Literature DB >> 28732186

Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons.

Nicola Fossati1,2,3, Ettore Di Trapani1, Giorgio Gandaglia1, Paolo Dell'Oglio1, Paolo Umari2,3, Nicolò Maria Buffi4, Giorgio Guazzoni4, Alexander Mottrie2,3, Franco Gaboardi1, Francesco Montorsi1, Alberto Briganti1, Nazareno Suardi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the impact of surgeon experience on urinary continence (UC) recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 1477 consecutive patients treated with RARP by four surgeons between 2006 and 2014. UC recovery was defined as being completely dry over a 24-hour period at follow-up. Surgeon experience was coded as the total number of RARP performed by the surgeon before the patient's operation. Multivariable analysis tested the association between surgeon experience and UC recovery. Covariates consisted of patient age, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF), nerve-sparing surgery (none vs unilateral vs bilateral), and preoperative risk groups (low- vs intermediate- vs high risk).
RESULTS: The number of cases performed by each surgeon was 541, 413, 411, and 112, respectively. Median follow-up was 24 months (inter-quartile range: 18, 40). The UC recovery rate at 1 year after surgery was 82%. At multivariable analyses, surgeon experience represented an independent predictor of UC recovery (hazard ratio: 1.02, p < 0.001). The surgical learning curve was similar among surgeons, moving linearly from ∼60% of UC rate at the initial cases to almost 90% after more than 400 procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing RARP, surgeon experience is a significant predictor of UC recovery. The surgical learning curve of UC recovery does not reach a plateau even after more than 100 cases, suggesting a continuous improvement of the surgical technique. These findings deserve attention for patient counseling and future comparative studies evaluating functional outcomes after RARP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; robotic; surgical procedures; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28732186     DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Nina Natascha Harke; Christian Wagner; Nikolaos Liakos; Katarina Urbanova; Mustapha Addali; Boris A Hadaschik; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Analysis of the Learning Curve of Surgeons without Previous Experience in Laparoscopy to Perform Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Felipe Monnerat Lott; Deborah Siqueira; Hermano Argolo; Bernardo Lindberg Nóbrega; Franz Santos Campos; Luciano Alves Favorito
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2018-10-29

Review 4.  Preservation of continence in radical prostatectomy patients: a laparoscopic surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Piotr Kania; Piotr Wośkowiak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-01-17

Review 5.  Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Najib Isse Dirie; Gaurab Pokhrel; Wei Guan; Mukhtar Adan Mumin; Jun Yang; Jackson Ferdinand Masau; Henglong Hu; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 6.  Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  N A Soomro; D A Hashimoto; A J Porteous; C J A Ridley; W J Marsh; R Ditto; S Roy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-29

7.  Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve-sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE).

Authors:  Margaretha A van der Slot; Michael A den Bakker; Sjoerd Klaver; Mike Kliffen; Martijn B Busstra; John B W Rietbergen; Melanie Gan; Karen E Hamoen; Leo M Budel; Natascha N T Goemaere; Chris H Bangma; Jozien Helleman; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Cost-utility analysis on robot-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy based on long-term functional outcomes.

Authors:  Melanie A Lindenberg; Valesca P Retèl; Henk G van der Poel; Ferdau Bandstra; Carl Wijburg; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Factors affecting urinary incontinence during robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Hajiha; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03

10.  Impact of surgeons' experience and the single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcome in stapedotomy.

Authors:  Faris F Brkic; Boban M Erovic; Arina Onoprienko; Stefan Janik; Dominik Riss; Claudia Lill; Stefan Grasl; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi; Erich Vyskocil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.