Literature DB >> 33632750

Factors that influence patient preferences for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: a qualitative study.

Anthony W Gilbert1,2,3, Jeremy Jones2, Maria Stokes2,4, Carl R May3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify, characterise and explain factors that influence patient preferences, from the perspective of patients and clinicians, for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and abductive analysis.
SETTING: A physiotherapy and occupational therapy department situated within a tertiary orthopaedic centre in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were receiving orthopaedic rehabilitation for a musculoskeletal problem. Occupational therapists, physiotherapists or therapy technicians involved in the delivery of orthopaedic rehabilitation for patients with a musculoskeletal problem.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients and 22 healthcare professionals were interviewed. The average interview length was 48 minutes. Four major factors were found to influence preference: the situation of care (the ways that patients understand and explain their clinical status, their treatment requirements and the care pathway), the expectations of care (influenced by a patients desire for contact, psychological status, previous care and perceived requirements), the demands on the patient (due to each patients respective social situation and the consequences of choice) and the capacity to allocate resources to care (these include financial, infrastructural, social and healthcare resources).
CONCLUSION: This study has identified key factors that appear to influence patient preference for virtual consultations in orthopaedic rehabilitation. A conceptual model of these factors, derived from empirical data, has been developed highlighting how they combine and compete. A series of questions, based on these factors, have been developed to support identification of preferences in a clinical setting. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services administration & management; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; qualitative research

Year:  2021        PMID: 33632750      PMCID: PMC7908916          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  27 in total

Review 1.  Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?

Authors:  M A Hall; E Dugan; B Zheng; A K Mishra
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Video consultations for covid-19.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Joe Wherton; Sara Shaw; Clare Morrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-12

3.  A Telemedicine Service as Partial Replacement of Face-to-Face Physical Rehabilitation: The Relevance of Use.

Authors:  Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink; Rianne Huis In 't Veld; Hermie Hermens; Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Investigating the preferences of older people for telehealth as a new model of health care service delivery: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Julie Ratcliffe; Wendy Shulver; Maggie Killington; Alan Taylor; Maria Crotty; Colin Carati; Jennifer Tieman; Victoria Wade; Michael R Kidd
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  What is the acceptability of real time 1:1 videoconferencing between clinicians and patients for a follow-up consultation for multi-directional shoulder instability?

Authors:  Anthony W Gilbert; Anju Jaggi; Carl R May
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-11

6.  Real-World Implementation of Video Outpatient Consultations at Macro, Meso, and Micro Levels: Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Sara Shaw; Joseph Wherton; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Joanne Morris; Satya Bhattacharya; Philippa Hanson; Desirée Campbell-Richards; Seendy Ramoutar; Anna Collard; Isabel Hodkinson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Patients and informal caregivers' experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kate Alice Lippiett; Alison Richardson; Michelle Myall; Amanda Cummings; Carl R May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Towards a general theory of implementation.

Authors:  Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness.

Authors:  Carl R May; David T Eton; Kasey Boehmer; Katie Gallacher; Katherine Hunt; Sara MacDonald; Frances S Mair; Christine M May; Victor M Montori; Alison Richardson; Anne E Rogers; Nathan Shippee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Protocol for the CONNECT project: a mixed methods study investigating patient preferences for communication technology use in orthopaedic rehabilitation consultations.

Authors:  Anthony William Gilbert; Jeremy Jones; Maria Stokes; Emmanouil Mentzakis; Carl R May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient, clinician and manager experience of the accelerated implementation of virtual consultations following COVID-19: A qualitative study of preferences in a tertiary orthopaedic rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  Anthony W Gilbert; Jeremy Jones; Maria Stokes; Carl R May
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Using Linguistic Ethnography to Study Video Consultations: A Call to Action and Future Research Agenda.

Authors:  Lucas M Seuren; Sara E Shaw
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  The perceived quality of video consultations in geriatric outpatient care by early adopters.

Authors:  Romy Spronk; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Nicole Bottenberg-Wigbold; Nadine Bovee; Rosalinde Smits; Marjolein van Offenbeek; Janita F J Vos; Marie Louise Luttik; Barbara C van Munster
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.269

4.  Patient preferences for use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: Results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Anthony W Gilbert; Emmanouil Mentzakis; Carl R May; Maria Stokes; Jeremy Jones
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2021-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.