Literature DB >> 26218762

Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: The SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leonardo Kapural1, Cong Yu, Matthew W Doust, Bradford E Gliner, Ricardo Vallejo, B Todd Sitzman, Kasra Amirdelfan, Donna M Morgan, Lora L Brown, Thomas L Yearwood, Richard Bundschu, Allen W Burton, Thomas Yang, Ramsin Benyamin, Abram H Burgher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for chronic pain have limited effectiveness and commonly known side effects. Given the prevalence and burden of intractable pain, additional therapeutic approaches are desired. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) delivered at 10 kHz (as in HF10 therapy) may provide pain relief without the paresthesias typical of traditional low-frequency SCS. The objective of this randomized, parallel-arm, noninferiority study was to compare long-term safety and efficacy of SCS therapies in patients with back and leg pain.
METHODS: A total of 198 subjects with both back and leg pain were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a treatment group across 10 comprehensive pain treatment centers. Of these, 171 passed a temporary trial and were implanted with an SCS system. Responders (the primary outcome) were defined as having 50% or greater back pain reduction with no stimulation-related neurological deficit.
RESULTS: At 3 months, 84.5% of implanted HF10 therapy subjects were responders for back pain and 83.1% for leg pain, and 43.8% of traditional SCS subjects were responders for back pain and 55.5% for leg pain (P < 0.001 for both back and leg pain comparisons). The relative ratio for responders was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5) for back pain and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9) for leg pain. The superiority of HF10 therapy over traditional SCS for leg and back pain was sustained through 12 months (P < 0.001). HF10 therapy subjects did not experience paresthesias.
CONCLUSION: HF10 therapy promises to substantially impact the management of back and leg pain with broad applicability to patients, physicians, and payers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26218762     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  138 in total

1.  Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.

Authors:  Kasra Amirdelfan; Cong Yu; Matthew W Doust; Bradford E Gliner; Donna M Morgan; Leonardo Kapural; Ricardo Vallejo; B Todd Sitzman; Thomas L Yearwood; Richard Bundschu; Thomas Yang; Ramsin Benyamin; Abram H Burgher; Elizabeth S Brooks; Ashley A Powell; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience.

Authors:  Paul Verrills; John Salmon; Marc Russo; Bradford Gliner; Adele Barnard; David Caraway
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Wanru Duan; Eellan Sivanesan; Shuguang Liu; Fei Yang; Zhiyong Chen; Neil C Ford; Xueming Chen; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Mechanism of Action of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Natalie H Strand; Ryan D'Souza; Christopher Wie; Stephen Covington; Moustafa Maita; John Freeman; Jillian Maloney
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 5.  [SCS as a treatment option for failed back surgery syndrome].

Authors:  V Tronnier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Spinal cord stimulation: a nonopioid alternative for chronic pain management.

Authors:  Aaron Hong; Vishal Varshney; Gregory M T Hare; C David Mazer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Deep cerebellar stimulation reduces ataxic motor symptoms in the shaker rat.

Authors:  Collin J Anderson; Karla P Figueroa; Alan D Dorval; Stefan M Pulst
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 8.  Supraspinal Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Modulation of Pain: Five Decades of Research and Prospects for the Future.

Authors:  Eellan Sivanesan; Dermot P Maher; Srinivasa N Raja; Bengt Linderoth; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Facial Pain Update: Advances in Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Facial Pain.

Authors:  Rajivan Maniam; Alan David Kaye; Nalini Vadivelu; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-04

Review 10.  Interventional Pain Management Approaches for Control of Chronic Pancreatic Pain.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Suneil Jolly
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.