Literature DB >> 33617188

Bridging the Gap: Patient Navigation Increases Colonoscopy Follow-up After Abnormal FIT.

Gregory E Idos1, Joseph D Bonner1, Shida Haghighat2, Christina Gainey2, Stacy Shen2, Ashwini Mulgonkar2, Karla Joyce Otero3, Christine Geronimo3, Maria Hurtado3, Caitlin Myers3, Jennifer Morales-Pichardo1, Doron D Kahana3,4, Paul Giboney3, Stanley Dea3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies indicate low rates of follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) within safety net health systems. A patient navigation (PN) program is an evidence-based strategy that has been shown to improve colonoscopy completion in private and public healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a PN program to encourage follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal FIT within a large safety net hospital system.
METHODS: We established an enterprisewide PN program at 5 tertiary care hospitals within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services system in 2018. The PN assisted adult patients aged 50-75 years with an abnormal FIT to a follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months. PN activities included initiating referral for and scheduling of colonoscopy, performing reminder phone calls to patient for their upcoming colonoscopy, and following up with patients who did not attend their colonoscopy. We assess the effectiveness of the PN intervention by comparing follow-up colonoscopy rates with a period before the intervention.
RESULTS: There were 2,531 patients with abnormal FIT results (n = 1,214 in 2017 and n = 1,317 in 2018). A majority were women (55% in 2017 vs 52% in 2018) with a mean age of 60 ± 6.2 years. From a previous mean of 163 days without PN in 2017, the mean time from abnormal FIT to colonoscopy with PN improved to 113 days in 2018. The frequency of colonoscopy completion with PN increased from 40.6% (n = 493) in 2017 to 46% (n = 600) in 2018. DISCUSSION: After the introduction of the PN program, there was a significant increase in patients undergoing follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal FIT and patients were more likely to undergo colonoscopy within the recommended 6 months.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33617188      PMCID: PMC7901799          DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2155-384X            Impact factor:   4.488


  35 in total

1.  Improving the effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing in a primary care clinic by direct colonoscopy referral for positive tests.

Authors:  Erik Van Kleek; Shanlgei Liu; Lorraine M Conn; Angelina Hoadley; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.095

2.  Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amy Jeffreys; Cynthia J Coffman; Kenneth Fasanella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; J Phil Harrop; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Effect of acculturation and access to care on colorectal cancer screening in low-income Latinos.

Authors:  Lara S Savas; Sally W Vernon; John S Atkinson; Maria E Fernández
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

5.  Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Racially Diverse Population Served by a Safety-Net Clinic.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nagelhout; Kristen Comarell; N Jewel Samadder; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

6.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

9.  Non-English speakers attend gastroenterology clinic appointments at higher rates than English speakers in a vulnerable patient population.

Authors:  Justin L Sewell; Margot B Kushel; John M Inadomi; Hal F Yee
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; John Z Ayanian; Robert H Fletcher; Mary-Jo DelVecchio Good
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  2 in total

1.  Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Jason Kao; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa D Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy Completion After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.