Literature DB >> 33621265

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) productivity influenced by microbial inocula under nitrogen-limited conditions in aquaponics.

Jessica A Day1, Christian Diener1, Anne E Otwell1, Kourtney E Tams2, Brad Bebout3, Angela M Detweiler3,4, Michael D Lee3,5, Madeline T Scott6, Wilson Ta6, Monica Ha6, Shienna A Carreon6, Kenny Tong6, Abdirizak A Ali6, Sean M Gibbons1,7,8, Nitin S Baliga1,9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

The demand for food will outpace productivity of conventional agriculture due to projected growth of the human population, concomitant with shrinkage of arable land, increasing scarcity of freshwater, and a rapidly changing climate. While aquaponics has potential to sustainably supplement food production with minimal environmental impact, there is a need to better characterize the complex interplay between the various components (fish, plant, microbiome) of these systems to optimize scale up and productivity. Here, we investigated how the commonly-implemented practice of continued microbial community transfer from pre-existing systems might promote or impede productivity of aquaponics. Specifically, we monitored plant growth phenotypes, water chemistry, and microbiome composition of rhizospheres, biofilters, and fish feces over 61-days of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. crispa) growth in nitrogen-limited aquaponic systems inoculated with bacteria that were either commercially sourced or originating from a pre-existing aquaponic system. Lettuce above- and below-ground growth were significantly reduced across replicates treated with a pre-existing aquaponic system inoculum when compared to replicates treated with a commercial inoculum. Reduced productivity was associated with enrichment in specific bacterial genera in plant roots, including Pseudomonas, following inoculum transfer from pre-existing systems. Increased productivity was associated with enrichment of nitrogen-fixing Rahnella in roots of plants treated with the commercial inoculum. Thus, we show that inoculation from a pre-existing system, rather than from a commercial inoculum, is associated with lower yields. Further work will be necessary to test the putative mechanisms involved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33621265      PMCID: PMC7901782          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  23 in total

Review 1.  Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere.

Authors:  Laurent Philippot; Jos M Raaijmakers; Philippe Lemanceau; Wim H van der Putten
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Microbial diversity in different compartments of an aquaponics system.

Authors:  Zala Schmautz; Andreas Graber; Sebastian Jaenicke; Alexander Goesmann; Ranka Junge; Theo H M Smits
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 3.  Rapid emergence of pathogens in agro-ecosystems: global threats to agricultural sustainability and food security.

Authors:  Bruce A McDonald; Eva H Stukenbrock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Who's who in the plant root microbiome?

Authors:  Penny R Hirsch; Tim H Mauchline
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations.

Authors:  Teresa Dias; Angela Dukes; Pedro M Antunes
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  Microbial Community Dynamics and Response to Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms in the Rhizosphere of Four Common Food Crops Cultivated in Hydroponics.

Authors:  C Sheridan; P Depuydt; M De Ro; C Petit; E Van Gysegem; P Delaere; M Dixon; M Stasiak; S B Aciksöz; E Frossard; R Paradiso; S De Pascale; V Ventorino; T De Meyer; B Sas; D Geelen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  yacrd and fpa: upstream tools for long-read genome assembly.

Authors:  Pierre Marijon; Rayan Chikhi; Jean-Stéphane Varré
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Diversity of Aquatic Pseudomonas Species and Their Activity against the Fish Pathogenic Oomycete Saprolegnia.

Authors:  Yiying Liu; Elzbieta Rzeszutek; Menno van der Voort; Cheng-Hsuan Wu; Even Thoen; Ida Skaar; Vincent Bulone; Pieter C Dorrestein; Jos M Raaijmakers; Irene de Bruijn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.

Authors:  Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.