| Literature DB >> 33620158 |
Peng-Fei Huang1, Qi Mou1, Ying Yang1, Jia-Ming Li1, Ming-Lang Xu1, Jing Huang1, Jian-Zhong Li1, Huan-Sheng Yang1, Xiao-Xiao Liang2, Yu-Long Yin1,2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of adding Pennisetum purpureum (P. purpureum, also known as Napier grass or elephant grass) to the diets of late gestation on the antioxidant indexes, immune indexes and faecal microbiota of sows. At the 90 days of gestation, 300 healthy sows were randomly divided into three groups, and they received the basic commercial diet or added 5% P. purpureum and 10% P. purpureum, respectively. The experiment started from 90 days of gestation to parturition. The results showed that the total antioxidant capacity, immunoglobulins and serum equol concentrations of sows on 100 days of gestation and at parturition increased linearly (p < .05) with the increase of the content of P. purpureum in the gestation diet. The 5% P. purpureum increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (p = .027) and Actinobacteria (p < .001) at phylum level, Coriobacteriaceae (p < .001) at family level and Prevotellaceae_UCG_001 (p = .004) at genus level, and decreased the relative abundance of Escherichia_Shigella (p < .001) at genus level. In summary, this study shows that the additive of P. purpureum can increase the concentration of serum equol, improve the antioxidant capacity and immune function of sow in late gestation. In addition, the additive of 5% P. purpureum in the diet might change the composition of intestinal microbiota of sows, particularly the relative abundance of Coriobacteriaceae (p < .001) increased.Entities:
Keywords: Napier grass; antioxidant capacity; fiber; gestation diet; immune function
Year: 2021 PMID: 33620158 PMCID: PMC8294372 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Sci ISSN: 2053-1095
Ingredient and nutrient composition of basal commercial and experimental gestation diets
| Items | C | 5% | 10% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredient (%) | |||
| Corn | 59.18 | 61.44 | 63.72 |
| Rice bran | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Wheat bran | 18.02 | 11.05 | 4.04 |
| Soybean meal | 6.83 | 6.71 | 6.61 |
|
| — | 5.00 | 10.00 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.28 |
| Zeolite powder | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Calcium carbonate | 1.43 | 1.24 | 1.02 |
| Salt | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Lysine hydrochloride | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Premix | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Calculated composition | |||
| GE (Mcal/kg) | 2.25 | 2.21 | 2.26 |
| SID Lys (%) | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.55 |
| SID Met (%) | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| SID Thr (%) | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| SID Trp (%) | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Ca (%) | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| STTD phosphorus (%) | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Analysed composition | |||
| CP (%) | 12.50 | 12.50 | 12.5 |
| EE (%) | 4.55 | 4.47 | 4.40 |
| NDF (%) | 15.96 | 16.46 | 16.93 |
| ADF (%) | 5.64 | 7.12 | 8.61 |
Abbreviations: CF, Crude fiber; CP, Crude protein; EE, ether extract; GE, gross energy;SID, standardized ileal digestible; STTD, standardized total tract digestible.
C = control diet group; 5% = 5% P. purpureum diet group; 10% = 10% P. purpureum diet group; NDF = neutral detergent fibre; ADF = acid detergent fiber.
P. purpureum contains 19.17% crude protein, 2.37% crude fat and 22.77% crude fiber, and GE = 1.66 Mcal/kg.
Provided per kilogram of diet: Cu, 10.0 mg; Fe 100 mg; Mn 30 mg; Zn 60 mg; I 0.6 mg; Se 0.3 mg; Vitamin A 7,500 IU; Vitamin D3 1,500 IU; Vitamin E 30 mg; Vitamin K 2 mg; 2 mg thiamin; 2 mg riboflavin; 2 mg pyridoxine; 0.02 mg cobalamin.
Calculated chemical concentrations using values for feed ingredients from National Research Council (NRC 2012).
