Zheng Li1, Zhenxun Wang1,2, Mei Chin Lee2, Matthias Zenkel3, Esther Peh4, Mineo Ozaki5, Fotis Topouzis6,7, Satoko Nakano8, Anita Chan2,9, Shuwen Chen4, Susan E I Williams10, Andrew Orr11,12, Masakazu Nakano13, Nino Kobakhidze14, Tomasz Zarnowski15, Alina Popa-Cherecheanu16,17, Takanori Mizoguchi18, Shin-Ichi Manabe19, Ken Hayashi19, Shigeyasu Kazama20, Kenji Inoue21, Yosai Mori22, Kazunori Miyata22, Kazuhisa Sugiyama23, Tomomi Higashide23, Etsuo Chihara24, Ryuichi Ideta25, Satoshi Ishiko26, Akitoshi Yoshida27, Kana Tokumo28, Yoshiaki Kiuchi28, Tsutomu Ohashi29, Toshiya Sakurai30, Takako Sugimoto31, Hideki Chuman31, Makoto Aihara32, Masaru Inatani33, Kazuhiko Mori34, Yoko Ikeda34, Morio Ueno34, Daniel Gaston12, Paul Rafuse11, Lesya Shuba11, Joseph Saunders11, Marcelo Nicolela11, George Chichua14, Sergo Tabagari35, Panayiota Founti6,36, Kar Seng Sim1, Wee Yang Meah1, Hui Meng Soo1, Xiao Yin Chen1, Anthi Chatzikyriakidou37, Christina Keskini6, Theofanis Pappas6, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos6, Alexandros Lambropoulos37, Evangelia S Panagiotou6, Dimitrios G Mikropoulos6, Ewa Kosior-Jarecka15, Augustine Cheong1, Yuanhan Li2, Urszula Lukasik15, Monisha E Nongpiur2,9, Rahat Husain2, Shamira A Perera2, Lydia Álvarez38,39, Montserrat García38,39, Héctor González-Iglesias38,39, Andrés Fernández-Vega Cueto38,39, Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto38,39, Federico Martinón-Torres40, Antonio Salas41, Çilingir Oguz42, Nevbahar Tamcelik43, Eray Atalay44, Bilge Batu43, Murat Irkec45, Dilek Aktas46, Burcu Kasim45, Yury S Astakhov47, Sergei Y Astakhov47, Eugeny L Akopov47, Andreas Giessl3, Christian Mardin3, Claus Hellerbrand48, Jessica N Cooke Bailey49, Robert P Igo49, Jonathan L Haines49, Deepak P Edward50,51, Steffen Heegaard52,53, Sonia Davila54,55, Patrick Tan1,54,56,57, Jae H Kang58, Louis R Pasquale59, Friedrich E Kruse3, André Reis60, Trevor R Carmichael10, Michael Hauser61,62, Michele Ramsay63, Georg Mossböck64, Nilgun Yildirim44, Kei Tashiro13, Anastasios G P Konstas65, Miguel Coca-Prados38,39,66, Jia Nee Foo1,67, Shigeru Kinoshita68, Chie Sotozono34, Toshiaki Kubota8, Michael Dubina69, Robert Ritch70, Janey L Wiggs71, Francesca Pasutto60, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt3, Ying Swan Ho4, Tin Aung2,9,72, Wai Leong Tam1,57,73,74, Chiea Chuen Khor1,2,9. 1. Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. 2. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Bioprocessing Technology Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. 5. Ozaki Eye Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan. 6. First Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece. 7. iScreen Research Team, Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 8. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan. 9. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 10. Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Neurosciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 11. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 12. Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 13. Department of Genomic Medical Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 14. Chichua Medical Center Mzera, Tbilisi, Georgia. 15. Department of Diagnostics and Microsurgery of Glaucoma, Medical University, Lublin, Poland. 16. Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. 17. Department of Ophthalmology, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. 18. Mizoguchi Eye Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan. 19. Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. 20. Shinjo Eye Clinic, Miyazaki, Japan. 21. Inouye Eye Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 22. Miyata Eye Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan. 23. Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan. 24. Sensho-kai Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan. 25. Ideta Heisei Retina Consultants, Kumamoto, Japan. 26. Department of Medicine and Engineering Combined Research Institute, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan. 27. Department of Ophthalmology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan. 28. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 29. Ohashi Eye Center, Sapporo, Japan. 30. Tane Memorial Eye Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 31. Department of Ophthalmology, Miyazaki Medical College Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan. 32. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 33. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan. 34. Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 35. David Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia. 36. Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England. 37. Laboratory of Medical Biology-Genetics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece. 38. Fernández-Vega University Institute and Foundation of Ophthalmological Research, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 39. Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. 40. Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago and GENVIP Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 41. Unidade de Xenética, Instituto de Ciencias Forenses, Facultade de Medicina, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, and GenPoB Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Galicia, Spain. 42. Department of Genetics, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey. 43. Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. 44. Department of Ophthalmology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey. 45. