Literature DB >> 33619361

Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study.

Endre Grøvik1,2,3, Darvin Yi4, Michael Iv2, Elizabeth Tong2, Line Brennhaug Nilsen1, Anna Latysheva5, Cathrine Saxhaug5, Kari Dolven Jacobsen6, Åslaug Helland6, Kyrre Eeg Emblem1, Daniel L Rubin4, Greg Zaharchuk7.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 ± 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 ± 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 ± 0.104 vs. 0.774 ± 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 ± 0.225 vs. 0.492 ± 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm3 lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619361      PMCID: PMC7900111          DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Digit Med        ISSN: 2398-6352


  17 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success.

Authors:  James H Thrall; Xiang Li; Quanzheng Li; Cinthia Cruz; Synho Do; Keith Dreyer; James Brink
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  Deep learning in radiology: An overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Mateusz Buda; Ashirbani Saha; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI.

Authors:  Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold; Arvid Lundervold
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.820

Review 4.  VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Qi Dou; Lequan Yu; Jing Qin; Pheng-Ann Heng
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group.

Authors:  Nancy U Lin; Eudocia Q Lee; Hidefumi Aoyama; Igor J Barani; Daniel P Barboriak; Brigitta G Baumert; Martin Bendszus; Paul D Brown; D Ross Camidge; Susan M Chang; Janet Dancey; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Laurie E Gaspar; Gordon J Harris; F Stephen Hodi; Steven N Kalkanis; Mark E Linskey; David R Macdonald; Kim Margolin; Minesh P Mehta; David Schiff; Riccardo Soffietti; John H Suh; Martin J van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Brain tumor segmentation in multi-spectral MRI using convolutional neural networks (CNN).

Authors:  Sajid Iqbal; M Usman Ghani; Tanzila Saba; Amjad Rehman
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence MRI.

Authors:  Endre Grøvik; Darvin Yi; Michael Iv; Elizabeth Tong; Daniel Rubin; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Imaging of cerebral metastases.

Authors:  P W Schaefer; R F Budzik; R G Gonzalez
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multimodal MR images with a deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Odelin Charron; Alex Lallement; Delphine Jarnet; Vincent Noblet; Jean-Baptiste Clavier; Philippe Meyer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.589

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development and Practical Implementation of a Deep Learning-Based Pipeline for Automated Pre- and Postoperative Glioma Segmentation.

Authors:  E Lotan; B Zhang; S Dogra; W D Wang; D Carbone; G Fatterpekar; E K Oermann; Y W Lui
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning in MRI: A Framework for Important Considerations, Challenges, and Recommendations for Best Practices.

Authors:  Akshay S Chaudhari; Christopher M Sandino; Elizabeth K Cole; David B Larson; Garry E Gold; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Matthew P Lungren; Brian A Hargreaves; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.119

3.  Preoperative Brain Tumor Imaging: Models and Software for Segmentation and Standardized Reporting.

Authors:  David Bouget; André Pedersen; Asgeir S Jakola; Vasileios Kavouridis; Kyrre E Emblem; Roelant S Eijgelaar; Ivar Kommers; Hilko Ardon; Frederik Barkhof; Lorenzo Bello; Mitchel S Berger; Marco Conti Nibali; Julia Furtner; Shawn Hervey-Jumper; Albert J S Idema; Barbara Kiesel; Alfred Kloet; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Domenique M J Müller; Pierre A Robe; Marco Rossi; Tommaso Sciortino; Wimar A Van den Brink; Michiel Wagemakers; Georg Widhalm; Marnix G Witte; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Ole Solheim; Ingerid Reinertsen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.086

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.