Literature DB >> 33631781

Addressing Unmet Basic Needs to Improve Colposcopy Adherence Among Women With Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening.

Lindsay Kuroki1, L Stewart Massad1, Anne Martin2, Jingxia Liu3, Dominique Brown4, Andrea Leon5, Kathleen Groesch, Teresa Wilson, Yahia Zeino2, Paula Diaz-Sylvester, Kristin Delfino6, Katherine Hyon2, Matthew Kreuter4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to identify unmet basic needs (BNs) among women referred to colposcopy, to assess patient acceptability/satisfaction with assistance from a navigator to address unmet BNs, and to estimate adherence to colposcopy.
METHODS: Women were recruited between September 2017 and January 2019 from 2 academic colposcopy centers, one serving a rural and one an urban area. Basic needs were assessed by phone before colposcopy appointments and considered unmet if unlikely to resolve in 1 month. Colposcopy adherence prestudy and poststudy implementation was abstracted over 4-6 months from administrative records. After a lead-in phase of 25 patients at each site, a BN navigator was offered to new participants with 1 or more unmet BNs. Primary outcome was adherence to initial appointment.
RESULTS: Among 100 women, 59% had 1 or more unmet BNs, with similar prevalence between urban and rural sites. Adherence to initial colposcopy was 83% overall, 72% at the rural clinic, and 94% at the urban clinic (p = .006). These adherence rates were improved from 4 months before study launch (30/59 [51%] rural clinic and 68/137 [50%] urban clinic). Although acceptability of BN navigation was greater than 96% and women felt that it helped them get to their colposcopy visit, having a navigator was not associated with adherence. Women reporting no unmet BNs had the lowest adherence compared with women with 1 or more unmet BNs, regardless of navigator assistance (p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Disadvantaged women who need colposcopy have unmet BNs and value navigator assistance for initial appointments. However, when appointment scheduling includes telephone reminders and inquiring about BNs, a navigator may not add value.
Copyright © 2021, ASCCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33631781      PMCID: PMC7987876          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   3.842


  28 in total

Review 1.  Triple jeopardy: rural, poor, and uninsured.

Authors:  D Rowland; B Lyons
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of mortality among community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Dan G Blazer; Natalie Sachs-Ericsson; Celia F Hybels
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Geographic disparities in cervical cancer mortality: what are the roles of risk factor prevalence, screening, and use of recommended treatment?

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; William F Lawrence; Jason C King; Patricia Mangan; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Bin Yi; Jon F Kerner; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Barriers to follow-up of an abnormal Pap smear in Latina women referred for colposcopy.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Leslie S Aldrich; Gloria B Gamba; Adriana M Bearse; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Specialized tobacco quitline and basic needs navigation interventions to increase cessation among low income smokers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Christina Roberts; Rachel Garg; Charlene Caburnay; Qiang Fu; Jacob Gordon; Terry Bush; Robin Pokojski; Tess Thompson; Matthew Kreuter
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Rural-urban trends and patterns in cervical cancer mortality, incidence, stage, and survival in the United States, 1950-2008.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-02

8.  Physician and patient factors associated with follow up of high grade dysplasias of the cervix: a population-based study.

Authors:  Rachel Kupets; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Use of cancer control referrals by 2-1-1 callers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Katherine S Eddens; Kassandra I Alcaraz; Suchitra Rath; Choi Lai; Nikki Caito; Regina Greer; Nikisha Bridges; Jason Q Purnell; Anjanette Wells; Qiang Fu; Colleen Walsh; Erin Eckstein; Julia Griffith; Alissa Nelson; Cicely Paine; Tiffany Aziz; Anne M Roux
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women.

Authors:  C Lerman; P Hanjani; C Caputo; S Miller; E Delmoor; S Nolte; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in cervical cancer screening barriers and intentions: The My Body My Test-3 HPV self-collection trial among under-screened, low-income women.

Authors:  Erica E Zeno; Noel T Brewer; Lisa P Spees; Andrea C Des Marais; Busola O Sanusi; Michael G Hudgens; Sarah Jackson; Lynn Barclay; Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.