| Literature DB >> 25732165 |
Richard M Stone1, Emanuele Mazzola2, Donna Neuberg2, Steven L Allen2, Arnaud Pigneux2, Robert K Stuart2, Meir Wetzler2, David Rizzieri2, Harry P Erba2, Lloyd Damon2, Jun-Ho Jang2, Martin S Tallman2, Krzysztof Warzocha2, Tamás Masszi2, Mikkael A Sekeres2, Miklos Egyed2, Heinz-August Horst2, Dominik Selleslag2, Scott R Solomon2, Parameswaran Venugopal2, Ante S Lundberg2, Bayard Powell2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), defined as AML arising after a prior myelodysplastic syndrome or after antineoplastic therapy, responds poorly to current therapies. It is often associated with adverse karyotypic abnormalities and overexpression of proteins that mediate drug resistance. We performed a phase III trial to determine whether induction therapy with cytarabine and amonafide L-malate, a DNA intercalator and non-ATP-dependent topoisomerase II inhibitor that evades drug resistance mechanisms, yielded a superior complete remission rate than standard therapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin in sAML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated sAML were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) continuous intravenous (IV) infusion once per day on days 1 to 7 plus either amonafide 600 mg/m(2) IV over 4 hours on days 1 to 5 (A + C arm) or daunorubicin 45 mg/m(2) IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3 (D + C arm).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25732165 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544