Literature DB >> 16399414

Bladder cancer: epidemiology, staging and grading, and diagnosis.

Ziya Kirkali1, Theresa Chan, Murugesan Manoharan, Ferran Algaba, Christer Busch, Liang Cheng, Lambertus Kiemeney, Martin Kriegmair, R Montironi, William M Murphy, Isabell A Sesterhenn, Masaaki Tachibana, Jeff Weider.   

Abstract

Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a variable natural history. At one end of the spectrum, low-grade Ta tumors have a low progression rate and require initial endoscopic treatment and surveillance but rarely present a threat to the patient. At the other extreme, high-grade tumors have a high malignant potential associated with significant progression and cancer death rates. In the Western world, bladder cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in men and the eighth most common in women. In Europe and the United States, bladder cancer accounts for 5% to 10% of all malignancies in men. The risk of developing bladder cancer at <75 years of age is 2% to 4% for men and 0.5% to 1% in women compared with the risk of lung cancer, for example, which is 8% in men and 2% in women. For the geographic and temporal comparison of bladder cancer incidence, it is crucial to separate the low-grade from the high-grade tumors. In epidemiologic studies on risk factors for bladder cancer, it is important to distinguish the low-grade Ta tumors from high-grade carcinoma in situ (CIS) and tumors >T1. Current studies do not support the routine screening for bladder cancer. However, prospective long-term studies are required to evaluate the benefits of bladder cancer screening, particularly in those at high risk. After assessing all available evidence, the Epidemiology and Diagnosis Committee has made recommendations on various diagnostic issues, including pathologic evaluation, urinary cytology, and imaging studies. Optimal resection techniques, role of repeat transurethral resection in high-grade T1 tumors, random bladder biopsy, and prostatic urethral biopsy are discussed, and appropriate recommendations are made according to the strength of available evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16399414     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  259 in total

1.  [Infectious diseases and injuries of bladder and urinary tract].

Authors:  J Budjan; P Riffel; M M Ong; C Bolenz; S O Schönberg; S Haneder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Surgical oncology. Alternatives to surgery after failure of instillation therapy.

Authors:  Christian Weiss; Claus Rödel
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Canadian guidelines for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a focus on intravesical therapy.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Ashish M Kamat; Alexander Zlotta; Bernard H Bochner; Ronald Moore; Alan So; Jonathan Izawa; Ricardo A Rendon; Louis Lacombe; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: best practice and recent developments.

Authors:  Dominic H Tang; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

6.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Partitioning of time trends in prevalence and mortality of bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Igor Akushevich; Arseniy P Yashkin; Brant A Inman; Frank Sloan
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Expression of p53 family genes in urinary bladder cancer: correlation with disease aggressiveness and recurrence.

Authors:  Danae Papadogianni; Nikolaos Soulitzis; Demetrios Delakas; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-11

9.  The Controlling Nutritional Status CONUT Score in Patients With Advanced Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Nemoto; Tsunenori Kondo; Hiroki Ishihara; Toshio Takagi; Hironori Fukuda; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Junpei Iizuka; Hideki Ishida; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  NMP22 is predictive of recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Lau; Joseph L Chin; Stephen Pautler; Hassan Razvi; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.