Literature DB >> 33633630

What Got You Here, Won't Help You There: Changing Requirements in the Pre- Versus the Post-tenure Career Stage in Academia.

Stephanie K Rehbock1, Kristin Knipfer1, Claudia Peus1.   

Abstract

Despite efforts to foster gender equality in academia, women are vastly under-represented in tenured professorships, specifically in STEM disciplines. While previous research investigated structural and organizational barriers for women in academia, we explored professors' subjective view on attributes required before and after reaching tenure. The perspective of professors is needed as they are gatekeepers when it comes to the career advancement of junior researchers. Hence, we interviewed 25 tenured STEM professors in Germany about which attributes they personally consider to be required pre- versus post-tenure and analyzed whether these attributes are associated with gender stereotypes. We found that different attributes are mentioned in the pre- versus the post-tenure career stage and that the required attributes can be associated with gender stereotypes: While agentic-stereotypically male-attributes were mentioned more frequently than communal attributes in the pre-tenure career stage, communal-stereotypically female-attributes were reported slightly more often than agentic attributes after reaching tenure. Based on these novel findings, we discuss important implications for gender research and practice to contribute to more diversity and transparency in academic career advancement.
Copyright © 2021 Rehbock, Knipfer and Peus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEM; academia; academic career stages; academic gender gap; gender stereotypes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633630      PMCID: PMC7902061          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  8 in total

1.  STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes.

Authors:  Yi Xue; Richard C Larson
Journal:  Mon Labor Rev       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality.

Authors:  Danielle Gaucher; Justin Friesen; Aaron C Kay
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-07

3.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

Authors:  Alice H Eagly; Steven J Karau
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Examining Workplace Ostracism Experiences in Academia: Understanding How Differences in the Faculty Ranks Influence Inclusive Climates on Campus.

Authors:  Carla A Zimmerman; Adrienne R Carter-Sowell; Xiaohong Xu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-30

6.  A Leak in the Academic Pipeline: Identity and Health Among Postdoctoral Women.

Authors:  Renate Ysseldyk; Katharine H Greenaway; Elena Hassinger; Sarah Zutrauen; Jana Lintz; Maya P Bhatia; Margaret Frye; Else Starkenburg; Vera Tai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-06-04

7.  The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men's and Women's Characterizations of Others and Themselves.

Authors:  Tanja Hentschel; Madeline E Heilman; Claudia V Peus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  Accelerated Researchers: Psychosocial Risks in Gendered Institutions in Academia.

Authors:  Ester Conesa Carpintero; Ana M González Ramos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.