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. 46. DAMAGEN Genetic Diagnostic Center, Ankara, Turkey. 47. Department of Ophthalmology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia. 48. Institute of Biochemistry, Emil-Fischer-Zentrum, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 49. Institute for Computational Biology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 50. King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 51. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago. 52. Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 53. Eye Pathology Section, Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 54. SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore. 55. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 56. Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 57. Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 58. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 59. Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 60. Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 61. Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 62. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 63. Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 64. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria. 65. First and Third Departments of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece. 66. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 67. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. 68. Department of Frontier Medical Science and Technology for Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 69. State Research Institute of Highly Pure Biopreparations FMBA Russia, St Petersburg, Russia. 70. Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 71. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 72. Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 73. Nanyang Technological University School of Biological Sciences, Singapore. 74. Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Importance: Exfoliation syndrome is a systemic disorder characterized by progressive accumulation of abnormal fibrillar protein aggregates manifesting clinically in the anterior chamber of the eye. This disorder is the most commonly known cause of glaucoma and a major cause of irreversible blindness. Objective: To determine if exfoliation syndrome is associated with rare, protein-changing variants predicted to impair protein function. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 2-stage, case-control, whole-exome sequencing association study with a discovery cohort and 2 independently ascertained validation cohorts. Study participants from 14 countries were enrolled between February 1999 and December 2019. The date of last clinical follow-up was December 2019. Affected individuals had exfoliation material on anterior segment structures of at least 1 eye as visualized by slit lamp examination. Unaffected individuals had no signs of exfoliation syndrome. Exposures: Rare, coding-sequence genetic variants predicted to be damaging by bioinformatic algorithms trained to recognize alterations that impair protein function. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the presence of exfoliation syndrome. Exome-wide significance for detected variants was defined as P < 2.5 × 10-6. The secondary outcomes included biochemical enzymatic assays and gene expression analyses. Results: The discovery cohort included 4028 participants with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 78 years [interquartile range, 73-83 years]; 2377 [59.0%] women) and 5638 participants without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 72 years [interquartile range, 65-78 years]; 3159 [56.0%] women). In the discovery cohort, persons with exfoliation syndrome, compared with those without exfoliation syndrome, were significantly more likely to carry damaging CYP39A1 variants (1.3% vs 0.30%, respectively; odds ratio, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.07-6.10]; P = 6.1 × 10-7). This outcome was validated in 2 independent cohorts. The first validation cohort included 2337 individuals with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 74 years; 1132 women; n = 1934 with demographic data) and 2813 individuals without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 72 years; 1287 women; n = 2421 with demographic data). The second validation cohort included 1663 individuals with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 75 years; 587 women; n = 1064 with demographic data) and 3962 individuals without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 74 years; 951 women; n = 1555 with demographic data). Of the individuals from both validation cohorts, 5.2% with exfoliation syndrome carried CYP39A1 damaging alleles vs 3.1% without exfoliation syndrome (odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.47-2.26]; P < .001). Biochemical assays classified 34 of 42 damaging CYP39A1 alleles as functionally deficient (median reduction in enzymatic activity compared with wild-type CYP39A1, 94.4% [interquartile range, 78.7%-98.2%] for the 34 deficient variants). CYP39A1 transcript expression was 47% lower (95% CI, 30%-64% lower; P < .001) in ciliary body tissues from individuals with exfoliation syndrome compared with individuals without exfoliation syndrome. Conclusions and Relevance: In this whole-exome sequencing case-control study, presence of exfoliation syndrome was significantly associated with carriage of functionally deficient CYP39A1 sequence variants. Further research is needed to understand the clinical implications of these findings.
