Literature DB >> 33633148

Superior predatory ability and abundance predicts potential ecological impact towards early-stage anurans by invasive 'Killer Shrimp' (Dikerogammarus villosus).

Daniel A Warren1,2, Stephanie J Bradbeer1, Alison M Dunn3,4.   

Abstract

Invasive alien species negatively impact upon biodiversity and generate significant economic costs worldwide. Globally, amphibians have suffered considerable losses, with a key driver being predation by large invasive invertebrate and vertebrate predators. However, there is no research regarding the potential ecological impact of small invertebrate invaders. The invasive freshwater amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus can act as a top predator capable of displacing native amphipods and preying heavily upon a range of native species. Listed as one of Europe's top 100 worst invaders, D. villosus has significantly restructured freshwater communities across western Europe and is expected to invade North America in the near future. Here we explore the ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon UK native and invasive amphibians (Rana temporaria and Xenopus laevis respectively) using the "Relative Impact Potential" (RIP) metric. By combining estimations of per capita effects (i.e. functional response; FR) and relative field abundances, we apply the RIP metric to quantify the potential ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon embryonic and larval amphibian prey, compared to the native amphipod Gammarus pulex. Both native and invasive amphipods consumed early-stage amphibians and exhibited potentially destabilising Type II FRs. However, larger body size in invasive D. villosus translated into a superior FR through significantly lower handling times and subsequently higher maximum feeding rates-up to seven times greater than native G. pulex. Higher invader abundance also drove elevated RIP scores for invasive D. villosus, with potential impact scores predicted up to 15.4 times greater than native G. pulex. Overall, D. villosus is predicted to have a greater predatory impact upon amphibian populations than G. pulex, due primarily to its larger body size and superior field abundance, potentially reducing amphibian recruitment within invaded regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633148      PMCID: PMC7907340          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82630-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  23 in total

1.  Ecology: Bleak future for amphibians.

Authors:  Ross A Alford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians.

Authors:  John Alroy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions.

Authors:  C Bellard; P Genovesi; J M Jeschke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.

Authors:  Olivera Vucic-Pestic; Björn C Rall; Gregor Kalinkat; Ulrich Brose
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species.

Authors:  J T Dick; D Platvoet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Chytrid fungi and global amphibian declines.

Authors:  Matthew C Fisher; Trenton W J Garner
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 7.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

8.  Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods.

Authors:  Loic Bollache; Jaimie T A Dick; Keith D Farnsworth; W Ian Montgomery
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Size matters: predation of fish eggs and larvae by native and invasive amphipods.

Authors:  N G Taylor; A M Dunn
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  A behaviorally related developmental switch in nitrergic modulation of locomotor rhythmogenesis in larval Xenopus tadpoles.

Authors:  Stephen P Currie; Denis Combes; Nicholas W Scott; John Simmers; Keith T Sillar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.