| Literature DB >> 33616721 |
Shun-Jie Yang1, Jian Li1, Yang Xue1, Zhong Zhang1, Gang Chen2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The postoperative effect of arthroscopy in the treatment of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) varies greatly among individuals. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the factors affecting the postoperative outcomes of symptomatic DLM.Entities:
Keywords: Discoid lateral meniscus; Multivariate analysis; Postoperative effect
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33616721 PMCID: PMC8497286 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03821-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ISSN: 0936-8051 Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study
Basic characteristics of the included patients
| Demographic details | Demographic details | Demographic details | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 502 | No tear | 38 (7.6%) | Level I | 29 (5.8%) |
| Sex | Anterior horn | 27 (5.4%) | Level II | 52 (10.4%) | |
| Female | 353 (70.3%) | Posterior horn | 41 (8.2%) | Level III | 23 (4.6%) |
| Male | 149 (29.7%) | Body | 204 (40.6%) | Level IV | 40 (8.0%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.0 (13.8 ~ 44.4; 4.3) | Two or more locations | 192 (38.2%) | K–L grade | |
| Work intensity | O'Connor type | Level 0 | 375 (74.7%) | ||
| Grade 0 | 27 (5.6%) | No tear | 38 (7.6%) | Level I | 56 (11.2%) |
| Grade 1 | 212 (42.2%) | Longitudinal (/bucket handle) tear | 171 (34.1%) | Level II | 44 (8.8%) |
| Grade 2 | 240 (47.8%) | Horizontal tear | 154 (30.7%) | Level III | 23 (4.6%) |
| Grade 3 | 22 (4.4%) | Oblique tear | 10 (2.0%) | Level IV | 4 (0.8%) |
| Grade 4 | 1 (0.2%) | Transverse (/radial) tear | 45 (9.0%) | Surgical method | |
| Trauma history | Variant tear | 84 (16.7%) | Meniscoplasty | 410 (81.7%) | |
| No | 360 (71.7%) | Medial meniscus tear | Meniscoplasty with repair | 16 (3.2%) | |
| Yes | 142 (28.3%) | No | 484 (96.4%) | Total meniscectomy | 76 (15.1%) |
| Involved knee joint | Yes | 18 (3.6%) | Follow-up time (months) | 75.4 (41.0 ~ 123.3; 33.7) | |
| Left | 252 (50.2%) | Site of knee cartilage lesion | Ikeuchi grade, preoperative | ||
| Right | 250 (49.8%) | No injury | 358 (71.3%) | Poor | 65 (12.9%) |
| Age of onset (years) | 32.0 (3 ~ 80; 26.3) | Lateral compartment | 100 (19.9%) | Fair | 437 (87.1%) |
| Symptoms duration (months) | 10.0 (0.05 ~ 246; 21.0) | Medial compartment | 9 (1.8%) | Ikeuchi grade, postoperative follow-up | |
| Watanabe type | Patellofemoral joint | 8 (1.6%) | Poor | 13 (2.6%) | |
| Complete | 423 (84.3%) | Any two or more compartments | 27 (5.4%) | Fair | 44 (8.8%) |
| Incomplete | 79 (15.7%) | Outerbridge grade | Good | 105 (20.9%) | |
| Site of DLM tear | No injury | 358 (71.3%) | Excellent | 340 (67.7%) |
BMI body mass index, K–L grade Kellgren–Lawrence grade, DLM discoid lateral meniscus, N number, M median, IQR interquartile range
Assignment of research factors for the clinical efficacy evaluation
| Factors | Valuation |
|---|---|
| Sex | Female “0”; male “1” |
| BMI | N/A |
| Work intensity | Grade 0 “0”; grade 1 “1”; grade 2 “2”; grade 3 “3”; grade 4 “4” |
| Trauma history | No “0”; yes “1” |
| Involved knee joint | Left knee “0”; right knee “1” |
| Age of onset | N/A |
| Symptoms duration | N/A |
| Watanabe type | Type I (complete) “1”; type II (incomplete) “2” |
| Site of DLM tear | No “0”; anterior horn “1”; posterior horn “2”; body “3”; any two or more locations “4” |
