Literature DB >> 33625898

Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis of Scarring with Emphasis on Burns: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Peter D'Arpa1, Kai P Leung2.   

Abstract

Significance: The worldwide estimate of burns requiring medical attention each year is 11 million. Each year in the United States, ∼486,000 burn injuries receive medical attention, including 40,000 hospitalizations. Scars resulting from burns can be disfiguring and impair functions. The development of prophylactic drugs for cutaneous scarring could improve the outcomes for burns, traumatic lacerations (>6 million/year treated in U.S. emergency rooms), and surgical incisions (∼250 million/year worldwide). Antiscar pharmaceuticals have been estimated to have a market of $12 billion. Recent Advances: Many small molecules, cells, proteins/polypeptides, and nucleic acids have mitigated scarring in animal studies and clinical trials, but none have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval yet. Critical Issues: The development of antiscar pharmaceuticals involves the identification of the proper dose, frequency of application, and window of administration postwounding for the indicated wound. Risks of infection and impaired healing must be considered. Scar outcome needs to be evaluated after scars have matured. Future Directions: Once treatments have demonstrated safety and efficacy in rodent and/or rabbit and porcine wound models, human testing can begin, such as on artificially created wounds on healthy subjects and on bilateral-surgical wounds, comparing treatments versus vehicle controls on intrapatient-matched wounds, before testing on separate cohorts of patients. Given the progress made in the past 20 years, FDA-approved drugs for improving scar outcomes may be expected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopharmaceuticals; burns; drugs; pharmaceuticals; scars; wounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33625898      PMCID: PMC9142134          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2020.1236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.947


  107 in total

1.  Inhibition of procollagen C-proteinase reduces scar hypertrophy in a rabbit model of cutaneous scarring.

Authors:  Russell R Reid; Jon E Mogford; Richard Butt; Alex deGiorgio-Miller; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of imiquimod applied to postsurgical excisions on scar cosmesis.

Authors:  Brian Berman; Stacy Frankel; Adriana M Villa; Claudia C Ramirez; Varee Poochareon; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Cx43-Mimetic Peptide in Cutaneous Scarring.

Authors:  Christina L Grek; Jade Montgomery; Meenakshi Sharma; A Ravi; J S Rajkumar; Kurtis E Moyer; Robert G Gourdie; Gautam S Ghatnekar
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Antifibrogenic effects of liposome-encapsulated IFN-alpha2b cream on skin wounds in a fibrotic rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Jonathan P Lee; Reza B Jalili; Edward E Tredget; Jack R Demare; Aziz Ghahary
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 5.  Cutaneous Scarring: Basic Science, Current Treatments, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Clement D Marshall; Michael S Hu; Tripp Leavitt; Leandra A Barnes; H Peter Lorenz; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Hepatocyte growth factor reduces hypertrophy of skin scar: in vivo study.

Authors:  Zhibo Xiao; Chen Xi
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Mesenchymal stromal cells from dermal and adipose tissues induce macrophage polarization to a pro-repair phenotype and improve skin wound healing.

Authors:  Helena Debiazi Zomer; Talita da Silva Jeremias; Buddy Ratner; Andrea Goncalves Trentin
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.414

8.  Use of platelet-rich plasma in deep second- and third-degree burns.

Authors:  Neil Grant Venter; Ruy Garcia Marques; Jeanine Salles Dos Santos; Andréa Monte-Alto-Costa
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Is PRP Effective in Reducing the Scar Width of Primary Cleft Lip Repair? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Authors:  Shaimaa Mohsen Refahee; Mamdouh A Aboulhassan; Omniya Abdel Aziz; Dawlat Emara; Hadeel M Seif El Dein; Basma Gamal Moussa; Malek Abu Sneineh
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-10-30

10.  Blockade of mast cell activation reduces cutaneous scar formation.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Megan E Schrementi; Matthew J Ranzer; Traci A Wilgus; Luisa A DiPietro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.