BACKGROUND: Different kinds of telemedicine services have made their entry into healthcare. In this article we focus on a telerehabilitation service for physical exercise, designed and implemented as partial replacement of a 3-day outpatient rehabilitation program for chronic disease patients. The aim of this article is to examine the use pattern of this telerehabilitation service by chronic disease patients and to examine the association between actual use and clinical benefit experienced by these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) patients and pulmonary disease (PD) patients referred to the physical outpatient rehabilitation programs were asked to participate in and to use the telerehabilitation service. The actual use was expressed as frequency and duration of use, and the measurement of clinical benefit focused on complaints and physical functioning. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients finished the outpatient rehabilitation using the telerehabilitation service. During the weeks of home rehabilitation the majority of the patients used the service. On average the service was used one or two times a week for a total of 35-38 min for both pathologies, with this value being lower than the time that was replaced. Frequency of use was significantly associated with the change in physical functioning outcome for both pathologies (CLBP, r=0.41, p=0.02; PD, r=0.55, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic disease patients used a telerehabilitation service as partial replacement of their face-to-face rehabilitation program, and more frequent use was positively related to higher clinical benefit.
BACKGROUND: Different kinds of telemedicine services have made their entry into healthcare. In this article we focus on a telerehabilitation service for physical exercise, designed and implemented as partial replacement of a 3-day outpatient rehabilitation program for chronic diseasepatients. The aim of this article is to examine the use pattern of this telerehabilitation service by chronic diseasepatients and to examine the association between actual use and clinical benefit experienced by these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) patients and pulmonary disease (PD) patients referred to the physical outpatient rehabilitation programs were asked to participate in and to use the telerehabilitation service. The actual use was expressed as frequency and duration of use, and the measurement of clinical benefit focused on complaints and physical functioning. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients finished the outpatient rehabilitation using the telerehabilitation service. During the weeks of home rehabilitation the majority of the patients used the service. On average the service was used one or two times a week for a total of 35-38 min for both pathologies, with this value being lower than the time that was replaced. Frequency of use was significantly associated with the change in physical functioning outcome for both pathologies (CLBP, r=0.41, p=0.02; PD, r=0.55, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Chronic diseasepatients used a telerehabilitation service as partial replacement of their face-to-face rehabilitation program, and more frequent use was positively related to higher clinical benefit.
Authors: Ali Jasem Buabbas; Sarah Ebraheem Albahrouh; Hesham N Alrowayeh; Hamza Alshawaf Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 2.132
Authors: Fahad Saad Algarni; Majed O Alshammari; Umkalthoum Sidimohammad; Sarah A Khayat; Abdullah Aljabbary; Abdulrahman Mohammed Altowaijri Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-10-06