Importance: Exfoliation syndrome is a systemic disorder characterized by progressive accumulation of abnormal fibrillar protein aggregates manifesting clinically in the anterior chamber of the eye. This disorder is the most commonly known cause of glaucoma and a major cause of irreversible blindness. Objective: To determine if exfoliation syndrome is associated with rare, protein-changing variants predicted to impair protein function. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 2-stage, case-control, whole-exome sequencing association study with a discovery cohort and 2 independently ascertained validation cohorts. Study participants from 14 countries were enrolled between February 1999 and December 2019. The date of last clinical follow-up was December 2019. Affected individuals had exfoliation material on anterior segment structures of at least 1 eye as visualized by slit lamp examination. Unaffected individuals had no signs of exfoliation syndrome. Exposures: Rare, coding-sequence genetic variants predicted to be damaging by bioinformatic algorithms trained to recognize alterations that impair protein function. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the presence of exfoliation syndrome. Exome-wide significance for detected variants was defined as P < 2.5 × 10-6. The secondary outcomes included biochemical enzymatic assays and gene expression analyses. Results: The discovery cohort included 4028 participants with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 78 years [interquartile range, 73-83 years]; 2377 [59.0%] women) and 5638 participants without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 72 years [interquartile range, 65-78 years]; 3159 [56.0%] women). In the discovery cohort, persons with exfoliation syndrome, compared with those without exfoliation syndrome, were significantly more likely to carry damaging CYP39A1 variants (1.3% vs 0.30%, respectively; odds ratio, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.07-6.10]; P = 6.1 × 10-7). This outcome was validated in 2 independent cohorts. The first validation cohort included 2337 individuals with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 74 years; 1132 women; n = 1934 with demographic data) and 2813 individuals without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 72 years; 1287 women; n = 2421 with demographic data). The second validation cohort included 1663 individuals with exfoliation syndrome (median age, 75 years; 587 women; n = 1064 with demographic data) and 3962 individuals without exfoliation syndrome (median age, 74 years; 951 women; n = 1555 with demographic data). Of the individuals from both validation cohorts, 5.2% with exfoliation syndrome carried CYP39A1 damaging alleles vs 3.1% without exfoliation syndrome (odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.47-2.26]; P < .001). Biochemical assays classified 34 of 42 damaging CYP39A1 alleles as functionally deficient (median reduction in enzymatic activity compared with wild-type CYP39A1, 94.4% [interquartile range, 78.7%-98.2%] for the 34 deficient variants). CYP39A1 transcript expression was 47% lower (95% CI, 30%-64% lower; P < .001) in ciliary body tissues from individuals with exfoliation syndrome compared with individuals without exfoliation syndrome. Conclusions and Relevance: In this whole-exome sequencing case-control study, presence of exfoliation syndrome was significantly associated with carriage of functionally deficient CYP39A1 sequence variants. Further research is needed to understand the clinical implications of these findings.
