Literature DB >> 33621252

Impact of surgeons' experience and the single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcome in stapedotomy.

Faris F Brkic1, Boban M Erovic2, Arina Onoprienko1, Stefan Janik1, Dominik Riss1, Claudia Lill2, Stefan Grasl1, Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi1,2, Erich Vyskocil1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgeons´ experience and perioperative single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis affect outcome of patients undergoing stapes surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated audiological outcomes and postoperative complications of 538 consecutive patients who underwent stapes surgery at a single tertiary referral center between 1990 and 2017. Effects of different clinical variables, including single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis and surgeons' experience on outcome were assessed.
RESULTS: 538 patients underwent 667 stapedotomies and postoperative complication rate was 7.5% (n = 50). Air conduction and air-bone gap closure improved significantly after surgery (14.2 ± 14.8 dB, p = 0.001; 14.5 ± 12.8 dB, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that 6 years or less of surgical experience was independently associated with a higher incidence of persisting or recurrent conductive hearing loss (p = 0.033, OR 5.13) but perioperative application of antibiotics had no significant effect on outcome.
CONCLUSION: First, clinical outcome regarding persisting or recurrent conductive hearing loss caused by incus necrosis and prosthesis luxation is linked to surgical performance. This underlines the need for a meticulous training and supervision of less experienced surgeons performing stapes surgery. Second, our results do not support the need for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in stapes surgery. Potential standard limitations of retrospective cohort studies (selection bias, confusion bias etc.) could play a role in interpreting our results. However, the probability for these limitations is minimized due to the large patient sample.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33621252      PMCID: PMC7901730          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  26 in total

1.  A new crimping device for stapedectomy prostheses.

Authors:  Karl-Bernd Huettenbrink; Dirk Beutner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Ettore Di Trapani; Giorgio Gandaglia; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Paolo Umari; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Alexander Mottrie; Franco Gaboardi; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Nazareno Suardi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The stability of short-term hearing outcome after stapedotomy: a prospective database study.

Authors:  Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Malin Charlotta Öhman; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Comparison of hearing results following the use of NiTiBOND versus Nitinol prostheses in stapes surgery: a retrospective controlled study reporting short-term postoperative results.

Authors:  Péter Révész; István Szanyi; Gábor Ráth; Tímea Bocskai; László Lujber; Zalán Piski; Tamás Karosi; Imre Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The learning curve revisited: stapedotomy.

Authors:  Eric W Sargent
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Protecting the cochlea during stapes surgery: is there a role for corticosteroids?

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Qing Ye; Jochen Tillein; O Adunka; Wolfgang Arnold; Wolfgang Gstöttner
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

7.  Adverse events associated with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for outpatient circumcisions at US children's hospitals.

Authors:  Katherine H Chan; Benjamin M Whittam; Elizabeth A S Moser; Mark P Cain; William E Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.

Authors:  Robert Vincent; Neil M Sperling; John Oates; Mudit Jindal
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation.

Authors:  Christoph Brase; Isabell Keil; Judith Schwitulla; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Matthias Schmid; Heinrich Iro; Joachim Hornung
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  A Nomogram to Predict the Outcome of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Head and Neck Masses.

Authors:  Ulana Kotowski; Faris F Brkic; Oskar Koperek; Eleonore Pablik; Stefan Grasl; Matthaeus Ch Grasl; Boban M Erovic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.