Anisha Garg1, Alexandria L Soto2, Andrea K Knies3, Stanislav Kolenikov4, Marci Schalk5, Heather Hammer6, Douglas B White7, Robert G Holloway8, Kevin N Sheth2,9, Liana Fraenkel10,11, David Y Hwang12,13. 1. Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Abt Associates, Columbia, MO, USA. 5. Abt Associates, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Booz Allen Hamilton, Washington, DC, USA. 7. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 9. Center for Neuroepidemiology and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 10. Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA. 11. Section of Rheumatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 12. Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. david.hwang@yale.edu. 13. Center for Neuroepidemiology and Clinical Neurological Research, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. david.hwang@yale.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with a severe acute brain injury admitted to the intensive care unit often have a poor neurological prognosis. In these situations, a clinician is responsible for conducting a goals-of-care conversation with the patient's surrogate decision makers. The diversity in thought and background of surrogate decision makers can present challenges during these conversations. For this reason, our study aimed to identify predictive characteristics of US surrogate decision makers' favoring life-sustaining treatment (LST) over comfort measures only for patients with severe acute brain injury. METHODS: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey study that had recruited 1588 subjects from an online probability-based US population sample. Seven hundred and ninety-two subjects had randomly received a hypothetical scenario regarding a relative intubated with severe acute brain injury with a prognosis of severe disability but with the potential to regain some consciousness. Seven hundred and ninety-six subjects had been randomized to a similar scenario in which the relative was projected to remain vegetative. For each scenario, we conducted univariate analyses and binary logistic regressions to determine predictors of LST selection among available respondent characteristics. RESULTS: 15.0% of subjects selected LST for the severe disability scenario compared to 11.4% for the vegetative state scenario (p = 0.07), with those selecting LST in both groups expressing less decisional certainty. For the severe disability scenario, independent predictors of LST included having less than a high school education (adjusted OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.23-6.76), concern regarding prognostic accuracy (7.64, 3.61-16.15), and concern regarding the cost of care (4.07, 1.80-9.18). For the vegetative scenario, predictors included the youngest age group (30-44 years, 3.33, 1.02-10.86), male gender (3.26, 1.75-6.06), English as a second language (2.94, 1.09-7.89), Evangelical Protestant (3.72, 1.28-10.84) and Catholic (4.01, 1.72-9.36) affiliations, and low income (< $25 K). CONCLUSION: Several demographic and decisional characteristics of US surrogate decision makers predict LST selection for patients with severe brain injury with varying degrees of poor prognosis. Surrogates concerned about the cost of medical care may nevertheless be inclined to select LST, albeit with high levels of decisional uncertainty, for patients projected to have severe disabilities.
BACKGROUND: Patients with a severe acute brain injury admitted to the intensive care unit often have a poor neurological prognosis. In these situations, a clinician is responsible for conducting a goals-of-care conversation with the patient's surrogate decision makers. The diversity in thought and background of surrogate decision makers can present challenges during these conversations. For this reason, our study aimed to identify predictive characteristics of US surrogate decision makers' favoring life-sustaining treatment (LST) over comfort measures only for patients with severe acute brain injury. METHODS: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey study that had recruited 1588 subjects from an online probability-based US population sample. Seven hundred and ninety-two subjects had randomly received a hypothetical scenario regarding a relative intubated with severe acute brain injury with a prognosis of severe disability but with the potential to regain some consciousness. Seven hundred and ninety-six subjects had been randomized to a similar scenario in which the relative was projected to remain vegetative. For each scenario, we conducted univariate analyses and binary logistic regressions to determine predictors of LST selection among available respondent characteristics. RESULTS: 15.0% of subjects selected LST for the severe disability scenario compared to 11.4% for the vegetative state scenario (p = 0.07), with those selecting LST in both groups expressing less decisional certainty. For the severe disability scenario, independent predictors of LST included having less than a high school education (adjusted OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.23-6.76), concern regarding prognostic accuracy (7.64, 3.61-16.15), and concern regarding the cost of care (4.07, 1.80-9.18). For the vegetative scenario, predictors included the youngest age group (30-44 years, 3.33, 1.02-10.86), male gender (3.26, 1.75-6.06), English as a second language (2.94, 1.09-7.89), Evangelical Protestant (3.72, 1.28-10.84) and Catholic (4.01, 1.72-9.36) affiliations, and low income (< $25 K). CONCLUSION: Several demographic and decisional characteristics of US surrogate decision makers predict LST selection for patients with severe brain injury with varying degrees of poor prognosis. Surrogates concerned about the cost of medical care may nevertheless be inclined to select LST, albeit with high levels of decisional uncertainty, for patients projected to have severe disabilities.
Authors: Rebecca W Johnson; L Kristin Newby; Christopher B Granger; Wendy A Cook; Eric D Peterson; Melvin Echols; Wanda Bride; Bradi B Granger Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Cora H Ormseth; Guido J Falcone; Sara D Jasak; David M Mampre; Audrey C Leasure; Laura C Miyares; David Y Hwang; Michael L James; Fernando D Testai; Kyra J Becker; David L Tirschwell; Carl D Langefeld; Daniel Woo; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Lucas S Zier; Peter D Sottile; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa A Weissfield; Douglas B White Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Susan Gaeta; Aidin Ashoori; Kristen J Price; Joseph L Nates Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Thomas Quinn; Jesse Moskowitz; Muhammad W Khan; Lori Shutter; Robert Goldberg; Nananda Col; Kathleen M Mazor; Susanne Muehlschlegel Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Connie Ge; Adeline L Goss; Sybil Crawford; Kelsey Goostrey; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Anne-Marie Shields; Catherine L Hough; Bernard Lo; Shannon S Carson; Jay Steingrub; Douglas B White; Susanne Muehlschlegel Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-02-21