Literature DB >> 33611773

Hereditary diseases and child wish: exploring motives, considerations, and the (joint) decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples.

Y Severijns1,2, C E M de Die-Smulders3,4, T Gültzow5, H de Vries5, L A D M van Osch5,4.   

Abstract

Couples who are at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may face difficult challenges regarding reproductive decision-making. Deciding if, and how, to purse their child wish can be a demanding process. This study aims to describe the reproductive joint decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples. A qualitative study was conducted with 16 couples (N=31) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring and who received genetic counseling. Most couples were not aware of all available reproductive options in the Netherlands. A variety of motives was reported with almost all couples expressing a preference towards a reproductive option in which the child is genetically related to both parents. Only a few couples considered other options such as the use of donor gametes, adoption, and foster parenting. All couples indicated that they had multiple conversations to reach a mutually supported reproductive decision. Several carriers reported feelings of guilt and in some couples, the woman appeared to have a greater impact in the decision-making process as she should carry a pregnancy and should undergo medical treatments. This study provides insight in the extensive decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples and the role of both partners in this process. These findings can guide the development of genetic counseling (e.g., increase awareness of available reproductive options) and decision support for these couples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child wish; Genetic counseling; Hereditary diseases; Joint decision-making; Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); Prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33611773     DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00510-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  17 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Fran E Carroll; Amanda Owen-Smith; Alison Shaw; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  The decision partner in healthcare decision-making: A concept analysis.

Authors:  Tamryn F Gray; Marie T Nolan; Marla L Clayman; Jennifer A Wenzel
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Support needs of couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer during reproductive decision making.

Authors:  J J G Gietel-Habets; C E M de Die-Smulders; I A P Derks-Smeets; A Tibben; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; R van Golde; E Gomez-Garcia; L A D M van Osch
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Attitudes and Decision Making Related to Pregnancy Among Young Women with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Traci M Kazmerski; Theresa Gmelin; Breonna Slocum; Sonya Borrero; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-04

5.  Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.

Authors:  Gwen Anderson
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.393

6.  Predictive DNA-testing for Huntington's disease and reproductive decision making: a European collaborative study.

Authors:  Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Kurt Nys; Peter Harper; Moniek Zoeteweij; Alexandra Dürr; Gioia Jacopini; Christos Yapijakis; Sheila Simpson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Family planning decisions for parents of children with a rare genetic condition: A scoping review.

Authors:  Melanie Gee; Hilary Piercy; Katarzyna Machaczek
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 8.  The evidence base regarding the experiences of and attitudes to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in prospective parents.

Authors:  Jenny Cunningham; Lesley Goldsmith; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Charlotte J Dommering; Lidewij Henneman; Annemarie H van der Hout; Marianne A Jonker; Carli M J Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Rob B van der Luijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Frans B L Hogervorst; Egbert J W Redeker; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Annette C Moll; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  G De Krom; Y Severijns; W L Vlieg; Y H J M Arens; R J T Van Golde; C E M De Die-Smulders; L A D M Van Osch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variant carriers and reproductive decisions: Gender differences and factors associated with the choice of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND).

Authors:  Lucia Lombardi; Carmen Trumello; Liborio Stuppia; Ivana Antonucci; Tânia Brandão; Alessandra Babore
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.