Literature DB >> 33632191

Biomechanical properties of the bone during implant placement.

Ádám László Nagy1, Zsolt Tóth2, Tamás Tarjányi2, Nándor Tamás Práger3, Zoltán Lajos Baráth3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this research the biomechanical properties of a bone model was examined. Porcine ribs are used as experimental model. The objective of this research was to investigate and compare the biomechanical properties of the bone model before and after implant placement.
METHODS: The bone samples were divided in three groups, Group 1 where ALL-ON-FOUR protocol was used during pre-drilling and placing the implants, Group 2 where ALL-ON-FOUR protocol was used during pre-drilling, and implants were not placed, and Group 3 consisting of intact bones served as a control group. Static and dynamic loading was applied for examining the model samples. Kruskal-Wallis statistical test and as a post-hoc test Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyze experimental results.
RESULTS: According to the results of the static loading, there was no significant difference between the implanted and original ribs, however, the toughness values of the bones decreased largely on account of predrilling the bones. The analysis of dynamic fatigue measurements by Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between the intact and predrilled bones.
CONCLUSION: The pre-drilled bone was much weaker in both static and dynamic tests than the natural or implanted specimens. According to the results of the dynamic tests and after a certain loading cycle the implanted samples behaved the same way as the control samples, which suggests that implantation have stabilized the skeletal bone structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Dental implant(s); Fixed and removable prosthodontics; Implant dentistry/implantology; Jaw biomechanics; Oral and maxillofacial surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33632191      PMCID: PMC7908763          DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01442-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Oral Health        ISSN: 1472-6831            Impact factor:   2.757


  28 in total

1.  Mechanical behavior of human trabecular bone after overloading.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; E F Wachtel; D L Kopperdahl
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison.

Authors:  P Trisi; W Rao
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Paulo Maló; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Bo Rangert
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  All-on-4 concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Horizontal ridge augmentation in conjunction with or prior to implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ulrike Kuchler; Thomas von Arx
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Improving the estimate of the effective elastic modulus derived from three-point bending tests of long bones.

Authors:  Lampros C Kourtis; Dennis R Carter; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Three-point bending of rat femur in the mediolateral direction: introduction and validation of a novel biomechanical testing protocol.

Authors:  Olli Leppänen; Harri Sievänen; Jarkko Jokihaara; Ilari Pajamäki; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: an in vitro study in pig ribs.

Authors:  B Friberg; L Sennerby; J Roos; P Johansson; C G Strid; U Lekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Elastic properties and apparent density of human edentulous maxilla and mandible.

Authors:  W-J Seong; U-K Kim; J Q Swift; Y-C Heo; J S Hodges; C-C Ko
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugiura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Sadami Tsutsumi; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.614

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distally Tilted Implants According to the All-on-Four® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of Complete Edentulism: A 3.5-Year Retrospective Radiographic Study of Clinical Outcomes and Marginal Bone Level Changes.

Authors:  Árpád László Szabó; Ádám László Nagy; Csaba Lászlófy; Márió Gajdács; Péter Bencsik; Krisztina Kárpáti; Zoltán Baráth
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.