Literature DB >> 33628688

Impact of Match Violations on Applicants' Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs.

Reesa L Monir1, Kristina Michaudet2, Joseph G Monir3, Kiarash P Rahmanian4, Charlie Michaudet5, Lou Ann Cooper6, Heather Harrell7.   

Abstract

Introduction The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) requires all Match participants to adhere to a strict code of conduct known as the Match Participation Agreement, yet Match violations continue to occur. We sought to determine how interview experiences, including Match violations, impact applicants' perceptions and rankings of residency programs. Methods An electronic survey was sent to all accredited medical school Deans of Student Affairs and Association of American Medical Colleges Student Representatives for distribution to fourth-year medical students. Questions assessed pressures that residency programs placed on applicants during interview season and their impact on applicants. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Results Of the 433 included respondents, 31.2% (n = 135) reported breaches of the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. Of those, 63% (n = 85) had a negative perception of the violating programs, and 37.8% (n = 51) were less likely to rank those programs highly. Violations included asking applicants about the locations of their other interviews (60.3%, n = 261), pressuring applicants to reveal their ranking (24.0%, n = 104), explicitly requesting applicants to reveal their ranking (6.5%, n = 28), asking applicants to provide a commitment before Match day (3.9%, n = 17), and other behavior that was felt to ignore the spirit of the Match (16.4%, n = 71). Implying that applicants would match into a program if they ranked it highly (37.2%, n = 161) was received positively by 65.2% (n = 105) of applicants experiencing this breach, with 42.2% (n = 68) ranking the program more highly. Three major themes impacting applicants' impressions of residency programs emerged from the qualitative data: interview experience, professionalism, and post-interview communication (PIC). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that PIC should either be eliminated or that programs should set clear expectations for PIC. Conclusions Match violations continue to occur, despite the NRMP Match Participation Agreement. With the notable exception of communication implying that applicants would match into a program, applicants overwhelmingly view programs that commit these violations negatively and often rank these programs lower as a result.
Copyright © 2021, Monir et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  applicants; interviews; match; medical school; nrmp; residency; violations

Year:  2021        PMID: 33628688      PMCID: PMC7895534          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  17 in total

1.  Compliance with national resident matching program policy: understanding the terms and conditions of the match participation agreement.

Authors:  Laurie S Curtin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.

Authors:  Emma B Holliday; Charles R Thomas; Aaron S Kusano
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Christopher J Neylan; Arnav Srivastava; Shashank S Pandya; Amy Kaplan; Kushan D Radadia; Eric A Singer; Sammy E Elsamra
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?

Authors:  Elisabeth M Sebesta; Michael J Lipsky; Michele Nunez; Kimberly L Cooper; Gina M Badalato
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Orthopedic Surgery Applicants: What They Want in an Interview and How They Are Influenced by Post-Interview Contact.

Authors:  Christopher L Camp; Paul L Sousa; Arlen D Hanssen; Matthew D Karam; George J Haidukewych; Daniel A Oakes; Norman S Turner
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Postinterview Communications: Two Surveys of Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors Before and After Guideline Implementation.

Authors:  Karen M Chacko; Shalini Reddy; Michael Kisielewski; Stephanie Call; Lisa L Willett; Saima Chaudhry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.

Authors:  Rebecca S Harvey; Kevin J Kovatch; Mark E P Prince; Kelly M Malloy; Marc C Thorne
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Fixing the "match": how to play the game.

Authors:  Purushottam A Nagarkar; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

9.  Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists.

Authors:  H Gene Hern; Brian Johnson; Harrison J Alter; Charlotte P Wills; Eric R Snoey; Barry C Simon
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-25

10.  Post-interview Thank-you Communications Influence Both Applicant and Residency Program Rank Lists in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Corlin Jewell; Tillman David; Aaron Kraut; Jamie Hess; Mary Westergaard; Benjamin H Schnapp
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.