Literature DB >> 3361671

Eleven years of experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis.

S K Wilson1, G E Wahman, J L Lange.   

Abstract

The 11-year experience with 395 consecutive patients in whom an inflatable prosthesis was implanted for the treatment of chronic erectile impotence is reported. Among these patients the most common etiology was vascular disease, followed by diabetes mellitus and radical pelvic surgery. The original American Medical Systems prosthesis with PPT cylinders shows a 61 per cent complication and revision rate with followup from 3 to 11 years. The newer inflatable prostheses manufactured since 1983 have needed revision in only 13 per cent of the patients followed to 4 years. Salvage procedures and increased product reliability have resulted in 97 per cent of the patients being satisfied. Five types of inflatable prostheses are compared and advantages are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361671     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42726-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Innovating Incrementally: Development of the Modern Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Ehlers; Benjamin McCormick; R Matthew Coward; Bradley D Figler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Impotence: diagnosis and management of male erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R S Kirby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-09

3.  Managing impotence in diabetes.

Authors:  D E Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-31

4.  Use of BioPatch® (Protective Disk with Chlorhexidine Gluconate) in Closed-Suction Drainage for Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Khurgin; Bruce Garber
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 5.  Optimal treatment of erectile failure in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  A Chaudhuri; P Wiles
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  A history of penile implants.

Authors:  Katherine M Rodriguez; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 7.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 8.  A review of surgical strategies for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  James Anaissie; Faysal A Yafi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-06

9.  Non-infected penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery; comparison between antibiotic coated and non - coated devices.

Authors:  Seyfettin Ciftci; Tijen Nemut; Mustafa Melih Culha; Hasan Yilmaz; Murat Ustuner; Ufuk Yavuz; Levend Ozkan; Aynur Karadenizli; Sadi Turkan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.