| O'Connor type | No “0”; longitudinal (/bucket handle) tear “1”; horizontal tear “2”; oblique tear “3”; transverse (/radiation) tear “4”; variant tear (including flap, composite, degenerate meniscus tear) “5” |
| Medial meniscus tear | No “0”; yes “1” |
| Site of knee cartilage lesion | No “0”; lateral compartment “1”; medial compartment “2”; patellofemoral joint “3”; any two or more compartments “4” |
| Outerbridge grade | No “0”; level I “1”; level II “2”; level III “3”; level IV “4” |
| K–L grade | Level 0 “0”; level I “1”; level II “2”; level III “3”; level IV “4” |
| Surgical method | Meniscoplasty “1”; Meniscoplasty with repair “2”; Total meniscectomy “3” |
| Follow-up time | N/A |
| Ikeuchi classification | Excellent “3”; good “2”; fair and poor “1” |
BMI body mass index, K–L grade Kellgren–Lawrence grade, DLM discoid lateral meniscus
Knee function Ikeuchi grade before and after the final follow-up
| Knee function grade | Preoperative | Postoperative follow-up | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ikeuchi grade | − 20.043 | 0.000 | ||
| Poor | 65 (12.9) | 13 (2.6) | ||
| Fair | 437 (87.1) | 44 (8.8) | ||
| Good | 0 (0.0) | 105 (20.9) | ||
| Excellent | 0 (0.0) | 340 (67.7) |
N number
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)
Univariate analysis of research factors and ikeuchi grade
| Variable | Ikeuchi grade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair and poor | Good | Excellent | |||
| Sex | − 3.615 | 0.000* | |||
| Female | 45 (12.7) | 87 (24.6) | 221 (62.6) | ||
| Male | 12 (8.1) | 18 (12.1) | 119 (79.9) | ||
| BMI | 24.5 (4.3) | 23.4(3.8) | 21.0(4.0) | 82.400 | 0.000* |
| Work intensity | 47.059 | 0.000* | |||
| Grade 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 27 (100.0) | ||
| Grade 1 | 16 (7.5) | 28 (13.2) | 168 (79.2) | ||
| Grade 2 | 34 (14.2) | 71 (29.6) | 135 (56.3) | ||
| Grade 3 | 7 (31.8) | 6 (27.3) | 9 (40.9) | ||
| Grade 4 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | ||
| Trauma history | − 2.610 | 0.009* | |||
| No | 50 (13.9) | 77 (21.4) | 233 (64.7) | ||
| Yes | 7 (4.9) | 28 (19.7) | 107 (75.4) | ||
| Involved knee joint | − 1.269 | 0.204 | |||
| Left | 25 (9.9) | 50 (19.8) | 177 (70.2) | ||
| Right | 32 (12.8) | 55 (22.0) | 163 (65.2) | ||
| Age of onset | 51.0 (22.5) | 42.0(13.5) | 24.0(23.0) | 127.998 | 0.000* |
| Symptoms duration | 12.0 (43.5) | 12.0(33.0) | 8.5(18.1) | 15.050 | 0.001* |
| Watanabe type | − 2.110 | 0.035* | |||
| Complete | 46 (10.9) | 82 (19.4) | 295 (69.7) | ||
| Incomplete | 11 (13.9) | 23 (29.1) | 45 (57.0) | ||
| Site of DLM tear | 2.066 | 0.724 | |||
| No tearing | 8 (21.1) | 3 (7.9) | 27 (71.1) | ||
| Anterior horn | 4(14.8) | 8 (29.6) | 15 (55.6) | ||
| Posterior horn | 6 (14.6) | 8 (19.5) | 27 (65.9) | ||
| Body | 16 (7.8) | 49 (24.0) | 139 (68.1) | ||
| Two or more locations | 23(12.0) | 37(19.3) | 132(68.8) | ||
| O'Connor type | 6.775 | 0.238 | |||
| No tearing | 8 (21.1) | 3 (7.9) | 27 (71.1) | ||
| Longitudinal (/bucket handle) tear | 16(9.4) | 45 (26.3) | 110 (64.3) | ||
| Horizontal tear | 12 (7.8) | 28 (18.2) | 114 (74.0) | ||
| Oblique tear | 2 (20.0) | 1 (10.0) | 7 (70.0) | ||
| Transverse (/radial) tear | 2 (4.4) | 12 (26.7) | 31 (68.9) | ||
| Variant tear | 17 (20.2) | 16 (19.0) | 51 (60.7) | ||
| Medial meniscus tear | − 3.777 | 0.000* | |||
| No | 46 (9.5) | 105 (21.7) | 333 (68.8) | ||
| Yes | 11 (61.1) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (38.9) | ||
