Literature DB >> 25732165

Phase III open-label randomized study of cytarabine in combination with amonafide L-malate or daunorubicin as induction therapy for patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Richard M Stone1, Emanuele Mazzola2, Donna Neuberg2, Steven L Allen2, Arnaud Pigneux2, Robert K Stuart2, Meir Wetzler2, David Rizzieri2, Harry P Erba2, Lloyd Damon2, Jun-Ho Jang2, Martin S Tallman2, Krzysztof Warzocha2, Tamás Masszi2, Mikkael A Sekeres2, Miklos Egyed2, Heinz-August Horst2, Dominik Selleslag2, Scott R Solomon2, Parameswaran Venugopal2, Ante S Lundberg2, Bayard Powell2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), defined as AML arising after a prior myelodysplastic syndrome or after antineoplastic therapy, responds poorly to current therapies. It is often associated with adverse karyotypic abnormalities and overexpression of proteins that mediate drug resistance. We performed a phase III trial to determine whether induction therapy with cytarabine and amonafide L-malate, a DNA intercalator and non-ATP-dependent topoisomerase II inhibitor that evades drug resistance mechanisms, yielded a superior complete remission rate than standard therapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin in sAML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated sAML were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) continuous intravenous (IV) infusion once per day on days 1 to 7 plus either amonafide 600 mg/m(2) IV over 4 hours on days 1 to 5 (A + C arm) or daunorubicin 45 mg/m(2) IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3 (D + C arm).
RESULTS: The complete remission (CR) rate was 46% (99 of 216 patients) in A + C arm and 45% (97 of 217 patients) in D + C arm (P = .81). The 30- and 60-day mortality rates were 19% and 28% in A + C arm and 13% and 21% in D + C arm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Induction treatment with A + C did not improve the CR rate compared with D + C in patients with sAML.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732165     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  The FLAM regimen: revisiting time sequential induction therapy for patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Steven Knapper
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Benchmarking treatment effects for patients over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tea Reljic; Marina Sehovic; Jeffrey Lancet; Jongphil Kim; Najla Al Ali; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Martine Extermann
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Intensive chemotherapy vs. hypomethylating agents in older adults with newly diagnosed high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: A single center experience.

Authors:  Pankit Vachhani; Raed Al Yacoub; Austin Miller; Fan Zhang; Tara L Cronin; Evelena P Ontiveros; James E Thompson; Elizabeth A Griffiths; Eunice S Wang
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  A phase 1 clinical trial of single-agent selinexor in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ramiro Garzon; Michael Savona; Rachid Baz; Michael Andreeff; Nashat Gabrail; Martin Gutierrez; Lynn Savoie; Paul Morten Mau-Sorensen; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Karen Yee; Thaddeus J Unger; Jean-Richard Saint-Martin; Robert Carlson; Tami Rashal; Trinayan Kashyap; Boris Klebanov; Sharon Shacham; Michael Kauffman; Richard Stone
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Measurement of Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Rahul S Vedula; R Coleman Lindsley
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations.

Authors:  R Coleman Lindsley; Brenton G Mar; Emanuele Mazzola; Peter V Grauman; Sarah Shareef; Steven L Allen; Arnaud Pigneux; Meir Wetzler; Robert K Stuart; Harry P Erba; Lloyd E Damon; Bayard L Powell; Neal Lindeman; David P Steensma; Martha Wadleigh; Daniel J DeAngelo; Donna Neuberg; Richard M Stone; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Randomized multicenter phase II study of flavopiridol (alvocidib), cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) versus cytarabine/daunorubicin (7+3) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Joshua F Zeidner; Matthew C Foster; Amanda L Blackford; Mark R Litzow; Lawrence E Morris; Stephen A Strickland; Jeffrey E Lancet; Prithviraj Bose; M Yair Levy; Raoul Tibes; Ivana Gojo; Christopher D Gocke; Gary L Rosner; Richard F Little; John J Wright; L Austin Doyle; B Douglas Smith; Judith E Karp
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Secondary AML Emerging After Therapy with Hypomethylating Agents: Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Steven D Green; Matthew C Foster; Joshua F Zeidner
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 9.  An update of current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hervé Dombret; Claude Gardin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Immunomodulation with pomalidomide at early lymphocyte recovery after induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML and high-risk MDS.

Authors:  Joshua F Zeidner; Hanna A Knaus; Amer M Zeidan; Amanda L Blackford; Raul Montiel-Esparza; Hubert Hackl; Gabrielle T Prince; Lukasz P Gondek; Gabriel Ghiaur; Margaret M Showel; Amy E DeZern; Keith W Pratz; B Douglas Smith; Mark J Levis; Steven Gore; Catherine C Coombs; Matthew C Foster; Howard Streicher; Judith E Karp; Leo Luznik; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.