Bijal A Parikh1, Meghan A Wallace1, Broc T McCune2, Carey-Ann D Burnham1, Neil W Anderson1. 1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Widespread testing of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in shortages of collection devices and transport media. We evaluated the stability of flocked swabs inoculated with SARS-CoV-2-containing specimen incubated dry (i.e. without transport medium) at room temperature. METHODS: A pool of SARS-CoV-2 positive specimen was used to inoculate flocked swabs. Five swabs were placed immediately into UTM following inoculation, and tested immediately (day 0). Fifteen of the swabs were placed into sterile 15 mL conical tubes and incubated at room temperature for one, two, or seven days. Following incubation, swabs were hydrated in separate vials of UTM and tested. This protocol was repeated for viral transport media (VTM) and saline. As a comparison, a series of swabs was prepared and tested in parallel, but stored in the corresponding liquid transport media (UTM, VTM, or saline) and incubated at room temperature. Testing was performed at 1, 2, and 7 days post inoculation in duplicate. All molecular testing was performed using the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay. RESULTS: All dry swabs tested at days 1, 2, and 7 provided results that were within two cycle thresholds (Cts) of the average Ct values for swabs hydrated in the same media and tested on day 0. There was no statistical difference in Ct values between swabs incubated in liquid media versus dry swabs incubated at room temperature prior to hydration in liquid media. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of "dry swabs" may simplify specimen collection, negate the need for liquid transport media, and mitigate safety risks while preserving the accuracy of testing.
BACKGROUND: Widespread testing of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in shortages of collection devices and transport media. We evaluated the stability of flocked swabs inoculated with SARS-CoV-2-containing specimen incubated dry (i.e. without transport medium) at room temperature. METHODS: A pool of SARS-CoV-2 positive specimen was used to inoculate flocked swabs. Five swabs were placed immediately into UTM following inoculation, and tested immediately (day 0). Fifteen of the swabs were placed into sterile 15 mL conical tubes and incubated at room temperature for one, two, or seven days. Following incubation, swabs were hydrated in separate vials of UTM and tested. This protocol was repeated for viral transport media (VTM) and saline. As a comparison, a series of swabs was prepared and tested in parallel, but stored in the corresponding liquid transport media (UTM, VTM, or saline) and incubated at room temperature. Testing was performed at 1, 2, and 7 days post inoculation in duplicate. All molecular testing was performed using the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assay. RESULTS: All dry swabs tested at days 1, 2, and 7 provided results that were within two cycle thresholds (Cts) of the average Ct values for swabs hydrated in the same media and tested on day 0. There was no statistical difference in Ct values between swabs incubated in liquid media versus dry swabs incubated at room temperature prior to hydration in liquid media. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of "dry swabs" may simplify specimen collection, negate the need for liquid transport media, and mitigate safety risks while preserving the accuracy of testing.
Authors: Silvia Würstle; Christoph D Spinner; Florian Voit; Dieter Hoffmann; Svenja Hering; Simon Weidlich; Jochen Schneider; Alexander Zink; Matthias Treiber; Roman Iakoubov; Roland M Schmid; Ulrike Protzer; Johanna Erber Journal: Infection Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Sandra S Chaves; Ju-Hyeong Park; Mila M Prill; Brett Whitaker; Reena Park; Ginger L Chew Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lucy Mosscrop; Patricia Watber; Paul Elliot; Graham Cooke; Wendy Barclay; Paul S Freemont; Carolina Rosadas; Graham P Taylor Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 2.623
Authors: Sanjay Srivatsan; Sarah Heidl; Brian Pfau; Beth K Martin; Peter D Han; Weizhi Zhong; Katrina van Raay; Evan McDermot; Jordan Opsahl; Luis Gamboa; Nahum Smith; Melissa Truong; Shari Cho; Kaitlyn A Barrow; Lucille M Rich; Jeremy Stone; Caitlin R Wolf; Denise J McCulloch; Ashley E Kim; Elisabeth Brandstetter; Sarah L Sohlberg; Misja Ilcisin; Rachel E Geyer; Wei Chen; Jase Gehring; Sriram Kosuri; Trevor Bedford; Mark J Rieder; Deborah A Nickerson; Helen Y Chu; Eric Q Konnick; Jason S Debley; Jay Shendure; Christina M Lockwood; Lea M Starita Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 8.327