Literature DB >> 33619545

Four-pronged negative feedback of DSB machinery in meiotic DNA-break control in mice.

Ihsan Dereli1, Marcello Stanzione1, Fabrizio Olmeda2, Frantzeskos Papanikos1, Marek Baumann1, Sevgican Demir1, Fabrizia Carofiglio3, Julian Lange4,5, Bernard de Massy6, Willy M Baarends3, James Turner7, Steffen Rulands2,8, Attila Tóth1.   

Abstract

In most taxa, halving of chromosome numbers during meiosis requires that homologous chromosomes (homologues) pair and form crossovers. Crossovers emerge from the recombination-mediated repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs are generated by SPO11, whose activity requires auxiliary protein complexes, called pre-DSB recombinosomes. To elucidate the spatiotemporal control of the DSB machinery, we focused on an essential SPO11 auxiliary protein, IHO1, which serves as the main anchor for pre-DSB recombinosomes on chromosome cores, called axes. We discovered that DSBs restrict the DSB machinery by at least four distinct pathways in mice. Firstly, by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) kinase ATM, DSBs restrict pre-DSB recombinosome numbers without affecting IHO1. Secondly, in their vicinity, DSBs trigger IHO1 depletion mainly by another DDR kinase, ATR. Thirdly, DSBs enable homologue synapsis, which promotes the depletion of IHO1 and pre-DSB recombinosomes from synapsed axes. Finally, DSBs and three DDR kinases, ATM, ATR and PRKDC, enable stage-specific depletion of IHO1 from all axes. We hypothesize that these four negative feedback pathways protect genome integrity by ensuring that DSBs form without excess, are well-distributed, and are restricted to genomic locations and prophase stages where DSBs are functional for promoting homologue pairing and crossover formation.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619545      PMCID: PMC7969012          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  60 in total

1.  The expression profile of the major mouse SPO11 isoforms indicates that SPO11beta introduces double strand breaks and suggests that SPO11alpha has an additional role in prophase in both spermatocytes and oocytes.

Authors:  Marina A Bellani; Kingsley A Boateng; Dianne McLeod; R Daniel Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The TopoVIB-Like protein family is required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation.

Authors:  T Robert; A Nore; C Brun; C Maffre; B Crimi; H-M Bourbon; B de Massy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Control of meiotic double-strand-break formation by ATM: local and global views.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lukaszewicz; Julian Lange; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Differential gene expression of mammalian SPO11/TOP6A homologs during meiosis.

Authors:  M Shannon; L Richardson; A Christian; M A Handel; M P Thelen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Mouse TRIP13/PCH2 is required for recombination and normal higher-order chromosome structure during meiosis.

Authors:  Ignasi Roig; James A Dowdle; Attila Toth; Dirk G de Rooij; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Complementary functions of ATM and H2AX in development and suppression of genomic instability.

Authors:  Shan Zha; JoAnn Sekiguchi; James W Brush; Craig H Bassing; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia.

Authors:  C Barlow; S Hirotsune; R Paylor; M Liyanage; M Eckhaus; F Collins; Y Shiloh; J N Crawley; T Ried; D Tagle; A Wynshaw-Boris
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Numerical and spatial patterning of yeast meiotic DNA breaks by Tel1.

Authors:  Neeman Mohibullah; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  ATR is required to complete meiotic recombination in mice.

Authors:  Sarai Pacheco; Andros Maldonado-Linares; Marina Marcet-Ortega; Cristina Rojas; Ana Martínez-Marchal; Judit Fuentes-Lazaro; Julian Lange; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney; Oscar Fernández-Capetillo; Montserrat Garcia-Caldés; Ignasi Roig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Mouse pachytene checkpoint 2 (trip13) is required for completing meiotic recombination but not synapsis.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; Xin Li; John C Schimenti
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Phosphoregulation of DSB-1 mediates control of meiotic double-strand break activity.

Authors:  Heyun Guo; Ericca L Stamper; Aya Sato-Carlton; Masa A Shimazoe; Xuan Li; Liangyu Zhang; Lewis Stevens; K C Jacky Tam; Abby F Dernburg; Peter M Carlton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Chromosomal synapsis defects can trigger oocyte apoptosis without elevating numbers of persistent DNA breaks above wild-type levels.

Authors:  Ramya Ravindranathan; Kavya Raveendran; Frantzeskos Papanikos; Pedro A San-Segundo; Attila Tóth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 19.160

3.  Sycp1 Is Not Required for Subtelomeric DNA Double-Strand Breaks but Is Required for Homologous Alignment in Zebrafish Spermatocytes.

Authors:  Yukiko Imai; Kenji Saito; Kazumasa Takemoto; Fabien Velilla; Toshihiro Kawasaki; Kei-Ichiro Ishiguro; Noriyoshi Sakai
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 4.  The formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Wei Qu; Cong Liu; Ya-Ting Xu; Yu-Min Xu; Meng-Cheng Luo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Conservation and divergence of meiotic DNA double strand break forming mechanisms in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Nathalie Vrielynck; Katja Schneider; Marion Rodriguez; Jason Sims; Aurélie Chambon; Aurélie Hurel; Arnaud De Muyt; Arnaud Ronceret; Ondrej Krsicka; Christine Mézard; Peter Schlögelhofer; Mathilde Grelon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Chromosome Organization in Early Meiotic Prophase.

Authors:  Corinne Grey; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 7.  Meiotic Crossover Patterning.

Authors:  Nila M Pazhayam; Carolyn A Turcotte; Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.