Literature DB >> 19879782

Re-interventions, readmissions and discharge destination: modern metrics for the assessment of the quality of care.

P J E Holt1, J D Poloniecki, D Hofman, R J Hinchliffe, I M Loftus, M M Thompson.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether administrative data can be used to determine metrics to inform the quality agenda. To determine the relationship between these metrics and the method of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair undertaken.
METHODS: The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were taken for a 5-year period (01.04.2003-31.03.2008). Cases of elective AAA repair were identified. Outcomes were determined in terms of mortality, discharge destination, re-intervention rates and emergency readmission rates. The results were interpreted in light of whether AAA repair was open or endovascular and whether patients were octogenarians or younger patients.
RESULTS: There were 18,060 elective AAA repairs with a mean in-hospital mortality rate of 5.9%. Of these 14,141 were open repairs with a mean mortality of 6.5% and 3919 EVAR (22%) with a mean mortality of 3.8%. EVAR patients were less likely to be discharged to ongoing care (p < 0.001) but were associated with a higher rate of re-intervention (p = 0.001) than open repairs. No differences were seen in one-year readmission rates. Octogenarians were more likely to undergo EVAR (p = 0.001), to be readmitted within 30-days (p = 0.009), to require further interventions on their index admission (p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (p < 0.001) than younger patients.
CONCLUSION: Administrative data can be used to identify metrics other than mortality and length of stay. These metrics might be used to inform service provision. In particular for AAA repair, differences in these outcomes were identified between open repair and EVAR and between octogenarians and younger patients. Copyright 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879782     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  12 in total

1.  [Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms].

Authors:  E S Debus; S W Carpenter; N Tsilimparis; A Larena-Avellaneda; T Kölbel
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Epidemiological study of provision of cholecystectomy in England from 2000 to 2009: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.

Authors:  Sidhartha Sinha; David Hofman; David L Stoker; Peter J Friend; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson; Peter J E Holt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The impact of shortened postgraduate surgical training on colorectal cancer outcome.

Authors:  A Currie; E M Burns; P Aylin; A Darzi; O D Faiz; P Ziprin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Impact of frailty on outcomes after discharge in older surgical patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yibo Li; Jenelle L Pederson; Thomas A Churchill; Adrian S Wagg; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan; Raj S Padwal; Rachel G Khadaroo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Causes and implications of readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Caprice C Greenberg; Amy J H Kind; Jeffrey A Havlena; Matthew W Mell; Matthew T Nelson; Maureen A Smith; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The impact of laparoscopic versus open approach on reoperation rate after segmental colectomy: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Betty Jiang; Ricardo Pietrobon; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Jennifer Q Zhang; Thomas Curran; John C McCallum; Li Wang; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Raul J Guzman; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Dionne S Kringos; Niek S Klazinga; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trajectory Modelling to Assess Trends in Long-Term Readmission Rate among Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  Ahsan Rao; Alex Bottle; Collin Bicknell; Ara Darzi; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-10-21

10.  Common Sequences of Emergency Readmissions among High-Impact Users following AAA Repair.

Authors:  Ahsan Rao; Alex Bottle; Colin Bicknell; Ara Darzi; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.