Literature DB >> 33622395

Association between gastric content fluidity and pars oesophageal ulcers in nursery pigs: a cross-sectional study of high-risk Danish herds using commercial feed.

Juan Miguel Peralvo-Vidal1, Nicolai Rosager Weber2, Jens Peter Nielsen1, Matthew Denwood3, Svend Haugegaard4, Anni Øyan Pedersen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the within-herd prevalence of pars oesophageal ulcers (POU) in high-risk Danish herds using commercial diets. Furthermore, we aimed to estimate the association between gastric content fluidity and POU using a generalised additive model (GAM). The study included 200 clinically healthy nursery pigs randomly selected from ten farms (20 pigs from each farm). The 10 farms were selected based on a suspected high prevalence of gastric ulcers. Post-mortem gastric ulcer assessment was based on macroscopic lesions, and gastric content fluidity was assessed based on the solid particle sedimentation percentage (solid phase).
RESULTS: We observed an overall prevalence of 35.5% for POU in nursery pigs. Within-herd prevalence varied considerably among farms, with values ranging from 0% in Farm 1 to 84% in Farm 4. Our model showed strong associations between POU and gastric content fluidity (P < 0.001), as well as between POU and farm of origin (P < 0.001). In addition, we observed that the risk of POU decreased non-linearly as the gastric content solid phase percentage increased, i.e. as the gastric content became more solid.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that pars oesophageal ulcers are present in Danish herds with nursery pigs fed commercial diets. Furthermore, we have established that gastric content fluidity is strongly associated with POU in nursery pigs. Even so, we cannot conclude that gastric content fluidity is solely responsible for POU. Future research should look into the association between pars oesophageal ulcers and both farm management activities and individual pig factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ad libitum feeding; Gastric content; Gastric ulcer; Nursery pig; Pars oesophagea; Risk factor; Solid phase

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622395      PMCID: PMC7901203          DOI: 10.1186/s40813-021-00199-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Porcine Health Manag        ISSN: 2055-5660


  18 in total

1.  Changes in pars esophageal tissue appearance of the porcine stomach in response to transportation, feed deprivation, and diet composition.

Authors:  B V Lawrence; D B Anderson; O Adeola; T R Cline
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  A note on the frequency of gastric ulcers detected during post-mortem examination at a pig abattoir.

Authors:  H Swaby; N G Gregory
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Use of tritiated water to assess, in vivo, the effect of dietary particle size on the mixing of stomach contents of swine.

Authors:  C V Maxwell; E M Reimann; W G Hoekstra; T Kowalczyk; N J Benevenga; R H Grummer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Inheritance of gastric ulcers in swine.

Authors:  J M Berruecos; O W Robison
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Mechanisms of acid injury in porcine gastroesophageal mucosa.

Authors:  R A Argenzio; J Eisemann
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Synergistic effect of hydrochloric acid and bile acids on the pars esophageal mucosa of the porcine stomach.

Authors:  J Lang; A Blikslager; D Regina; J Eisemann; R Argenzio
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Changes in gastric contents in pigs fed a finely ground and pelleted or coarsely ground meal diet.

Authors:  D C Regina; J H Eisemann; J A Lang; R A Argenzio
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Comparative pathophysiology of nonglandular ulcer disease: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  R A Argenzio
Journal:  Equine Vet J Suppl       Date:  1999-04

9.  Risk factors for gastric ulcers in Australian pigs at slaughter.

Authors:  I D Robertson; J M Accioly; K M Moore; S J Driesen; D W Pethick; D J Hampson
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Gastric ulcers in swine. 1. Effect of dietary protein, dietary fat and vitamin E on ulcer development.

Authors:  I Nafstad
Journal:  Pathol Vet       Date:  1967
View more
  1 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.