BACKGROUND: Transposable elements (TEs) are enriched in cytosine methylation, preventing their mobility within the genome. We previously identified a genome-wide repertoire of candidate intracisternal A particle (IAP) TEs in mice that exhibit inter-individual variability in this methylation (VM-IAPs) with implications for genome function. RESULTS: Here we validate these metastable epialleles and discover a novel class that exhibit tissue specificity (tsVM-IAPs) in addition to those with uniform methylation in all tissues (constitutive- or cVM-IAPs); both types have the potential to regulate genes in cis. Screening for variable methylation at other TEs shows that this phenomenon is largely limited to IAPs, which are amongst the youngest and most active endogenous retroviruses. We identify sequences enriched within cVM-IAPs, but determine that these are not sufficient to confer epigenetic variability. CTCF is enriched at VM-IAPs with binding inversely correlated with DNA methylation. We uncover dynamic physical interactions between cVM-IAPs with low methylation ranges and other genomic loci, suggesting that VM-IAPs have the potential for long-range regulation. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a recently evolved interplay between genetic sequence, CTCF binding, and DNA methylation at young TEs can result in inter-individual variability in transcriptional outcomes with implications for phenotypic variation.
BACKGROUND: Transposable elements (TEs) are enriched in cytosine methylation, preventing their mobility within the genome. We previously identified a genome-wide repertoire of candidate intracisternal A particle (IAP) TEs in mice that exhibit inter-individual variability in this methylation (VM-IAPs) with implications for genome function. RESULTS: Here we validate these metastable epialleles and discover a novel class that exhibit tissue specificity (tsVM-IAPs) in addition to those with uniform methylation in all tissues (constitutive- or cVM-IAPs); both types have the potential to regulate genes in cis. Screening for variable methylation at other TEs shows that this phenomenon is largely limited to IAPs, which are amongst the youngest and most active endogenous retroviruses. We identify sequences enriched within cVM-IAPs, but determine that these are not sufficient to confer epigenetic variability. CTCF is enriched at VM-IAPs with binding inversely correlated with DNA methylation. We uncover dynamic physical interactions between cVM-IAPs with low methylation ranges and other genomic loci, suggesting that VM-IAPs have the potential for long-range regulation. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a recently evolved interplay between genetic sequence, CTCF binding, and DNA methylation at young TEs can result in inter-individual variability in transcriptional outcomes with implications for phenotypic variation.
Entities:
Keywords:
CTCF; Chromatin conformation; DNA methylation; Endogenous retrovirus; Intracisternal A particle; Metastable epiallele; Retrotransposon
Authors: David Adams; Lucia Altucci; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Juan Ballesteros; Stephan Beck; Adrian Bird; Christoph Bock; Bernhard Boehm; Elias Campo; Andrea Caricasole; Fredrik Dahl; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Tariq Enver; Manel Esteller; Xavier Estivill; Anne Ferguson-Smith; Jude Fitzgibbon; Paul Flicek; Claudia Giehl; Thomas Graf; Frank Grosveld; Roderic Guigo; Ivo Gut; Kristian Helin; Jonas Jarvius; Ralf Küppers; Hans Lehrach; Thomas Lengauer; Åke Lernmark; David Leslie; Markus Loeffler; Elizabeth Macintyre; Antonello Mai; Joost H A Martens; Saverio Minucci; Willem H Ouwehand; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Hèléne Pendeville; Bo Porse; Vardhman Rakyan; Wolf Reik; Martin Schrappe; Dirk Schübeler; Martin Seifert; Reiner Siebert; David Simmons; Nicole Soranzo; Salvatore Spicuglia; Michael Stratton; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Amos Tanay; David Torrents; Alfonso Valencia; Edo Vellenga; Martin Vingron; Jörn Walter; Spike Willcocks Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Shaun D Jackman; Benjamin P Vandervalk; Hamid Mohamadi; Justin Chu; Sarah Yeo; S Austin Hammond; Golnaz Jahesh; Hamza Khan; Lauren Coombe; Rene L Warren; Inanc Birol Journal: Genome Res Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Vladimir B Teif; Daria A Beshnova; Yevhen Vainshtein; Caroline Marth; Jan-Philipp Mallm; Thomas Höfer; Karsten Rippe Journal: Genome Res Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Mayank Nk Choudhary; Ryan Z Friedman; Julia T Wang; Hyo Sik Jang; Xiaoyu Zhuo; Ting Wang Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Kevin R Costello; Amy Leung; Candi Trac; Michael Lee; Mudaser Basam; J Andrew Pospisilik; Dustin E Schones Journal: Elife Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Tessa M Bertozzi; Jessica L Becker; Georgina E T Blake; Amita Bansal; Duy K Nguyen; Denise S Fernandez-Twinn; Susan E Ozanne; Marisa S Bartolomei; Rebecca A Simmons; Erica D Watson; Anne C Ferguson-Smith Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 38.330