FIGURE 1Experimental design
FIGURE 2Tags number, OTUs number and Venn diagrams. (a) Total tags are equivalent to clean tags. Taxon tags refer to the number of tags used to build OTUs. OTUs, operational taxonomic units. (b) CONG, the control group at gestation; PPG, the 5% Pennisetum purpureum group at gestation
Effect of inclusion of Pennisetum purpureum in gestation diet on ATTD of energy and nutrients of sows*
| Item | C1 | 5% | 10% |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 81.72a | 81.31a | 80.45b | 0.25 | .014 |
| DM | 82.23 | 81.79 | 81.72 | 0.31 | .191 |
| CP | 83.66 | 83.14 | 83.77 | 0.44 | .837 |
| EE | 56.61a | 55.05a | 50.99b | 1.56 | .004 |
| Ash | 36.33 | 36.93 | 33.74 | 1.96 | .152 |
| Ca | 41.26a | 41.01a | 40.75b | 0.17 | .001 |
| Total P | 35.77a | 34.20a | 37.62b | 1.52 | .018 |
Different letters in the same line indicate significant statistical differences (p < .05).
C = control diet group; 5% = 5% P. purpureum diet group; 10% = 10% P. purpureum diet group. Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are standard error of the mean (SEM).
Effect of Pennisetum purpureum additive in late gestation on serum immunoglobulin concentrations of sows*
| Item |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | Con versus | Linear | Quadratic | |
| 90 days, μg/ml | ||||||
| IgA | 65.34 ± 4.78 | 65.99 ± 6.63 | 70.34 ± 7.54 | .186 | .093 | .463 |
| IgG | 419.93 ± 31.62 | 414.43 ± 20.87 | 411.39 ± 20.39 | .740 | .449 | .899 |
| IgM | 80.79 ± 9.21 | 75.15 ± 5.46 | 76.59 ± 6.20 | .206 | .200 | .213 |
| 100 days, μg/ml | ||||||
| IgA | 101.18 ± 8.26 | 111.61 ± 12.90 | 112.95 ± 9.77 | .036 | .018 | .272 |
| IgG | 461.29 ± 25.59 | 478.30 ± 36.80 | 502.78 ± 22.41 | .012 | .003 | .741 |
| IgM | 146.79 ± 8.91 | 156.97 ± 8.75 | 161.69 ± 14.34 | .016 | .005 | .526 |
| At parturition, μg/ml | ||||||
| IgA | 136.10 ± 15.40 | 142.34 ± 13.33 | 149.38 ± 11.99 | .113 | .039 | .939 |
| IgG | 809.47 ± 30.89 | 803.28 ± 38.22 | 820.47 ± 41.33 | .583 | .513 | .423 |
| IgM | 175.99 ± 19.26 | 179.71 ± 8.53 | 188.47 ± 11.88 | .141 | .056 | .645 |
Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are means ± SE, n = 10 per treatment.
Effect of Pennisetum purpureum additive in late gestation on serum MDA concentrations of sows*
| Item |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | Con versus | Linear | Quadratic | |
| 90 days, nmol/ml | 2.75 ± 0.21 | 2.82 ± 0.23 | 2.60 ± 0.29 | .122 | .223 | .094 |
| 100 days, nmol/ml | 5.53 ± 0.67 | 2.60 ± 0.26 | 1.62 ± 0.17 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 |
| At parturition, nmol/ml | 7.48 ± 0.67 | 6.50 ± 0.55 | 4.23 ± 0.32 | <.001 | <.001 | .013 |
Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are means ± SE, n = 10 per treatment.
