Literature DB >> 33616663

Feasibility of Embedding a Scalable, Virtually Enabled Biorepository in the Electronic Health Record for Precision Medicine.

Kimberley M DeMerle1,2,3, Jason N Kennedy1,3, Octavia M Peck Palmer3,4, Emily Brant1,3, Chung-Chou H Chang1,5, Robert P Dickson6,7, David T Huang1,3, Derek C Angus1,3,8,9, Christopher W Seymour1,3,8,10,11.   

Abstract

Importance: A cornerstone of precision medicine is the identification and use of biomarkers that help subtype patients for targeted treatment. Such an approach requires the development and subsequent interrogation of large-scale biobanks linked to well-annotated clinical data. Traditional means of creating these data-linked biobanks are costly and lengthy, especially in acute conditions that require time-sensitive clinical data and biospecimens.
Objectives: To develop a virtually enabled biorepository and electronic health record (EHR)-embedded, scalable cohort for precision medicine (VESPRE) and compare the feasibility, enrollment, and costs of VESPRE with those of a traditional study design in acute care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective cohort study, the EHR-embedded screening alert was generated for 3428 patients, and 2199 patients (64%) were eligible and screened. Of these, 1027 patients (30%) were enrolled. VESPRE was developed for regulatory compliance, feasibility, internal validity, and cost in a prospective cohort of 1027 patients (aged ≥18 years) with sepsis-3 within 6 hours of presentation to the emergency department. The VESPRE infrastructure included (1) automated EHR screening, (2) remnant blood collection for creation of a virtually enabled biorepository, and (3) automated clinical data abstraction. The study was conducted at an academic institution in southwestern Pennsylvania from October 17, 2017, to June 6, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regulatory compliance, enrollment, internal validity of automated screening, biorepository acquisition, and costs.
Results: Of the 1027 patients enrolled in the study, 549 were included in the proof-of-concept analysis (305 [56%] men); median (SD) age was 59 (17) years. VESPRE collected 12 963 remnant blood and urine samples and demonstrated adequate feasibility for clinical, biomarker, and microbiome analyses. Over the 20-month test, the total cost beyond the existing operations infrastructure was $39 417.50 ($14 880.00 project management, $22 717.50 laboratory supplies/staff, and $1820.00 data management)-approximately $39 per enrolled patient vs $239 per patient for a traditional cohort study. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that, in a large US health system that collects data using a common EHR platform and centralized laboratory system, VESPRE, a large-scale, inexpensive EHR-embedded infrastructure for precision medicine can be used. Tested in the sepsis setting, VESPRE appeared to capture a high proportion of eligible patients at low incremental cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33616663      PMCID: PMC7900864          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  18 in total

1.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.

Authors:  Colin K Grissom; Samuel M Brown; Kathryn G Kuttler; Jonathan P Boltax; Jason Jones; Al R Jephson; James F Orme
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.385

4.  Prehospital identification of community sepsis using biomarkers of host response.

Authors:  Emily B Brant; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton W Callaway; Derek C Angus; Christopher W Seymour
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Raymund Dantes; Lauren Epstein; David J Murphy; Christopher W Seymour; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sameer S Kadri; Derek C Angus; Robert L Danner; Anthony E Fiore; John A Jernigan; Greg S Martin; Edward Septimus; David K Warren; Anita Karcz; Christina Chan; John T Menchaca; Rui Wang; Susan Gruber; Michael Klompas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Lan Kong; Mitchell P Fink; Lisa A Weissfeld; Donald M Yealy; Michael R Pinsky; Jonathan Fine; Alexander Krichevsky; Russell L Delude; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007 Aug 13-27

Review 7.  dPCR: A Technology Review.

Authors:  Phenix-Lan Quan; Martin Sauzade; Eric Brouzes
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Personalized Medicine in Malignant Melanoma: Towards Patient Tailored Treatment.

Authors:  Hildur Helgadottir; Iara Rocha Trocoli Drakensjö; Ada Girnita
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Sameer S Kadri; Robert L Danner; Anthony F Suffredini; Anthony F Massaro; Barrett T Kitch; Grace Lee; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer: The Paths to Truly Individualized Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Eleanor E R Harris
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-05-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Research Agenda for Precision Medicine in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Authors:  Faraaz Ali Shah; Nuala J Meyer; Derek C Angus; Rana Awdish; Élie Azoulay; Carolyn S Calfee; Gilles Clermont; Anthony C Gordon; Arthur Kwizera; Aleksandra Leligdowicz; John C Marshall; Carmen Mikacenic; Pratik Sinha; Balasubramanian Venkatesh; Hector R Wong; Fernando G Zampieri; Sachin Yende
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 30.528

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.