Literature DB >> 31666721

Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers.

Sebastian Seibold1,2, Martin M Gossner3, Nadja K Simons4,5, Nico Blüthgen5, Jörg Müller6,7, Didem Ambarlı4,8, Christian Ammer9, Jürgen Bauhus10, Markus Fischer11, Jan C Habel4,12, Karl Eduard Linsenmair13, Thomas Nauss14, Caterina Penone11, Daniel Prati11, Peter Schall9, Ernst-Detlef Schulze15, Juliane Vogt4, Stephan Wöllauer14, Wolfgang W Weisser4.   

Abstract

Recent reports of local extinctions of arthropod species1, and of massive declines in arthropod biomass2, point to land-use intensification as a major driver of decreasing biodiversity. However, to our knowledge, there are no multisite time series of arthropod occurrences across gradients of land-use intensity with which to confirm causal relationships. Moreover, it remains unclear which land-use types and arthropod groups are affected, and whether the observed declines in biomass and diversity are linked to one another. Here we analyse data from more than 1 million individual arthropods (about 2,700 species), from standardized inventories taken between 2008 and 2017 at 150 grassland and 140 forest sites in 3 regions of Germany. Overall gamma diversity in grasslands and forests decreased over time, indicating loss of species across sites and regions. In annually sampled grasslands, biomass, abundance and number of species declined by 67%, 78% and 34%, respectively. The decline was consistent across trophic levels and mainly affected rare species; its magnitude was independent of local land-use intensity. However, sites embedded in landscapes with a higher cover of agricultural land showed a stronger temporal decline. In 30 forest sites with annual inventories, biomass and species number-but not abundance-decreased by 41% and 36%, respectively. This was supported by analyses of all forest sites sampled in three-year intervals. The decline affected rare and abundant species, and trends differed across trophic levels. Our results show that there are widespread declines in arthropod biomass, abundance and the number of species across trophic levels. Arthropod declines in forests demonstrate that loss is not restricted to open habitats. Our results suggest that major drivers of arthropod decline act at larger spatial scales, and are (at least for grasslands) associated with agriculture at the landscape level. This implies that policies need to address the landscape scale to mitigate the negative effects of land-use practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31666721     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  82 in total

1.  Arthropods are not declining but are responsive to disturbance in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Timothy D Schowalter; Manoj Pandey; Steven J Presley; Michael R Willig; Jess K Zimmerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nonlinear trends in abundance and diversity and complex responses to climate change in Arctic arthropods.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Sarah Loboda; Amanda M Koltz; Mark A K Gillespie; Joseph J Bowden; Niels M Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Johanna Ärje; Kim Bjerge; Oskar L P Hansen; Alexandros Iosifidis; Florian Leese; Hjalte M R Mann; Kristian Meissner; Claus Melvad; Jenni Raitoharju
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Richard Fox; Danielle M Salcido; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Eliza M Grames; Matthew L Forister; May R Berenbaum; David Stopak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions.

Authors:  Martin S Warren; Dirk Maes; Chris A M van Swaay; Philippe Goffart; Hans Van Dyck; Nigel A D Bourn; Irma Wynhoff; Dan Hoare; Sam Ellis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Opinion: Eight simple actions that individuals can take to save insects from global declines.

Authors:  Akito Y Kawahara; Lawrence E Reeves; Jesse R Barber; Scott H Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil: the Big Outbreak Monitored by Light Traps.

Authors:  Alexandre Specht; Daniel Ricardo Sosa-Gómez; Danielly Albuquerque Medeiros Rios; Vander Célio Matos Claudino; Silvana Vieira Paula-Moraes; Juaci Vitória Malaquias; Fernando Antônio Macena Silva; Vânia Ferreira Roque-Specht
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.434

9.  Climate and land-use changes drive biodiversity turnover in arthropod assemblages over 150 years.

Authors:  Silvio Marta; Michele Brunetti; Raoul Manenti; Antonello Provenzale; Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Nutrient dilution and climate cycles underlie declines in a dominant insect herbivore.

Authors:  Ellen A R Welti; Karl A Roeder; Kirsten M de Beurs; Anthony Joern; Michael Kaspari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.