright:
© 2021 Sahakyan H et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Protein folding; chaperone; co-translational protein folding; computer modeling; energy-dependent protein folding; molecular dynamics; nascent peptide rotation; peptide backbone manipulation; protein folding machine; ribosome function

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633838      PMCID: PMC7898354          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.28175.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  44 in total

1.  Ribosomal elongation cycle: energetic, kinetic and stereochemical aspects.

Authors:  Valery I Lim; James F Curran; Maria B Garber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Energy barriers and driving forces in tRNA translocation through the ribosome.

Authors:  Lars V Bock; Christian Blau; Gunnar F Schröder; Iakov I Davydov; Niels Fischer; Holger Stark; Marina V Rodnina; Andrea C Vaiana; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Mutational analysis of protein folding inside the ribosome exit tunnel.

Authors:  José Arcadio Farías-Rico; Sara Kathrin Goetz; Jacopo Marino; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Principles that govern the folding of protein chains.

Authors:  C B Anfinsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.

Authors:  James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Cotranslational folding allows misfolding-prone proteins to circumvent deep kinetic traps.

Authors:  Amir Bitran; William M Jacobs; Xiadi Zhai; Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The role of the backbone torsion in protein folding.

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Modeling protein folding in vivo.

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Cotranslational Protein Folding inside the Ribosome Exit Tunnel.

Authors:  Ola B Nilsson; Rickard Hedman; Jacopo Marino; Stephan Wickles; Lukas Bischoff; Magnus Johansson; Annika Müller-Lucks; Fabio Trovato; Joseph D Puglisi; Edward P O'Brien; Roland Beckmann; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 10.  Review: Translational GTPases.

Authors:  Cristina Maracci; Marina V Rodnina
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.505

View more
  3 in total

1.  Statistical Evidence for a Helical Nascent Chain.

Authors:  Leonor Cruzeiro; Andrew C Gill; J Chris Eilbeck
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 2.  Is Protein Folding a Thermodynamically Unfavorable, Active, Energy-Dependent Process?

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady R Mushegian; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Regulation by Different Types of Chaperones of Amyloid Transformation of Proteins Involved in the Development of Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Vladimir I Muronetz; Sofia S Kudryavtseva; Evgeniia V Leisi; Lidia P Kurochkina; Kseniya V Barinova; Elena V Schmalhausen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.