Effect of Pennisetum purpureum additive in late gestation on serum antioxidative indicators of sows*
| Item |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | Con versus | Linear | Quadratic | |
| 90 days, U/ml | ||||||
| T‐AOC | 10.52 ± 1.47 | 11.04 ± 1.39 | 10.79 ± 1.08 | .518 | .259 | .893 |
| T‐SOD | 41.67 ± 1.32 | 42.36 ± 2.09 | 40.12 ± 1.92 | .080 | .105 | .109 |
| CAT | 1.76 ± 0.19 | 1.58 ± 0.17 | 1.94 ± 0.33 | .248 | .174 | .329 |
| GSH‐Px | 850.6 ± 62.1 | 859.4 ± 30.4 | 862.5 ± 60.1 | .149 | .349 | .086 |
| 100 days, U/ml | ||||||
| T‐AOC | 12.58 ± 1.64 | 14.41 ± 2.19 | 15.66 ± 2.16 | .012 | .008 | .135 |
| T‐SOD | 65.26 ± 3.75 | 65.87 ± 2.72 | 69.22 ± 4.10 | .039 | .014 | .044 |
| CAT | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 2.46 ± 0.15 | 2.62 ± 0.43 | <.001 | <.001 | .302 |
| GSH‐Px | 970.5 ± 43.5 | 955.8 ± 60.2 | 991.6 ± 51.2 | .512 | .707 | .278 |
| At parturition, U/ml | ||||||
| T‐AOC | 8.25 ± 1.42 | 10.16 ± 1.61 | 11.12 ± 1.07 | <.001 | <.001 | .299 |
| T‐SOD | 68.41 ± 6.89 | 70.27 ± 6.52 | 72.14 ± 7.59 | <.001 | <.001 | .552 |
| CAT | 2.15 ± 0.23 | 2.55 ± 0.42 | 2.69 ± 0.37 | .001 | <.001 | .720 |
| GSH‐Px | 807.4 ± 48.9 | 799.3 ± 33.7 | 815.7 ± 45.2 | .088 | .029 | .957 |
Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are means ± SE, n = 10 per treatment.
Effect of Pennisetum purpureum additive in late gestation on serum equol of sows*
| Item |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | Con versus | Linear | Quadratic | |
| 90 days, U/ml | 86.27 ± 6.89 | 89.92 ± 6.11 | 83.56 ± 8.42 | .247 | .156 | .374 |
| 100 days, U/ml | 97.55 ± 5.41 | 327.51 ± 27.92 | 350.13 ± 29.42 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 |
| At parturition, U/ml | 90.22 ± 7.31 | 412.21 ± 36.14 | 444.12 ± 42.14 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 |
Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are means ± SE, n = 10 per treatment.
Effect of Pennisetum purpureum additive in gestation on SCFAs concentration in faeces of sows*
| Item |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | Con versus | Linear | Quadratic | |
| 90 days, μmol/g | ||||||
| Acetic acid | 48.39 ± 5.52 | 47.64 ± 6.12 | 49.25 ± 5.26 | .052 | .018 | .576 |
| Propionic acid | 20.65 ± 2.17 | 22.14 ± 2.58 | 20.18 ± 2.72 | .058 | .071 | .107 |
| Butyric acid | 10.87 ± 1.44 | 11.24 ± 1.35 | 10.52 ± 1.07 | .673 | .609 | .470 |
| 100 days, μmol/g | ||||||
| Acetic acid | 49.13 ± 4.31 | 48.45 ± 4.24 | 50.16 ± 5.04 | .423 | .889 | .196 |
| Propionic acid | 22.95 ± 2.56 | 23.14 ± 2.79 | 21.22 ± 2.76 | .338 | .158 | .700 |
| Butyric acid | 11.29 ± 1.45 | 14.37 ± 1.72 | 16.42 ± 1.88 | <.001 | <.001 | .301 |
| At parturition, μmol/g | ||||||
| Acetic acid | 46.41 ± 6.28 | 44.52 ± 5.29 | 45.24 ± 5.31 | .229 | .145 | .361 |
| Propionic acid | 20.42 ± 3.24 | 21.74 ± 2.98 | 21.85 ± 2.49 | .632 | .343 | .964 |
| Butyric acid | 11.80 ± 2.01 | 16.52 ± 2.35 | 18.64 ± 2.75 | <.001 | <.001 | .063 |
Values were considered statistically significant when p < .05 and as a trend to significance when .05 ≤ p < .10.
Values are means ± SE, n = 10 per treatment.
FIGURE 3Alpha diversity and beta diversity analyses of microbial community structure. (a) The observed species index analyses, p < .001; (b) principal component analysis; ANOSIM analyses show the difference of microbial community structure. R value is >0, indicating significant differences between groups. The reliability of statistical analysis is expressed by p value
FIGURE 4Relative abundances of faecal microbiota composition at the phylum level (a), family level (b), and the genus level (c). (a) The relative abundances of top seven phyla of faecal microbiota composition. (b) The relative abundances of eight family (%, >0.1% in at least one sample) with significant difference. (c) The relative abundances of 14 genera (%, >0.1% in at least one sample) with significant difference. Data were expressed as means ± SE, n = 10 for each treatment. CONG, the control group; PPG, the 5% Pennisetum purpureum group