| Literature DB >> 32209336 |
Abstract
Two experiments examined factors controlling human free-operant performance in relation to predictions based on the nature of bout-initiation and within-bout responding. Overall, responding was higher for a random ratio (RR) than a random interval (RI) schedule, with equal rates of reinforcement. Bout-initiation rates were not different across the two schedules, but within-bout rates were higher on the RR schedule. Response cost reduced overall rates of responding, but tended to suppress bout-initiation responding more than within-bout responding (Experiments 1 & 2). In contrast, reinforcement magnitude increased all forms of responding (Experiment 2). One explanation consistent with these effects is that bout-initiation responses are controlled by overall rates of reinforcement through their impact on the context (i.e. are stimulus-driven), but that within-bout responses are controlled by response reinforcement (i.e. are goal-directed). These current findings are discussed in the light of these theoretical suggestions.Entities:
Keywords: Actions and habits; Bout-initiation; Humans; Reinforcement magnitude; Response cost; Schedules of reinforcement; Within-bout responding
Year: 2020 PMID: 32209336 DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Processes ISSN: 0376-6357 Impact factor: 1.777