| Literature DB >> 30904596 |
Amy McQueen1, Christina Roberts2, Rachel Garg2, Charlene Caburnay2, Qiang Fu3, Jacob Gordon2, Terry Bush4, Robin Pokojski5, Tess Thompson2, Matthew Kreuter2.
Abstract
Smoking in the United States follows a clear socioeconomic gradient: low-income Americans smoke more and quit less than those with more education and income. Evidence-based interventions like tobacco quitlines are designed to make effective cessation services available on a population basis to all smokers. However, these interventions do not address many of the unique challenges faced by low-income smokers, including unmet basic needs like food, housing, personal safety and money for necessities that often supersede health needs. Research is needed to maximize the use and effectiveness of tobacco quitlines in low-income populations. This paper details the rationale, design and methods for a 2 × 2 randomized controlled trial currently underway comparing the effects of Standard and Specialized Tobacco Quitlines with and without Basic Needs Navigation on intervention engagement and smoking cessation among low-income smokers. Smokers are recruited from United Way 2-1-1 in Missouri and all participants receive tobacco quitline services from Optum. Quitline and navigation services are provided for 3 months. Participants complete telephone surveys at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow up. The primary study outcome is self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow up. Embedding the study in practice agencies will accelerate dissemination and scalability should our findings demonstrate intervention effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Behavior change; Behavioral intervention; Clinical protocols; Health disparities; Minority health; Smoking cessation
Year: 2019 PMID: 30904596 PMCID: PMC6546421 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Trials ISSN: 1551-7144 Impact factor: 2.226