Literature DB >> 33632129

Accuracy of urine flow cytometry and urine test strip in predicting relevant bacteriuria in different patient populations.

Stefano Bassetti1,2, Adrian Egli3,4,5, Christian Gehringer1,6,2, Axel Regeniter7, Katharina Rentsch8, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is diagnosed combining urinary symptoms with demonstration of urine culture growth above a given threshold. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Urine Flow Cytometry (UFC) with urine test strip in predicting bacterial growth and in identifying contaminated urine samples, and to derive an algorithm to identify relevant bacterial growth for clinical use.
METHODS: Species identification and colony-forming unit (CFU/ml) quantification from bacterial cultures were matched to corresponding cellular (leucocytes/epithelial cells) and bacteria counts per μl. Results comprise samples analysed between 2013 and 2015 for which urine culture (reference standard) and UFC and urine test strip data (index tests, Sysmex UX-2000) were available.
RESULTS: 47,572 urine samples of 26,256 patients were analysed. Bacteria counts used to predict bacterial growth of ≥105 CFU/ml showed an accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of > 93% compared to 82% using leukocyte counts. The relevant bacteriuria rule-out cut-off of 50 bacteria/μl reached a negative predictive value of 98, 91 and 89% and the rule-in cut-off of 250 bacteria/μl identified relevant bacteriuria with an overall positive predictive value of 67, 72 and 73% for microbiologically defined bacteriuria thresholds of 105, 104 or 103 CFU/ml, respectively. Measured epithelial cell counts by UFC could not identify contaminated urine.
CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of a relevant bacterial growth by bacteria counts was most accurate and was a better predictor than leucocyte counts independently of the source of the urine and the medical specialty ordering the test (medical, surgical or others).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria count; Diagnosis; Flow Cytometry; Urinalysis; Urinary tract infection; Urine test strip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33632129      PMCID: PMC7908726          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-05893-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


  17 in total

Review 1.  Global epidemiology of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Zafer Tandogdu; Florian M E Wagenlehner
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.915

2.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Teresa C Horan; Mary Andrus; Margaret A Dudeck
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology.

Authors:  J Michael Miller; Matthew J Binnicker; Sheldon Campbell; Karen C Carroll; Kimberle C Chapin; Peter H Gilligan; Mark D Gonzalez; Robert C Jerris; Sue C Kehl; Robin Patel; Bobbi S Pritt; Sandra S Richter; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Joseph D Schwartzman; James W Snyder; Sam Telford; Elitza S Theel; Richard B Thomson; Melvin P Weinstein; Joseph D Yao
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Urine flow cytometry can rule out urinary tract infection, but cannot identify bacterial morphologies correctly.

Authors:  N Geerts; A R Jansz; K J M Boonen; R P W F Wijn; E L Koldewijn; A K Boer; V Scharnhorst
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture.

Authors:  Santra Jolkkonen; Eeva-Liisa Paattiniemi; Pauliina Kärpänoja; Hannu Sarkkinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Overestimation error and unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions for acute cystitis in adult women.

Authors:  Warren J McIsaac; Cheryl L Hunchak
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Estimating the effects of nosocomial infections on the length of hospitalization.

Authors:  M S Green; E Rubinstein; P Amit
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of flow cytometry in urinary tract infection screening.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Shang; Qian-Qian Wang; Jian-Rong Zhang; Yu-Lian Xu; Wei-Wei Zhang; Yan Chen; Ming-Li Gu; Zhi-De Hu; An-Mei Deng
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Urine flow cytometry as a primary screening method to exclude urinary tract infections.

Authors:  K J M Boonen; E L Koldewijn; N L A Arents; P A M Raaymakers; V Scharnhorst
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.