Authors: Min-Yu Sun; Andrew J Linsenbardt; Christine M Emnett; Lawrence N Eisenman; Yukitoshi Izumi; Charles F Zorumski; Steve Mennerick Journal: Neuroscientist Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 7.519
Authors: Shiwani Sharma; Tim Chataway; Kathryn P Burdon; Lisa Jonavicius; Sonja Klebe; Alex W Hewitt; Richard A Mills; Jamie E Craig Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Gundula Povysil; Slavé Petrovski; Joseph Hostyk; Vimla Aggarwal; Andrew S Allen; David B Goldstein Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Seung Hoan Choi; Lu-Chen Weng; Carolina Roselli; Honghuang Lin; Christopher M Haggerty; M Benjamin Shoemaker; John Barnard; Dan E Arking; Daniel I Chasman; Christine M Albert; Mark Chaffin; Nathan R Tucker; Jonathan D Smith; Namrata Gupta; Stacey Gabriel; Lauren Margolin; Marisa A Shea; Christian M Shaffer; Zachary T Yoneda; Eric Boerwinkle; Nicholas L Smith; Edwin K Silverman; Susan Redline; Ramachandran S Vasan; Esteban G Burchard; Stephanie M Gogarten; Cecelia Laurie; Thomas W Blackwell; Gonçalo Abecasis; David J Carey; Brandon K Fornwalt; Diane T Smelser; Aris Baras; Frederick E Dewey; Cashell E Jaquish; George J Papanicolaou; Nona Sotoodehnia; David R Van Wagoner; Bruce M Psaty; Sekar Kathiresan; Dawood Darbar; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; Mina K Chung; Dan M Roden; Emelia J Benjamin; Michael F Murray; Kathryn L Lunetta; Steven A Lubitz; Patrick T Ellinor Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Niklas Krumm; Tychele N Turner; Carl Baker; Laura Vives; Kiana Mohajeri; Kali Witherspoon; Archana Raja; Bradley P Coe; Holly A Stessman; Zong-Xiao He; Suzanne M Leal; Raphael Bernier; Evan E Eichler Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Ron Do; Nathan O Stitziel; Hong-Hee Won; Anders Berg Jørgensen; Stefano Duga; Pier Angelica Merlini; Adam Kiezun; Martin Farrall; Anuj Goel; Or Zuk; Illaria Guella; Rosanna Asselta; Leslie A Lange; Gina M Peloso; Paul L Auer; Domenico Girelli; Nicola Martinelli; Deborah N Farlow; Mark A DePristo; Robert Roberts; Alexander F R Stewart; Danish Saleheen; John Danesh; Stephen E Epstein; Suthesh Sivapalaratnam; G Kees Hovingh; John J Kastelein; Nilesh J Samani; Heribert Schunkert; Jeanette Erdmann; Svati H Shah; William E Kraus; Robert Davies; Majid Nikpay; Christopher T Johansen; Jian Wang; Robert A Hegele; Eliana Hechter; Winfried Marz; Marcus E Kleber; Jie Huang; Andrew D Johnson; Mingyao Li; Greg L Burke; Myron Gross; Yongmei Liu; Themistocles L Assimes; Gerardo Heiss; Ethan M Lange; Aaron R Folsom; Herman A Taylor; Oliviero Olivieri; Anders Hamsten; Robert Clarke; Dermot F Reilly; Wu Yin; Manuel A Rivas; Peter Donnelly; Jacques E Rossouw; Bruce M Psaty; David M Herrington; James G Wilson; Stephen S Rich; Michael J Bamshad; Russell P Tracy; L Adrienne Cupples; Daniel J Rader; Muredach P Reilly; John A Spertus; Sharon Cresci; Jaana Hartiala; W H Wilson Tang; Stanley L Hazen; Hooman Allayee; Alex P Reiner; Christopher S Carlson; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Eric Boerwinkle; Eric S Lander; Stephen M Schwartz; David S Siscovick; Ruth McPherson; Anne Tybjaerg-Hansen; Goncalo R Abecasis; Hugh Watkins; Deborah A Nickerson; Diego Ardissino; Shamil R Sunyaev; Christopher J O'Donnell; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Sekar Kathiresan Journal: Nature Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jeff J Huang; Jack E Geduldig; Erica B Jacobs; Tak Yee T Tai; Sumayya Ahmad; Nisha Chadha; Douglas F Buxton; Kateki Vinod; Barbara M Wirostko; Jae H Kang; Janey L Wiggs; Robert Ritch; Louis R Pasquale Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2022-04-22
Authors: Sean Mullany; Henry Marshall; Tiger Zhou; Daniel Thomson; Joshua M Schmidt; Ayub Qassim; Lachlan S W Knight; Georgina Hollitt; Ella C Berry; Thi Nguyen; Minh-Son To; David Dimasi; Abraham Kuot; Joshua Dubowsky; Rhys Fogarty; Michelle Sun; Luke Chehade; Shilpa Kuruvilla; Devaraj Supramaniam; James Breen; Shiwani Sharma; John Landers; Stewart Lake; Richard A Mills; Mark M Hassall; Weng O Chan; Sonja Klebe; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Owen M Siggs; Jamie E Craig Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.799