| Site of knee cartilage lesion | 143.339 | 0.000* | |||
| No injury | 11 (3.1) | 56 (15.6) | 291 (81.3) | ||
| Lateral compartment | 22 (22.0) | 34 (34.0) | 44 (44.0) | ||
| Medial compartment | 3 (33.3) | 3 (33.3) | 3 (33.3) | ||
| Patellofemoral joint | 5 (62.5) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | ||
| Any two or more compartments | 16 (59.3) | 10 (37.0) | 1 (3.7) | ||
| Outerbridge grade | 145.995 | 0.000* | |||
| No injury | 11 (3.1) | 56 (15.6) | 291 (81.3) | ||
| Level I | 0 (0.0) | 10 (34.5) | 19 (65.5) | ||
| Level II | 15 (28.8) | 20 (38.5) | 17 (32.7) | ||
| Level III | 8 (34.8) | 11 (47.8) | 4 (17.4) | ||
| Level IV | 23 (57.5) | 8 (20.0) | 9 (22.5) | ||
| K–L grade | 155.520 | 0.000* | |||
| Level 0 | 10 (2.7) | 64 (17.1) | 301 (80.3) | ||
| Level I | 10 (17.9) | 17 (30.4) | 29 (51.8) | ||
| Level II | 19 (43.2) | 20 (45.5) | 5 (11.4) | ||
| Level III | 14 (60.9) | 4 (17.4) | 5 (21.7) | ||
| Level IV | 4 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Follow-up time | 71.0 (33.2) | 79.9 (40.7) | 74.9 (31.4) | 4.722 | 0.094 |
| Surgical method | 85.971 | 0.000* | |||
| Meniscoplasty | 23 (5.6) | 76 (18.5) | 311 (75.9) | ||
| Meniscoplasty with repair | 2 (12.5) | 6 (37.5) | 8 (50.0) | ||
| Total meniscectomy | 32 (42.1) | 23 (30.3) | 21 (27.6) | ||
BMI body mass index, K–L grade Kellgren–Lawrence grade
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)
Multivariate analysis of research factors and Ikeuchi grade
| Variable | S.E | Wald | OR | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| BMI | − 0.133 | 0.041 | 10.610 | 0.001* | 0.875 | 0.808 | 0.948 |
| Work intensity | − 0.492 | 0.212 | 5.400 | 0.020* | 0.611 | 0.404 | 0.926 |
| Age of onset | − 0.045 | 0.012 | 13.391 | 0.000* | 0.956 | 0.933 | 0.979 |
| Symptoms duration | − 0.012 | 0.003 | 18.767 | 0.000* | 0.988 | 0.983 | 0.994 |
| Outerbridge grade | − 0.450 | 0.191 | 5.557 | 0.018* | 0.638 | 0.438 | 0.927 |
| K–L grade | − 0.239 | 0.193 | 1.540 | 0.215 | 0.787 | 0.540 | 1.149 |
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | − 0.780 | 0.298 | 6.843 | 0.009* | 0.458 | 0.255 | 0.822 |
| Malea | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
| Trauma history | |||||||
| No | − 0.310 | 0.277 | 1.249 | 0.264 | 0.733 | 0.426 | 1.262 |
| Yesa | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
| Watanabe type | |||||||
| Complete | 0.097 | 0.317 | 0.093 | 0.760 | 1.102 | 0.592 | 2.048 |
| Incompletea | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
| Medial meniscus tear | |||||||
| No | 0.619 | 0.606 | 1.043 | 0.307 | 1.857 | 0.567 | 6.086 |
| Yesa | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
| Site of knee cartilage lesion | |||||||
| No injury | 0.354 | 0.796 | 0.198 | 0.657 | 1.425 | 0.299 | 6.780 |
| Lateral compartment | 0.039 | 0.554 | 0.005 | 0.943 | 1.040 | 0.351 | 3.080 |
| Medial compartment | 0.129 | 0.851 | 0.023 | 0.879 | 1.138 | 0.215 | 6.032 |
| Patellofemoral joint | − 0.434 | 0.923 | 0.221 | 0.638 | 0.648 | 0.106 | 3.959 |
| Any two or more compartmentsa | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
| Surgical method | |||||||
| Meniscoplasty | 0.325 | 0.351 | 0.856 | 0.355 | 1.384 | 0.696 | 2.751 |
| Meniscoplasty with repair | − 1.406 | 0.698 | 4.056 | 0.044* | 0.245 | 0.062 | 0.963 |
| Total meniscectomya | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | – | – |
BMI body mass index, K–L grade Kellgren–Lawrence grade, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)
aRepresent Reference group