| Literature DB >> 33615164 |
Christoph Eilenberger1,2,3, Florian Selinger1,2,3, Mario Rothbauer1,2,3,4, Yiji Lin1, Andreas Limbeck1, Barbara Schädl5,3, Johannes Grillari5,3,6, Nataliya S Kavok7, Vladimir K Klochkov7, Yuri V Malyukin7, Victor Margitich8, Peter Ertl1,2,3.
Abstract
Both cerium oxide (CeOx) nanoparticles and mefenamic acid (MFA) are known anti-inflammatory agents with hepatoprotective properties and are therefore prescribed for one of the major diseases in the world, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To study the potential cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory effects as well as drug retention of a potential therapeutic CeOx/MFA supramolecular complex, a well-standardized hepatic (HepG2) spheroid model was used. Results showed that the highest cytotoxicity for the CeOx/MFA supramolecular complex was found at 50 μg/mL, while effective doses of 0.1 and 1 μg/mL yielded a significant decrease of TNF-α and IL-8 secretion. Time-resolved analysis of HepG2 spheroids revealed a spatiotemporal distribution of the supramolecular complex and limited clearance from the internal microtissue over a period of 8 days in cultivation. In summary, our results point at rapid uptake, distribution, and biostability of the supramolecular complex within the HepG2 liver spheroid model as well as a significant anti-inflammatory response at noncytotoxic levels.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33615164 PMCID: PMC7887746 DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci ISSN: 2575-9108
Figure 1(a) HepG2 spheroid diameter (μm) over a cultivation period of 6 days postseeding, n = 12, ±SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (b) Table of relative standard deviations (RSDs%) of respective HepG2 spheroid cultivation times of 1, 3, and 6 days. (c) Phase-contrast micrographs of HepG2 spheroids at day 1, day 3, and day 6 of cultivation. Scale bar, 100 μm. (d) Time-resolved intracellular ATP concentration of HepG2 spheroids over a cultivation time of 6 days postseeding, n = 6, ±SD, **p < 0.01. (e) Corresponding live (green)/dead (red) fluorescent micrographs. Scale bar, 200 μm.
Figure 2(a) SMC dose–response curves of HepG2 spheroids after drug exposure times of 24, 48, 72 and 96 h at day 6 postseeding. Error bars represent ±SEM (n = 12). (b) Corresponding IC50 values at respective exposure times. Error bars represent ±SD (n = 12), *p < 0.05.
Figure 3(a) Cellular viability of HepG2 spheroids after 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 days of exposure at SMC concentrations of 20 and 10 μg/mL, n = 3 ± SD. (b) Quantitative analysis of isotope 140Ce detected by ICP-MS in 3D HepG2 spheroids incubated with 0, 10, and 20 μg/mL of SMC, n = 6 ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (c) Cerium distribution in HepG2 spheroids after 0 and 8 days post-treatment with 10 and 20 μg/mL of SMC. 140Ce counts of the spheroid edge (50 μm from outer spheroid rim) and spheroid core (150 μm from outer rim), n = 20 ± SD, **p < 0.01. (d) Microscopic image of H&E stained HepG2 spheroid thin sections and isotope distribution of 140Ce from edges (arrows) to core after incubation with SMC for 48 h with 10 and 20 μg/mL after 0 days (left) and 8 days (right) post-treatment. Scale bar, 100 μm. LA-ICP-MS images were obtained with a laser spot size of 10 μm.
Figure 4(a) Dose–response effects of the supramolecular complex on the viability of HepG2 spheroids treated with 600 μM FFA, n = 3 ± SD, *p < 0.05. Secretion of (b) TNF-α, (c) IL-6, and (d) IL-8 of healthy and FFA treated HepG2 spheroids to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of SMC, n = 3 ± SD, *p < 0.05.