| Literature DB >> 30086739 |
Tobias M Kraus1, Charlotte Abele2, Thomas Freude3, Atesch Ateschrang2, Ulrich Stöckle2, Fabian M Stuby2, Steffen Schröter2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures requiring surgery are severe injuries of the lower extremity. Tibial plateau fractures have an impact not only on physically demanding jobs but notably on general professional life too. The aim of this study was to assess how the professional activity of patients will be affected after a tibial plateau fracture.Entities:
Keywords: Knee; Professional activity; REFA; Return to work; Tibial plateau fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30086739 PMCID: PMC6081854 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2209-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Patient flow chart
REFA classification of workload
| Grade | Work intensity | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Work without special physical strain | Work without load like, for example, desk work |
| 1 | Work with small physical strain | Handling light work pieces; also lengthy standing or walking around |
| 2 | Work with moderate physical strain | Handling of 1–3 kg control device; carrying loads of 10–15 kg; climbing stairs or ladders without load |
| 3 | Work with hard physical strain | Carrying loads of 20–30 kg, shovelling, digging, chipping, climbing stairs or ladders with moderate load, moderate work in tense work posture |
| 4 | Work with most heavily physical strain | Carrying loads of more than 50 kg, climbing with heavy load, hard work in tense work posture |
Fig. 2Massive destruction of the joint lines. Initial reposition in external fixator. AO 41 C3
Fig. 3Double buttress plating and reconstruction of the joint lines
Fig. 4Long-term, 4 years follow-up with signs of osteoarthritis - Lysholm 89
Fig. 5Long standing X-ray showing straight axis with no difference to contra-lateral side
Fracture classification
| AO classification | Frequency |
|---|---|
| B-type | 20 (51.3%) |
| B1 | 2 (5.1%) |
| B2 | 5 (12.8%) |
| B3 | 13 (33.3%) |
| C-type | 19 (48.7%) |
| C1 | 3 (7.7%) |
| C2 | 5 (12.8%) |
| C3 | 11 (28.2%) |
Days until return to work
| Total ( | B-type-fractures ( | C-type-fractures ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Mean | Standard deviation | Mean | Standard deviation | |
| Physical functioning | 70.00 | 28.49 | 70.00 | 29.06 | 70.00 | 28.76 |
| Physical role functioning | 69.87 | 42.98 | 71.25 | 45.36 | 68.42 | 41.53 |
| Bodily pain | 63.15 | 26.62 | 63.80 | 27.73 | 62.47 | 26.13 |
| General health perceptions | 72.77 | 19.05 | 69.00 | 21.70 | 76.73 | 15.93 |
| Vitality | 53.59 | 17.54 | 55.00 | 20.00 | 52.10 | 14.93 |
| Social role functioning | 91.95 | 19.04 | 98.10 | 6.16 | 85.47 | 25.85 |
| Emotional role functioning | 82.05 | 37.35 | 80.00 | 38.09 | 84.21 | 37.46 |
| Mental health | 75.90 | 16.09 | 76.20 | 18.82 | 75.57 | 13.12 |
Detailed SF 36 subscale analysis
| REFA classification | Number of patients | Minimum day off work | 10% | 25% | Median | 75% | 90% | Maximum day off work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1 | 23 | 10 | 29.4 | 63 | 90 | 150 | 216.8 | 390 |
| 2–4 | 13 | 90 | 102 | 130 | 180 | 377.5 | 590 | 700 |
Outcomes of tibial plateau fractures
| Author | Follow-up (in month) | Number of patients ( | Lysholm- Score (average scores) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tscherne/Lobenhoffer (1993) [ | 70.8 | 190 | 78 |
| Attmanspacher et al. (2002) [ | 48 | 41 | 84 |
| Houben et al. (1997) [ | 61 | 46 | 84 |
| Kraus et al. (2012) [ | 52.8 | 89 | 66.2 |
| Siegler et al. (2011) [ | 59.5 | 21 | 86 |
| Yu et al. (2009) [ | 23.7 | 54 | 79.5 |
| Loibl et al. (2013) [ | 92 | 103 | 94.5 |
| Müller et al. (2014) [ | 49 | 28 | 84.4 |
| Rossbach et al. (2014) [ | 47.2 | 41 | 63.5 |
| Van Dreumel et al. (2015) [ | 78.2 | 61 | 80.0 (KOOS) |