| Literature DB >> 33623042 |
James S Clark1,2, Robert Andrus3, Melaine Aubry-Kientz4, Yves Bergeron5, Michal Bogdziewicz6, Don C Bragg7, Dale Brockway8, Natalie L Cleavitt9, Susan Cohen10, Benoit Courbaud11, Robert Daley12, Adrian J Das13, Michael Dietze14, Timothy J Fahey8, Istem Fer15, Jerry F Franklin16, Catherine A Gehring17, Gregory S Gilbert18, Cathryn H Greenberg19, Qinfeng Guo20, Janneke HilleRisLambers21, Ines Ibanez22, Jill Johnstone23, Christopher L Kilner24, Johannes Knops25, Walter D Koenig26, Georges Kunstler11, Jalene M LaMontagne27, Kristin L Legg12, Jordan Luongo24, James A Lutz28, Diana Macias29, Eliot J B McIntire30, Yassine Messaoud31, Christopher M Moore32, Emily Moran3, Jonathan A Myers33, Orrin B Myers34, Chase Nunez35, Robert Parmenter36, Sam Pearse37, Scott Pearson38, Renata Poulton-Kamakura24, Ethan Ready24, Miranda D Redmond39, Chantal D Reid24, Kyle C Rodman11, C Lane Scher24, William H Schlesinger24, Amanda M Schwantes40, Erin Shanahan12, Shubhi Sharma24, Michael A Steele41, Nathan L Stephenson13, Samantha Sutton24, Jennifer J Swenson24, Margaret Swift24, Thomas T Veblen11, Amy V Whipple17, Thomas G Whitham17, Andreas P Wion39, Kai Zhu18, Roman Zlotin42.
Abstract
Indirect climate effects on tree fecundity that come through variation in size and growth (climate-condition interactions) are not currently part of models used to predict future forests. Trends in species abundances predicted from meta-analyses and species distribution models will be misleading if they depend on the conditions of individuals. Here we find from a synthesis of tree species in North America that climate-condition interactions dominate responses through two pathways, i) effects of growth that depend on climate, and ii) effects of climate that depend on tree size. Because tree fecundity first increases and then declines with size, climate change that stimulates growth promotes a shift of small trees to more fecund sizes, but the opposite can be true for large sizes. Change the depresses growth also affects fecundity. We find a biogeographic divide, with these interactions reducing fecundity in the West and increasing it in the East. Continental-scale responses of these forests are thus driven largely by indirect effects, recommending management for climate change that considers multiple demographic rates.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33623042 PMCID: PMC7902660 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20836-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919