Literature DB >> 33609399

Failure to rescue patients after emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation: analysis of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA).

O Peacock1, F Yanni2, A Kuryba3, D Cromwell3,4, S Lockwood5, I Anderson6, R S Vohra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Past studies have highlighted variation in in-hospital mortality rates among hospitals performing emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether failure to rescue (FTR) contributes to this variability.
METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or over requiring surgery for large bowel perforation between 2013 and 2016 were extracted from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database. Information on complications were identified using linked Hospital Episode Statistics data and in-hospital deaths from the Office for National Statistics. The FTR rate was defined as the proportion of patients dying in hospital with a recorded complication, and was examined in hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 6413 patients were included with 1029 (16.0 per cent) in-hospital deaths. Some 3533 patients (55.1 per cent) had at least one complication: 1023 surgical (16.0 per cent) and 3332 medical (52.0 per cent) complications. There were 22 in-hospital deaths following a surgical complication alone, 685 deaths following a medical complication alone, 150 deaths following both a surgical and medical complication, and 172 deaths with no recorded complication. The risk of in-hospital death was high among patients who suffered either type of complication (857 deaths in 3533 patients; FTR rate 24.3 per cent): 172 deaths followed a surgical complication (FTR-surgical rate 16.8 per cent) and 835 deaths followed a medical complication (FTR-medical rate of 25.1 per cent). After adjustment for patient characteristics and hospital factors, hospitals grouped as having low, medium or high overall postoperative mortality did not have different FTR rates (P = 0.770).
CONCLUSION: Among patients having emergency laparotomy for large bowel perforation, efforts to reduce the risk of in-hospital death should focus on reducing avoidable complications. There was no evidence of variation in FTR rates across National Health Service hospitals in England.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33609399      PMCID: PMC7896807          DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


  46 in total

1.  A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.

Authors:  Alex B Haynes; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Abdel-Hadi S Breizat; E Patchen Dellinger; Teodoro Herbosa; Sudhir Joseph; Pascience L Kibatala; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Alan F Merry; Krishna Moorthy; Richard K Reznick; Bryce Taylor; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Association of the Hospital Volume of Frail Surgical Patients Cared for with Outcomes after Elective, Major Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel I McIsaac; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Allen Huang; Gregory L Bryson; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Re-interventions, readmissions and discharge destination: modern metrics for the assessment of the quality of care.

Authors:  P J E Holt; J D Poloniecki; D Hofman; R J Hinchliffe; I M Loftus; M M Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Ralph G DePalma; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy A Healey; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue.

Authors:  J H Silber; S V Williams; H Krakauer; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Failure-to-rescue after injury is associated with preventability: The results of mortality panel review of failure-to-rescue cases in trauma.

Authors:  Lindsay E Kuo; Elinore Kaufman; Rebecca L Hoffman; Jose L Pascual; Niels D Martin; Rachel R Kelz; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Failure to rescue in safety-net hospitals: availability of hospital resources and differences in performance.

Authors:  Elliot Wakeam; Nathanael D Hevelone; Rebecca Maine; Jabaris Swain; Stuart A Lipsitz; Samuel R G Finlayson; Stanley W Ashley; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England.

Authors:  Alex M Almoudaris; Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Charles Vincent; Omar Faiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Impact of Hospital Characteristics on Failure to Rescue Following Major Surgery.

Authors:  Kyle H Sheetz; Justin B Dimick; Amir A Ghaferi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.